That s all there is to it, it s required, what kind of sacrifice is used for sacrifice?

It doesn't make much sense to dwell on the number of temporary workers.

The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MOHRSS) solicited public comments on the Several Provisions on Labor Dispatch (Draft for Comments), which stipulates that the number of dispatched workers used by employers in auxiliary positions shall not exceed 10% of the total number of employees. At the same time, if a dispatched worker suffers a work-related injury at the employer, the employer must not only assist in the investigation and handling, but also bear the corresponding liability for compensation (****, August 8).

Whether it is labor dispatch or temporary workers, it is a special product of the reform and transition period, mainly because of its "temporary" characteristics, and it is dispatched by intermediaries rather than directly recruited by the employer and hired by agreement, and there are generally characteristics such as working hours, tired work, low salary, and lack of security. Now that the reform has entered the deep water area, various systems and regulations have been continuously improved and improved, especially the extensive demands and development trends of fairness and justice, which have determined that the labor dispatch system and the group of temporary workers can and should become history.

It may be difficult to abolish labor dispatch and temporary workers across the board, and the reform of the employment system should be steadily promoted, so it is advisable to allow labor dispatch workers, temporary workers and regular workers to achieve equal pay for equal work, and in addition to the nominal difference in status, there should be no substantive differences in various treatments, rights and interests, and guarantees. In fact, the number of temporary workers used by each unit and the length of the dispatch period do not need and should not be forced by external administrative forces, but depend on the needs of the post. Therefore, is it scientific, reasonable and necessary to prohibit temporary employment of more than 10% and the employment period of more than 6 months?

It will take a closer look.

Similarly, the Consultation Paper stipulates that if a dispatched worker suffers a work-related injury at the employer, the labor dispatch entity shall act as the subject of the application to handle matters such as the determination of the work-related injury, and the employing entity shall assist in the investigation and handling, and shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation. Some people think that this is a lot of progress, but in the event of a work-related injury, there is no qualification to apply for compensation, and the employer only "bears the corresponding liability for compensation". What is even more worrying is that if the dispatching unit does not act and does not assert it, won't the rights and interests of the dispatched workers be completely lost?

The positive significance of the introduction of regulations to regulate the employment and protection of rights and interests of temporary workers is self-evident. However, we should not be entangled in the number of workers and the length of the agreed employment period, but should focus on establishing a new mechanism of equal pay, equal status and treatment with regular workers, and effectively solve and improve a series of issues such as the status, treatment and security of temporary workers. In this way, the number of workers and the length of the employment period will no longer be a problem, and it will be more in line with the actual employment needs of relevant units.

If the mandatory ban of 10% works, can it also ban more than 5%, or even prohibit the use of dispatched and temporary workers altogether?

Sorry, I haven't been up in a long time.

Is this retention? You're resigned to your fate

It is recommended that you organize your own language to write a diary in the space, and state the things and thoughts in your heart, especially the beauty of the encounter, the loneliness of separation, and the replacement of the space background ** with a song that fits your current state of mind.

Talk and write: distressed, so.

Signed: Ignore me.

Weibo wrote: Accustomed to thinking about you, 、、、

The vernacular is often a better way to express one's state of mind than the old one.

Unless you are all literary and artistic youths.

However, it's a bit contrived.

If you are firm, why bother, and if you are not firm, what is the point of keeping?

The heart can be felt, not by sweet words.

…Matsuri In Japanese, it means "several cracks"....Festival", the meaning of festival. Did you hear that in this? The sacrifice in Chinese is very different, and it is a sign of mourning.

Therefore, if you write a Chinese article to express joy, you can't use "sacrifice" Sacrifice is a ritual to express remembrance of the deceased! Of course, this is not about the dead, but about love! "Worship of the Dead Love" should mean to pay tribute to love, to remember the feeling of the past, and to pass sadly.

Send a fragile thing, (I like crystal things) means that you really love her, you show him the most transparent self, let him know that you love him, love very transparent, broken means that you cherish this relationship very much, because crystal things are easy to break if you are not careful, tell him to know how to cherish!

It's cold in Henan, give her a pair of gloves and tell her that you really want to warm her for the rest of your life.

Write your love experience into a small book, and then choose songs that both parties like or are related to memories according to your love experience, record them into CDs, and pack them for delivery.

This is also a bit difficult to do, just leave some of your most memorable things, the key is to rely on your own actions!

Boring! It's not romantic.

I suggest that you be romantic together, and be romantic when you break up!

Only then will he remember you! Maybe you'll regret it!

Have you ever been deeply in love with each other? Then why did you break up so easily, and you couldn't see a little sadness in your words! Is this a good gathering and good dispersion? I don't think so!

Chinese have never seen this word.