How can you not stand on the moral high ground to judge the right or wrong of a thing or a person?

<> because we are not the parties, just a bystander, we have no way to understand the feelings of the parties, so we have no reason to stand on the moral high ground to accuse the person of right and wrong, all we can do is to understand and respect each other, after all, the victims are not ourselves.

Criticizing and preaching to the other party in the name of "morality" seems reasonable, but in fact, it is not thinking about problems from the other party's perspective and position at all, but self-righteously using "morality" to criticize others. To deal with the mistakes of others, we must first reflect on ourselves and then persuade others. <>

Please don't stand on the moral high ground to judge anyone's rights and wrongs. Quite simply, you're not him. You are not me, how do you know my suffering, there is no empathy in the world.

Although we often say not to put ourselves on the moral high ground, we make this mistake all the time, so the best thing is not to judge.

In fact, we don't have to stand on the moral high ground to judge the behavior of others, but we need to reflect on ourselves. Don't turn yourself into the embodiment of truth, goodness and beauty, "burn yourself and illuminate others", morality, without rational understanding, it can only be dogma. When you take yourself too seriously, you don't care about judging others anymore.

There is no right or wrong in this world, only different positions, and people's so-called right and wrong are just standing on the moral high ground to judge whether something is in line with morality. So the best thing is not to judge, and the person who judges is not necessarily the person who really understands what happened.

There are many people who like to stand on the moral high ground to judge a person, or the right or wrong of a thing, but this way is wrong, because the protagonist of the incident is not you, and you can't understand the mentality of the parties, so we should understand each other, respect each other, and think from each other's standpoint.

There are many people who like to stand on the moral high ground to judge others, but this method is very wrong, because these things do not happen to us, so we have no way to understand the pain of others, and there is no way to blame others, all we can do is mutual respect and mutual understanding.

The highest point of morality is actually a standard point that you set for yourself, but this standard point is only your own opinion, not the other party's opinion, so we should understand and respect each other, and only in this way can we get along with friends more happily.

A person who stands on the moral high ground to criticize people is, on the one hand, a person who does not have as high moral cultivation as the commanding height, but only sticks to this moral high ground in order to flaunt himself or highlight himself. They only rely on the knowledge of some great moral principles to maintain his righteous incarnation. A person with moral cultivation will not casually stand on the "commanding heights" to criticize others, and people with moral cultivation are generally more low-key, more rational, and more objective in dealing with problems or contradictions because of their cultivation; A person with moral cultivation is generally more likely to understand others, and even if others accidentally behave immorally, he will forgive others.

On the other hand, people who stand on the moral high ground are generally "flashlights", holding flashlights that only shine on others and not on themselves. According to others, it is difficult for others to find a breakthrough at the moral level, and they always feel that something is wrong, but they don't know that something is wrong or don't know how to reciprocate; When you look at yourself, everything is a reason, and you push your moral responsibility cleanly. People who stand on the moral high ground do not care about the feelings of others, they only care about their own feelings, and they care about some of their own needs.

Because some people need to seek a sense of existence and identity on the Internet, but when they evaluate the things encountered by others, they often put themselves in the perspective of God, treat themselves more leniently, and be strict with others, so it is easy to criticize others.

1. Look for superiority.

Some people are not happy in real life, or they can't realize their own value, so they need to find some superiority on the Internet. When you see something bad happening to someone else, you can't understand the situation of others with empathy or compassion, you can only look at others from the perspective of God, and then start to criticize others for what is wrong with their choices, completely standing on the moral high ground, but ignoring that you are a bystander, but others are a fan of the authorities. Seek superiority in the process of criticizing others.

2. The psychology of an indifferent bystander.

Human beings are very prone to the phenomenon of "the authorities are confused, but the bystanders are clear". When you are in the position of a bystander, you will treat what others are doing with indifference. Because you are not a victim, you will not feel pain if you don't cut the knife on your body, so you can stand on the moral high ground to blame others, enjoy the process of blaming others, and enjoy the feeling of being God's fingers.

Some people's practices are not so much for the sake of maintaining public order and good customs, but rather for the sake of satisfying themselves with the pleasure of their tongues and promoting their own justice.

3. Blindly go with the flow.

When a person is in a crowd, it is easy to blindly follow the crowd. Sometimes some of the events exposed on the Internet are only one-sided, and should not be commented on until the full picture is known, but some people like to directly stand on the moral high ground to accuse and judge others, because such words will bring them traffic and opportunities to make money. Blindly following the crowd is to achieve the purpose of making your own profits.

We don't have to pay attention to the comments of such people, and wait for the truth to be revealed, and then it's not too late to criticize. In the crowd, it is difficult not to be part of the rabble, but try to stand tall and see far.

When it comes to this issue, you can dig deep into the history and culture of our country, what is morality? In fact, since ancient times, our country is a country that attaches great importance to etiquette, and there have been many famous educators in different historical periods, such as Lao Tzu, Confucius, Mencius, etc., and many excellent propagators of etiquette, who have influenced generations of people with their own ideas, so until now, we have continued the tradition left by our ancestors, such as respecting the old and loving the young, courtesy to others, etc., which shows that our people are imperceptibly influenced.

