Know if it doesn t work, know why it doesn t? Ask for answers

There is no solid system in place and in marketing. The background has not been able to make special additions: 1. In the competition with the first, there is no differentiated competition, and there is no obvious superiority in the first.

When there are monopolists in the market, for latecomers, detailed innovation and small improvements in user experience are not enough. There must be a big breakthrough in core needs.

5. The differentiation of Ah and ** is not enough to realize the migration of users. Also, payments are a big issue.

On the battlefield of continuous innovation, the first entrant has an overwhelming advantage; In disruptive innovation, there is a tradition of latecomers prevailing. If your product is a disruptive strategy for some preconceivers, but may be a continuation of the improvement for others, then you should fall back to the planning phase. If your attempt is nothing more than a continuation of innovation for an important first adopter, then you are fighting a battle that you must lose.

It doesn't have to be a failure, it could be a paradigm shift.

From the consumer's point of view, say a few words on the superficial surface:

The core of this problem is best explained by a theory in advertising. USP, unique selling proposition, or differentiation. After there are already two pioneers in this field, there must be a reason to enter this field and let users choose you.

Yes, it's hard to give us that reason. Yes, the difference is very insignificant.

The marginal effect of the Internet is very small, when a network application (product) technology, brand awareness, user experience, and other aspects are done very well, and after reaching a certain scale, there will be a kind of credibility permeating the users. This is very different from traditional business.

The first two aspects focus on external factors, antecedents; Yes, there are failures, of course, there are internal factors, the influence of later factors.

It may be because it is difficult to ask questions, and if you don't succeed, you can add a bounty value appropriately, so there are many such people! Hope, thank you.

As long as you don't violate the rules and don't succeed, you can appeal. The first time you are determined to be in violation of the rules is the system review, as long as you do not violate the rules, you can appeal and be manually reviewed. Hope it helps.

You asked the restrictive question earlier, and so did I. It was blocked for a few days. It's all over for the questions asked. It will be fine in a few days