-
Perhaps, because in the process of adapting to the environment, people will undergo a series of changes in their faces, and at the same time, when they are still choosing mates, they will choose mates with more beautiful faces to reproduce, so the next generation will have better genes, so future humans may be more beautiful.
-
Yes. Because beautiful people will survive more easily and will have access to better resources, I think that humans in the future will be more beautiful than modern people.
-
Pretty is a kind of rhetoric for aesthetics, and the standard of beauty is different in different periods. In the Han Dynasty, the standard of women's beauty was lightness, and later in the Tang Dynasty, plump beauty became popular again. Beauty is personal, not time.
It is a personal opinion that others think you are pretty.
-
Yes. Because organisms continue to evolve in order to adapt to their environment, humans also evolved.
-
Humans are certainly evolved, and there is no need to doubt Darwin's theory of evolution at all.
-
I think so. Not only did Darwin put forward the theory of evolution, but we also put it forward in China, and we also found real evidence. Because we have ape blood in us.
-
Not exactly!
Some time ago! The American Natural Sciences will find that the evolution of human bones does not fully support Darwinian evolution!
-
Everyone believed in his basic views. Natural selection, natural selection, and survival of the fittest are the basic ideas of the Great Darwinian theory of evolution. In today's increasingly competitive world, everyone believes in competition.
Competition has become an eternal theme, and only competition can survive. At the heart of Darwinian evolution is natural selection, as well as the existential competition and gradualism associated with natural selection. "Adaptation" is the basic idea in Darwin's "Theory of Evolution", a famous British biologist.
Through long-term observation and investigation and research, he came up with the famous evolutionary laws in the biological world - "survival of the fittest" and "use in and waste out". Many people today believe it because Darwinian evolution makes a lot of sense. He was the first to recognize the possibility of such a hypothesis:
All variations in the organic and inorganic worlds occur according to the laws of nature and not by divine interference". We also see that Lenin, summing up the significance of Darwin's theory of evolution, said: "Darwin's writings finally drove God out of nature, and biological science stood on its feet."
These discourses begin with the role of evolution in combating theology.
-
The words of the exam are correct.
But science is just speculation and not necessarily entirely correct.
-
Because there is no more accurate answer than him right now so that's it
-
a In subparagraph b, "man" and "all living things" are subordinate, not juxtaposed; Item c lacks a subject; Subparagraph (d) lacks the object "dilemma" after "getting out".
According to Darwin's theory of evolution, human beings should also continue to evolve, and perhaps human beings will become different from us in the future. The principle of "survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest" has always been applicable. All living things in nature, including human beings, have evolved every step in order to adapt to the changes in nature and allow themselves to survive. >>>More
What role did Darwin's theory of evolution play in restoring human face for the first time? The theory of evolution has always been a scientific book, and based on the above theory, it is possible to determine whether the restored face is in line with the environment at the time, and other facts, which plays a certain basic and auxiliary role in the restoration of the face. >>>More
In 1837, Darwin used a hypothetical tree to sketch the evolution of species for the first time. This concept soon became a hallmark of the theory of evolution by natural selection. But scientists now say Darwin's signature "evolutionary tree of life" showing the relationship of species in evolutionary history is wrong and needs to be replaced by a new theory. >>>More
Not quite right. First, the theory of evolution.
It is an assumption in itself, and there are many contradictions or imperfections. It is very dangerous to be drawn into social value judgments all at once. The Industrial Revolution in the Modern West. >>>More
In fact, there are not many people who question it, that is, some people who do not think that they look down on the theory of evolution, although the theory of evolution is flawed.