First of all, we have to look at this problem rationally, which has historical origins, because they have been strengthened by their previous educational concepts and forced others to change, in fact, they do not know whether this approach is right or wrong while accusing others. It's caused by getting stuck in your own habitual thinking. In other words, they are also ignorant.

There is no need to take this kind of problem seriously, but the times in which we live are different, and modern people are paying more and more attention to the freedom of human nature and are becoming more and more open-minded. If we lived in a past era, who would have realized that it was a mistake to stand on the moral high ground and point fingers at others?

For example, in ancient times, usually the death penalty criminals who were sentenced to death by the imperial court would let them go to the streets, accept the scolding of the masses and all kinds of inhumane denunciations, so when we lived in that era, who would realize that in fact, this is also a violation of other people's human rights?

Of course, living in contemporary times, for those who always stand on the moral high ground to accuse others, of course we have to correct, but there is no need to go online, we must classify them as a certain group of people to treat them differently, but with the changes of the times, the development of human beings, and the progress of society, they have not kept up with the pace of this great era, and their thinking concepts are still stuck in the past trend of thought.

I feel at the highest point of morality.

There is no problem in looking at the things themselves.

It is said that you should look at things from multiple angles.

The highest point of morality is also an angle.

This is the highest point of academics.

Looking at one plus one cannot prove that two are the same.

It's all a matter of perspective.

A lot of old sayings.

It's all from the perspective of the highest point.

Those who despise those who do not look at things from the highest point of view.

It's limited by an angle.

Or rather, it is limited by the subjective perspective.

Can't see anything else.

It is impossible to find out.

In fact, the highest point of morality.

It is also a way to see things.

There can be many angles to see a thing.

Restricted by any angle.

I can't understand this.

Morality is the way that people with high IQs use to restrain the behavior of low IQ businessmen and thus disenfranchise them, and people with high emotional intelligence tend to use morality to create a comfortable environment.

In fact, these people are still very common in life, and they are keyboard warriors on the Internet. It may be because of their own psychological problems.

Some people are just stronger, and then they feel good about themselves, and they feel that what they say and what they feel is right, and what they say is right.

It is the kind of person who is very conceited, he feels that what he says and asks and feels is correct, and he is like standing on the kind of high point and criticizing others and demanding others with his own standards.

Morality is used to restrain oneself, not to blame others. Be yourself and don't pay attention to others.

There is a quote in To Kill a Mockingbird: "You can never really get to know a person unless you walk around in their shoes and put yourself in their shoes". So many times, what we see is not the truth of the matter, and morality is used to discipline ourselves, not to blame others.

To be yourself well is to practice the best practice for yourself.

It's all self-righteous stuff, there's nothing to say, let him go si!

This kind of person has never seriously examined himself, and he just walks the world with one mouth.

Because these people are relatively shallow, they only see the side of a person, and they don't see the front, they feel that they are particularly smart, and they feel that their status is relatively high, so there will be this kind of disrespectful behavior of others, and there is a problem with the three views.

Because these people don't know how to respect others, these people are generally insecure, and they can't meet the target standards, so they can only ask others in this way, which is a psychological problem.

Because these people feel that they are very high people, and they also feel that their concepts are very correct, and they feel that they have the ability to judge the lives of others, so such people appear.

Because these people are very idle, and these people always like to meddle in other people's lives, these people want to publish something on the Internet to get everyone's approval.

Moral kidnapping, the moral yardstick is vague, and different people use morality differently. One group is desperately asserting a certain morality, and another group may feel that they have been "kidnapped".

Another characteristic of "moral kidnapping" is the infringement of the rights of the private sphere by the morality of the public domain. Morality often requires people to cede certain rights, but this transfer must be voluntary and non-coercive. "Moral kidnapping" often violates rights in the name of morality, and is accompanied by labeling behavior, such as demanding what "young people" and "people with feelings" should be.

Moral claims should be based on the premise of respecting rights, and morality cannot be used to deprive a person of his rights, let alone use labels to force a person to give up his rights.

The reason why many people are accustomed to standing on the moral high ground to judge others is because many of us are unaware of a state on our network, and there is now a lot of information that can be provided to us on the Internet. <>

In fact, most of the people nowadays are actually lacking in quality, if we do not find the existence of such people in our daily life, we will find a lot of such people in the network, because in ordinary life, in the process of getting along with reality, we can not leave a bad impression on others, so we will have a very convergence for such a situation, and in the process of getting along with the daily reality, we will not deliberately expose the darkest side of our hearts. But when facing the screen of the mobile phone, it is actually like this, when we are in a busy work society all day, we may be very unconcerned about these things, and we have no time to pay attention to such things. But if you are not very busy during the day, when you see these news on the Internet, in fact, for many of us, you will show your ugliest side. <>

Standing on the highest point of one's own morality to judge others, not understanding one's own position, and not being aware of one's own reality, but only expressing all the thoughts about all this, and using the most vulgar language, even some language that we cannot understand. But in fact, everyone's personality in reality is actually different from the personality on the Internet, and many of us can see it. There may be a certain restraint in some of their usual lives, and they will not even show their other side, but this is not the case on the Internet, and a person who is usually particularly taciturn may also be an Internet troll on the Internet.