Wrong thing, not right person? What does it mean to be right about things and not to people?

"Treat things not people" emphasizes "things" as the center, only see "things" but not "people", but things are done by people, people are the main body, should not simply talk about things, to combine people, combined with the specific situation to see the problem. Only by solving the problem of "people" can we fundamentally solve "things". There is an ancient Greek proverb that says, "Man is the measure of all things."

In the interaction between man and the outside world and nature, man either changes the environment, or changes himself to adapt to the environment, and when the change of the environment is frustrated, he can only change himself.

Combined with reality:

For example, I once discussed an issue with someone, since it was a discussion, of course there were different opinions, you can say right, of course I have the right to say wrong, everyone has the same right to express their own opinions. But if you get angry and start attacking me personally, because I'm wrong, the nature of the problem changes.

People are different, everyone has their own personality, how to integrate their own personality into this collective, is a problem, it is impossible to be completely consistent, to "seek common ground while reserving small differences"! If you have any opinions, you can put forward, but don't target individuals, everyone finds that the problem is nothing more than to solve the problem, and if you can't solve the problem but offend other owners, then the gain outweighs the loss, and you lose the meaning of coming to this forum.

Some people like to joke, some people like to find problems, jokes to divide people, find problems to be reasonable, jokes about the wrong object, will only cause a misunderstanding, find that the problem is fierce, will only bring a quarrel. Therefore, how to use your dexterous mouth to say beautiful words is something that you should pay attention to if you are smart, and the Chinese Chinese are so rich and have so many meanings, how to say it is a science.

It's pure nonsense, it's man-made, how can it be wrong?

Wrong thing, not right person?

There is no favoritism, targeting, discrimination, or insult when doing things, and only others will take the same measures and say the same thing"It's not right for people"Relatively.

Introduction

Right: The choice of the event (right or not) and the way to deal with it (the appropriate way to solve the problem).

Towards people: Attacks (personality, personality, etc.) (including: attacking personality language, strong tone of voice, and even angry expressions, etc.).

The purpose is to promote the effective progress of things on both sides, and at the same time pay attention to their own emotions, and do not extend the negative opinions of the other party to the level of personality and humanity.

Explained

It's not right for people"That is to say, when solving problems, people are the focus of attention, and only by solving people's problems can we solve them fundamentally. "Wrong thing, not right person? "What people pursue is that when criticizing or praising others, they only focus on things, wrong or right, black or white, at a glance, and there is no emotional factor in it. People often wonder about those"Right to things and not to people"of those cast approving glances, and reserved contempt for those"People who don't do things right"。

However, it is very interesting to note that many things in the work are not as clear as the above classifications. Different people may make different judgments about the same incident when the same person deals with the same event.

Some people think that this person's style of doing things absolutely belongs"Wrong thing, not right person? ";Some people may think that it is typical"It's not right for people"。One is the case of oneself firmly believing that one belongs"Wrong thing, not right person? ", but others think they belong"It's not right for people"。Or, I played a little clever, it was"It's not right for people", but after self-justifying explanations, others really think they are"Wrong thing, not right person? "。

The most effective way to communicate with colleagues is to seek truth from facts, be honest and reciprocal, and do things right and not right people is the "royal way" for dealing with daily affairs in the workplace. Office Lady should treat things with a fair heart, rather than "watching people put on the dishes" and "different from person to person".

The most effective way to communicate with colleagues is to be honest and honest

Doing things right, not people, is the "royal way" to deal with daily affairs in the workplace. Office Lady should treat things with a fair heart, rather than "watching people put on the dishes" and "different from person to person".

Some women in the workplace often look first and foremost at who is doing it

Then make subjective judgments based on objective factors such as the degree of intimacy with the person doing the work and the level of the person's position. Wrapping the human factor in daily work is not only an injustice to others, but also a reduction in one's own personality and integrity to a certain extent. When dealing with the same thing, we must not confuse subjective factors with objective conditions, and only by distinguishing right from wrong and correctly handling it will we be invincible in the complex and changeable workplace.

Ella and the Tass Slim work in the same company, and because of their similar temperaments and similar hobbies, the two have a good personal relationship and are like sisters. I joined the company two years earlier, and I quickly became the boss of the department because of my hard work, but her friendship with her has never been affected by the relationship between superiors and subordinates.

Treating things differently means not being partial in doing things, and other people will take the same measures and treat them equally.

Matter: The selection and handling of events.

To people: Reciprocal aggression, including attacking personality language, strong tone of voice, and even angry expressions.

The purpose is to promote the effective progress of things on both sides, and at the same time pay attention to their own emotions, and do not extend the negative opinions of the other party to the level of personality and humanity.

Treat people wrongly: It means that you only value the character, and do not pay attention to whether the result of the thing is successful or unsuccessful. For example, this person has not done a good job, but his character is still judged on which line of the wheel, which is the opposite of what he means to do things and not to others.

Explain in detail

What people pursue is that when criticizing or praising others, they only focus on things, wrong or right, black or white, at a glance, without the slightest emotional factor in it. It is common to cast a sapical glance at those who are not right and leave contempt for those who are not right.

If a person in the same Kirisui deals with the same incident, different people may come to different judgments. Some people think that this person's style of doing things is definitely not the right thing, but some people may think that it is a typical right person and not the right thing. One is when you firmly believe that you belong to the right thing and not to the right person, but others think that you belong to the right person and not the wrong thing.

Or, I played a little clever, I was originally wrong with people, but after self-justifying explanations, others really thought that they were digging up codes and not people.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - right things not people.

