What do you think about the fact that the teacher talks less in class and makes the students practic

I am a big proponent of this approach to education, and I also recommend that teachers try to let children be more proactive and think about problems in this way.

In the process of the teacher's lecture, some teachers are particularly fond of preaching, and at the same time, they do not give students the opportunity to think and speak. Although this method seems to be very efficient, it can also be used to complete all the lessons as quickly as possible. However, for students, because students have different levels and speeds of knowledge, many students do not really master the knowledge, which directly leads to uneven students' grades, which is actually very common.

First, I am very supportive of this type of education.

For teachers, if the teacher can talk about as little content as possible in the classroom, and at the same time let the students practice and think about the knowledge, this is a very interactive way of education. In the process of the teacher's lecture, we can further integrate into it, and at the same time, we can absorb knowledge through thinking, and the students will learn more deeply. <>

Second, it is a good thing for students to think about problems actively.

For many students, there are students who have not mastered the right way to learn, they are just cramming for learning. This way of learning can cope with simple courses, but it is difficult for students to really understand the knowledge points, and the students' academic performance is not satisfactory. For teachers, teachers should guide students to think about problems as much as possible, and in this way, develop correct study habits.

3. Personally, I think the main characters in the classroom are the students.

Some teachers especially like to talk in class, and they also like to force students to learn in various ways. This method seems to be useful, but for students, students do not really learn from the bottom of their hearts, and at the same time, they will use various perfunctory ways to pretend to learn. I don't think the teacher is the protagonist in the classroom, the real protagonist belongs to the students who think in the audience, and when the students can really start to take the initiative to learn knowledge, the students' academic performance will naturally improve.

I think this is a very wrong thing, because only after the teacher has spoken, the students will know where to think, if the teacher does not lecture, how should the students think? After writing, the teacher can let the students answer the answers, and then talk about these questions, which can not only allow students to learn new knowledge, but also allow students to practice and review. <>

First of all, the teacher must hand over the new course to the students, otherwise, how will the students know how to learn? Secondly, the teacher can give these contents to the students, and then they can also tell the students that they can find similar questions to write on some exercise books, or they can let the students go to each other to see if the students have really learned? Finally, the teacher can also give the students some test questions collectively for the students to do, and after doing it, the teacher can check it, and then tell the students the answer in class, or talk about how to solve the problem.

I think that this can make the students' memories more profound, and also make the students feel that the atmosphere of the class is better. <>

I feel that this kind of behavior is very incorrect, because it may make students unable to understand what the teacher says less, and students will be confused, which will also make students feel very headache when solving problems, and will make students' problem solving more and more troublesome.

For example, the teacher can take a little bit of the questions that have already been taught, but the new course still needs to be taught seriously, so that students can really understand and learn how to solve the problems, so that the teacher's education is useful. Since the teacher has chosen the teaching profession, this profession cannot be lazy or perfunctory.

I think this approach is not very feasible, the student's understanding ability is not very good, some problems need to be explained by the teacher in detail, otherwise it will affect the student's grasp of knowledge, which not only can not exercise the child's ability to learn independently, but also will affect the child's thinking ability.

This is the right thing to do, so that the child can have a good development of thinking, will not limit the child's thinking, and can make the student's thinking active.

I very much agree that this can slowly guide students to think, can develop children's brains, and is good for students' growth.

A small number of students who answered the questions were either more interested in the course itself, or they were serious about studying each subject. You should combine some realities, not pure theory, and add your own teaching style (preferably one that students like), so that there will be more people who listen to the lectures

It is impossible for all students in a class to be interested in your teaching. But doing your best to involve students in the classroom is one of the teacher's teaching goals.

For such a phenomenon, I personally think that it is necessary to ask more questions to students, and to ask questions with various excuses without raising their hands but to know how to answer, and finally to have positive encouraging comments. Classroom questioning is a kind of technical work, which should adapt to the needs of students of different levels in the class, give simple questions to students with low levels, and improve their enthusiasm; Give more difficult questions to children at a higher level, stimulate their enthusiasm for exploration, and by the way, make them not too conceited and disdainful to answer.

In fact, the most important thing is the teacher's basic skills such as classroom design and classroom language, and it is very important to communicate with students in class and after class.

Problem analysis: Hello, according to the situation you provide, the development of society is fast, the pressure of competition is high, and a lot of talents are needed, if you can't improve your academic and technical skills, how to face your own life in the future, learning is what you must accept at this age, you have to set goals according to your actual situation, complete them in accordance with your own goals, you can complete the goals in stages, and you must regret learning to set goals and plans for yourself, and you must look at your own learning correctly.

Suggestions: Hello, according to the situation you provide, the society is developing rapidly, you are often in contact with various forms of society, then for this change sometimes you can accept, but there is no way to accept the pure time of the answer, will go to drill the horns, which will affect their own learning, we must face up to our own direction, clear their goals, actively devote themselves to learning, to learn to set plans for themselves, to pay attention not to stay up late, pay attention to the combination of work and rest, participate in more meaningful activities, Remember not to get angry, have faith in yourself, and wish you health and happiness every day!

Answer]: When teachers are in the situational stage, they often think about "how to teach well".