How to be a good counselor doc

1. The main responsibility of the staff officer is to sort out the combat information, provide information to the military chief and put forward certain suggestions; At the behest of the military chief, specific combat missions were assigned to the units below.

2. The chief of staff is the head of the military command department of the unit at all levels, and assists the military commander of the unit in commanding. For example, the chief of staff of a military region assists the commander of a military region in his work, and the chief of staff of a division assists the division commander in his work. Chiefs of staff are available at all levels above the corps level, including brigades, divisions, group armies, and military regions.

In units below the regimental level, there is only the rank of operational staff officer, but not the post of chief of staff. Only in units at and above the brigade and regimental level are there chiefs of staff. His main duties were to organize information on battles, provide information to military chiefs and make certain recommendations; At the behest of the military chief, specific combat missions were assigned to the units below.

In Europe, chiefs of staff appeared during the Napoleonic Wars. It arose with the emergence of large-scale wars in modern times and adapted to the needs of large corps operations.

The difference between a staff officer and a person who imitates the world is that the reference is different, the emphasis is different, and the citation and usage are different.

First, the reference is different.

1. Staff officer: a person who participates in making suggestions; Negotiate; the name of the military position; Participate in directing troop operations and developing operational plans, etc.

2. Officer: a person who is responsible for a specific matter.

Second, the focus is different.

1. Staff Officer: It focuses on the discussion or strategy of a person participating in a certain virtual service event or battle plan; The title of a certain army.

2. Officer: focus on the expression for doing things; A person who specializes in a specialized job. The governing body of such an organization, which is usually composed of officers, is called the Board of Directors.

3. The usage of cited examples is different.

1. Staff officer: Liu Qing's "History of Entrepreneurship".

Chapter 13 of Part 1: "What a bold and shameless staff officer, this black idea for me!" ”

2. Officer: Director Li, I am very happy that this mission can be carried out with you, and I hope we will cooperate happily!

Hello friends, staff officers and officers are ordinary cadres and clerks of leading organs, and those who work in the military, training, etc. are called staff officers, and those who work in the town stalls of the Ministry of Political Work are called officers.

Differences: There are differences in the departments to which they belong, differences in the content of the work, and differences in universality. In the army, both officers and staff officers are soldiers who serve the people.

I have watched many military-themed TV series, and titles such as staff officers, commanders, and officers often appear. So, what's the difference between a staff officer and an officer?

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has made special provisions on the title of officers in the "Internal Affairs Regulations." Officers are called differently in different types of organs of the armed forces, and the purpose is to facilitate the identification of officers and to facilitate operations and command. For non-leading officers of the organs, those in the military command organs (such as the headquarters) are called staff officers; in political organs (e.g., the Department of Political Affairs); In logistics and equipment organs (e.g., logistics department, equipment department) called assistants.

Pena buried. There are differences in the departments to which they belong:

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has made special provisions on the title of officers in the "Internal Affairs Regulations." Officers are called differently in different types of organs of the armed forces, and the purpose is to facilitate the identification of officers and to facilitate operations and command. For non-leading officers of the organs, those in the military command organs are called staff officers; In political organs, dust ants are called officers.

There are differences in the content of the work:

Officer, refers to the handling of affairs; A person who specializes in a specialized job. In the military, most of the officers are responsible for party building and political education in party and government organs. Staff officers, as a type of military position, are mostly involved in directing troop operations and formulating battle plans.

There is a difference in universality:

The scope of application of officers is more extensive, and anyone who is dedicated to a certain job can become an officer, and there is also this title in the local **, while the staff officer is only available in the military academy troops.

Staff officers, officers, and assistants are all non-leading cadres of different types of organs of the armed forces, and their work functions are different. With the standardized title of an officer, it is convenient for identification and is conducive to combat and command.

After Deng Gong, for example, in the localities, there are mayors, secretaries of municipal party committees, provincial secretaries, secretaries of provincial party committees, one is in charge of political work, and the other is in charge of party work.

Staff officers correspond to the divisions of companies, battalions, regiments, brigades, divisions.

Officers correspond to instructors instructors political commissars at all levels

I'm not talking about professional terms, but that's actually the consciousness.

In the management work, the relationship between the three should be properly handled: the existing power of employees is infinitely expanded, which is easy to weaken the authority and prestige of line personnel; If the functional authority is expanded indefinitely, it can easily lead to long-term leadership, leading to management chaos and inefficiency. To this end, it is necessary to pay attention to the role of staff and at the same time appropriately limit the use of functional authority.

From the point of view of the relationship between the line and the staff, the line personnel have the authority to direct and command, and the staff has the authority to assist and provide advice. The job of the staff is to advise rather than be direct. He only provides information to line supervisors, makes recommendations, and works with line staff.

As can be seen, the relationship between the two is that of "employee suggestions and straight line order". Therefore, when playing the role of an employee, it should be noted that the employee should make independent suggestions and that the employee is not about the employee. Appropriately restricting the use of functional permissions requires limiting the scope of use.

The use of functional rights will be limited to solving problems such as how to do it, when to do it, etc., and then the extension will cancel the work of the line crew; Hierarchical functions and powers should not span the upper echelons of authority. For example, the functions and powers of the Director of Personnel should not exceed the rank of Deputy General Manager.

Hello, according to your question [how to deal with the relationship between participation and staff when the secretary plays the role of staff officer] to make the following answer for you: <>

It is necessary to regard being a good general staff officer as an important task and an unshirkable responsibility of the secretary and staff officer, and strive to strengthen the sense of responsibility and consciousness of the secretary and staff officer of Chang Xianghu in practice. At the same time, you must be able to be a staff officer.

I hope you find the following related extensions: The relationship between staff officers and functional personnel is essentially a relationship of authority. In the management work, the relationship between the three should be properly handled

The existing power of employees is infinitely expanded, which is easy to weaken the authority and prestige of line personnel; If the functional authority is expanded indefinitely, it can easily lead to long-term leadership, leading to management chaos and inefficiency. To this end, it is necessary to pay attention to the role of the work and sedan personnel, and at the same time appropriately limit the use of functional authority. From the point of view of the relationship between the line and the staff, the line personnel have the authority to direct and command, and the staff has the authority to assist and provide advice.

The job of the staff is to advise rather than be direct. He only provides information to the line supervisor, makes recommendations, and works with the line staff. As can be seen, the relationship between the two is that of "employee suggestions and straight line order".

Therefore, when playing the role of an employee, it should be noted that the employee should not be able to make independent suggestions, and that the employee is not about the employee. Appropriately restricting the use of functional permissions requires limiting the scope of use. The use of functional rights will be limited to solving problems such as how to do it, when to do it, etc., and then the extension will cancel the work of the line crew; Hierarchical functions and powers should not span the upper echelons of authority.

For example, the functions and powers of the Director of Personnel should not exceed the rank of Deputy General Manager.

Still have questions? Kiss, can you talk about it specifically? Or is there anything you'd like to talk about? <>