"Treat people not right" and "treat things not people" are common sayings in Chinese, which are applicable in different contexts, and the meaning of "not to people is not right" is the opposite of "not to people", which refers to the practice of someone, etc., but does not discuss this matter.

"Dealing with the problem, not the person" means that the problem is dealt with in a way that focuses on the nature, severity, and impact of the matter, rather than on the person who is engaged in the experience. In fact, "not the right person" or "the right thing is not the right person" is just a simple statement, and there is no absolute standard. It reflects people's expectations of "objectivity, science, and fairness" in the internal management of the organization, and dissatisfaction with "subjective, extensive, and partial".

1. "The right thing is not the right person", which means "there is no favoritism in doing things, and other people will take the same measures and treat them equally". On the basis of facts, there will be no favoritism.

2. "Treat people and things wrong", which means "only pay attention to character, not whether the result of things is successful or failing". For example, you are not doing a good job, but your character is okay. Contrary to the meaning of "right thing, not right person".

There's nothing wrong with that.

It is easy for people to implicate themselves in other people's accusations or attacks on their own views. And this kind of judgment is an emergency judgment that is not controlled by the brain.

People often turn their attacks on their opinions or remarks into personal attacks on themselves. In fact, if you go back to the roots, sometimes the remarks or behaviors you make do not come from individuals, sometimes they are even instilled in you by others, or from an irrelevant article, you will think that you think it is very good, so you will absorb it.

Even if you really want to investigate yourself, it can only be said that the cognitive bias caused by the cognitive bias of your class has caused you to absorb the wrong teaching or education, and it is not you who is wrong. At most, what people criticize is personal actions.

It's easy for a child's world to point directly at someone because of something, but not in the adult world. When we talk about this person and that person, the premise is that the premise is that "people" is self-evident and does not need to be discussed in depth.

But in fact, man is a very complex animal, and there are various indescribable forces surging within him, and everyone will have their own perspective. If something happens and we first target people, we are likely to lose objectivity, or the least of reason.

At this time, you will be willful, rather than objectively sorting out the clues. The same thing is like this from the person's point of view, but it can be diametrically opposed from the person's point of view, but both people feel that they are right. So when you encounter something, the first thing you need to do is to calm down and first distinguish between things.

The relationship between people is different, some people may be born in love, and some people may be annoyed by a glance. At this time, if you don't do the right thing to the person, often the good thing will be messed up. Moreover, this kind of pertinence will stimulate all kinds of bad emotions, and what was originally a small contradiction is very likely to evolve into a big contradiction.

In addition, if we only treat people, when we meet someone we like, it is very likely that we will overindulge him and favor him. It's like there are many parents now, when they take their children, because they spoil their children excessively. Obviously, the child's behavior is extremely unkind, but due to inner favoritism, it is often directly filtered out, and it is difficult to cultivate high-quality children in this way.

First of all, treating people not for things and not for people is not an extreme strategy, but two normal judgment strategies.

When a person does something, when you need to make a judgment, there are two paths to choose: 1make judgments about the person's character; 2.Make judgments about his performance and motives in this event (environment).

Option 1 is the so-called judgment of people and things. In fact, we humans make this judgment most of the time, and there is a reason for this, because we need to try to avoid contact with dangerous individuals in our interactions, and if we see a person hitting someone, we want to stay away because this person may hurt us, and we are afraid that he is a violent person.

The risk of not being right for people is that it is very, very unreliable to make character judgments about people based on just one thing or a few things in a specific environment. Especially if you work for a long time in a place like "company", you want people around you to evaluate you based on your consistent performance, rather than focusing on one thing. For example, one day I dozed off at work, and the leader directly scolded me for being a "lazy pig" (to people), without considering that I worked overtime until two o'clock yesterday (considering the environment and special circumstances).

Then I will be very unhappy.

"The right thing is not the right person", "I don't know when to say something", "I say something unpleasant", "I speak more straight", all these expressions actually come from the speaker's caution, lest he hurt the other party, and lest he mess up the relationship between the two parties, but the seriousness of the problem has reached the level where he cannot but say it, and the speaker can only say it to that person as politely, decently, and less aggressively as possible, taking the responsibility on himself, denying his ability to speak and even denying his qualification to criticize.

Think about it, is there a person who is not qualified to admonish and say things like "the right thing is not the right person"? No, at least this speaker is on the morally righteous side, and the purpose of the speaker is to try to maintain justice. People who hear this sentence should reflect on whether they have done anything wrong, and if not, they should explain or even defend their rights, but without any reflection, they are directly annoyed by the fact that the speaker is right about things and not people, which seems to me to be the so-called "ignorance".

If you are late for work once, you should be forgiven, so how should someone who is never late be treated? Further, how many times is it not forgiven to be late? How much is the difference between three and four times?

People who are late three times must think they deserve to be forgiven too much. Is it a lot better to be late twice than to be late three times? Those who are late three times will certainly disagree.

You see, when a person is late, he is no longer willing to admit the conclusion that being late is a mistake in itself, and criticism of being late is seen as an attack on the latecomer, which has nothing to do with saying "I'm not right about the person or not".

All language will have the possibility of being abused, and those behaviors that start with "the right thing is not the right person", "I don't know when to say it", "I say something unpleasant", "I speak more straightly", disgusting and degrading behaviors are to be denied, but what we deny is those disgusting words that demean people, not "right things and not right people", "I don't know when to say something wrong", "I don't know what to say", "I say something unpleasant", "I speak straighter".

"Wrong thing, not right person" should be interpreted as "not scared person", the speaker criticizes this matter, but the speaker does not want to completely deny the person who did this thing because of this matter.