Who is a non good and no evil theorist There is no good or evil in human nature

In China, the first to advocate the "theory of no good and no evil" was the middle of the Warring States period. He believes that there is no good or evil in human nature, and that people are born with neither good nor evil, and that good and evil are caused by the social environment. So he said:

Sex without goodness and without goodness ......Sex is like turbulent water, and if it is decided to the east, it will flow east, and if it is decided to go west, it will flow west. Human nature is not divided into good and bad, and water is not divided into things. Foreign representatives of this view first recommend the British modern thinker Locke's white paper theory.

This theory holds that at the beginning of human beings, the human heart is as empty as a blank sheet of paper, and there is no question of good and evil at all. He believes that the psychological concepts and moral qualities of good and evil are caused by acquired factors, especially educational factors. In addition, the later American philosophers James and Dewey can also be said to be the goodness and evil theorists of sex.

Dewey stood on the standpoint of pragmatism, believing that goodness is by no means something mysterious and mysterious, it is only something that can satisfy people's needs, and it is a relative value judgment. Human nature has the possibility of developing into goodness, and as long as there is proper education, people can develop a good character.

Of course, Wang Yangming who said upstairs is also true.

Confucius had a point of view: "At the beginning of man, nature is good"; Lao Tzu advocated that "at the beginning of man, nature is evil"; Although Lao Tzu asserts:

At the beginning of man, his nature is evil", but Lao Tzu believes that people can become good after being educated, so I think that people in this world are affected by the acquired environment, there are good people and evil people; Although not everyone is a good person, there are good people; I think I can believe that the percentage of people depends on the person.

Everything in the world is manifested and changed by consciousness, and except for the original mind, which is immortal, all other thoughts arise from desire, jealousy, vanity, greed, and so on. And all these thoughts will be scattered due to karma, so why cling, all gains and losses will take their course. Everything in the world is impermanent, and thoughts are impermanent, so everything can conform to the way of heaven, and don't cling to the gains and losses of the side rocks, which will only increase your troubles.

There is no right or wrong in nature, right and wrong are only defined by human beings themselves, and what is beneficial to human beings is defined as good, and what is unfavorable to human beings is defined as evil, which is also the law of the world. The reason why people have emotions such as anger is because people are obsessed with their own perception that they are right and think that others are wrong, and there is no absolute truth in this world.

All of everyone's actions and minds are a natural phenomenon, and there is no right or wrong. Just like windy and rainy natural disasters and man-made disasters** What is right and wrong, right and wrong are only for human cognition, and there is no difference between right and wrong in the avenue, if human beings can really understand this, they will just conform to the laws of the world, right and wrong, good and evil, and will not be attached to those who are really good and evil, right and wrong, and there will be no anger and so many emotions to argue with people.

There is no good or evil in human nature, it is the good and evil, good and bad, that people distinguish according to their own likes and dislikes. It is emotional, and it cannot be leaked to exist independently. Good and evil are produced under the social attributes of people and are determined by people's ethics and morality.

There is no good or evil in nature, only the laws of survival. Raising cubs and preying on prey is just for the continuation and survival of genes. Man, like other animals and stones, exists only for the sake of being.

There is no difference between the rich and the poor in human nature, and they also have primitive desires, as well as the so-called good and evil of people. However, the environment determines the degree of manifestation of good and evil in the end, and those who are more constrained by human ethics and morality show goodness. When the attributes of nature prevail, they show the evil tendency to seek advantage and avoid harm.

Therefore, the culture of a civilization plays a decisive role in the performance of human beings. Human development in different regions is determined by their culture, which in turn is determined by their environment. Man is a product of his environment.

Wealth and poverty are a relative concept, and the rich in ancient times did not have the nourishment of the modern poor. Wealth and poverty are more about psychological feelings than material possessions. A person's happiness should come from whether he is living the life he longs for, not how much money he has.

Money is just a tool to achieve the goal, and asking for money is only to buy a bigger house, a car, and satisfy one's own desires. So if you want to be happy, you have to set your sights on what kind of life you want to have. Make it concrete, achieve it in the same way, and you will be happier as the goal is achieved little by little.

Don't keep your eyes on money, money will change with the environment and have different attributes. Following the money will make you forget your fundamental goal, and in the end you will earn money but lose the ability to be happy.

At the same time, because rich and poor are a relative concept, the troubles and happiness of the poor and the rich are basically the same. It's just that the content of the troubles is different. If you want to be more happy, you can only change your mindset. Only you can make you happy, and no one else can help you.

All I could think of might have nothing to do with the books I read, but they all came to my brain while I was reading. My thoughts today may be contradictory to my thoughts tomorrow, but they are also from the same brain. I just keep a faithful record of my thought process, because I will grow so I will change.

I don't guarantee that my ideas are correct, and I don't expect him to be approved by certain people, who are just my quest for the truth. Sometimes I may deviate from the truth, but my heart is always directed towards Him, and necessary detours cannot be avoided. In the same way, the truth may only get me infinitely closer, but never reach.

Regarding the meaning of "human nature has good and evil, good and evil are raised":

It means that there are two aspects of human nature, good and evil, and whether good or evil is cultivated depends on which aspect it is cultivated.

This sentence comes from the Eastern Han Dynasty Wang Chong's "On Balance and Recklessness", Zhou Renshishuo thought that human nature has good and evil, and the goodness of people is good and good; Malignant, and if it is raised, it will be evil. In this way, the temperament has its own yin and yang, and good and evil are nurtured.

But what exactly is human nature?

There is no one answer that everyone can agree with. There are countless theories about human nature, but they can be broadly divided into four categories: the theory of sexual goodness; Sexual Evil; There is a theory that sex is good and evil; There is no such thing as good or evil in sex.

In fact, the most fierce and representative debate on human nature is the theory of sexual goodness and sexual evil. Since the dawn of human civilization, the debate about whether human nature is good or evil has never stopped.

For a long time, the two schools of thought that are the most mainstream theories of human nature, the theory of sexual goodness and the theory of sexual evil, have been debated endlessly. Both factions have their own unique opinions and grounds, and both are trying to convince each other, but in the end, neither can convince the other. However, unilaterally defining human nature in terms of good or evil is too one-sided, like the two sides of a coin, the two are interdependent and indispensable.

Neither can we depart from evil, but simply define human nature by good; We can't put aside goodness and simply use evil to interpret human nature. It can be said that human nature is a mixture of good and evil, and there is no distinction between good and evil in human nature. Good and evil are the main contradictions of human nature, and the opposition between good and evil is the same in human nature.

Therefore, both the theory of sexual goodness and the theory of sexual evil are one-sided opinions, and it is difficult to fully interpret human nature.

Therefore, the definition of human nature has always been difficult to conclusive, and there is no unified standard.