When interviewing in a public institution, how to grasp the psychology of the examiner?

I think it is not easy to grasp the psychology of the examiner, unless you often interview, after all, everyone is different, and the value will be different, I think in the interview, you just need to show the most true self, good luck!

Hello, Zhonggong Education is at your service.

First, the psychology of merit.

Many candidates are worried about being embarrassed by the examiner during the interview process, thinking that the examiner is sitting here to "pick thorns" for the candidates, but in fact, the examiner comes to this examination room to select talents who meet the needs of the position. Therefore, during the interview process, the examiner will combine personal experience and requirements for the position to find out which of the different advantages of each candidate meet their own requirements, and select outstanding talents that meet their own understanding during the interview process. And from the perspective of the current social world, in fact, the examiners are also "willing to be Bole" in the interview, and are willing to provide opportunities for young people.

Second, the psychology of superiority.

The interview examiner group is often composed of the leaders of the recruiting unit, the head of the personnel organization department, the interview experts, the university teachers and other personnel, these examiners are leaders, experts or scholars with rich experience, and in the interview, because they are in a dominant position and have a condescending advantage psychology.

In the face of this psychology of the examiner, candidates should not be humble or arrogant, and treat them calmly with a normal heart. During the interview process, you should not only fully show your talents, but also show humility, sincerity, and politeness to conform to the examiner's psychology.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask questions from Zhonggong Education Enterprises.

The most important thing is self-confidence.

In the interview of civil servants and public institutions, the examiner requires the candidate's appearance to be simple, neat, generous, well-dressed, and standardized. After he passes the written examination for civil servants and public institutions, he will have an interview, and everyone must prepare carefully when taking the interview test, if the preparation is not sufficient, it is still very likely that he will not be admitted. Then your written test results will be invalidated, so you must prepare in advance when you interview.

In addition to preparing for the content of the exam, one of the criteria for the interview is the candidate's appearance and clothing requirements. <>

Because civil servants and interviewers in public institutions are generally older, they will prefer some more dignified images, so candidates must dress more dignified and appropriate during the interview. Try not to wear brightly colored clothes and do not dye your hair. It's best to tie your hair in a ponytail or ball, and if you don't want to tie your hair, try to pin your hair behind your ears to look more energetic and leave a better impression on the interviewer.

You don't have to blindly pursue the best clothes during the interview, as long as you can ensure that you are dignified and decent, it is best to choose more suitable clothes, do not wear a much larger suit, otherwise it will make the whole person look very sloppy and spiritless. Try not to wear shorts and slippers for boys during interviews, and try not to wear skirts and sandals that are too short for girls. When you are interviewing, you must relax your mind, don't be too nervous, keep your speech slow, speak clearly, and smile, so that the interviewers can have a better first impression of yourself and your interview results will be better.

In fact, appearance is secondary, the most important thing is their business ability, if the business ability passes, the appearance is slightly worse will not affect their overall performance. I also hope that everyone can get a good score in the interview and successfully go ashore.

The face should be neat, the hair should not be messy, the girl should wear light makeup, and the clothes should be decent, not to give people a very sloppy feeling.

To ensure a dignified appearance, the clothes should be neat and clean, generous and decent, the makeup should not be heavy and glamorous, you can wear light makeup, the behavior should be elegant and generous, not frizzy, polite, the eyes should be firm, and the questions raised by the examiner should be accurately conveyed, and your strength and attitude should be conveyed.

Candidates with a good external image are needed, and they need candidates to dress neatly, not required to wear many and expensive clothes, but they need to dress appropriately, and do not wear too bright clothes, and the external image must be neat and tidy, which can give the examiner a good image.

In terms of image, it is required to have a neat appearance, decent appearance, a good first impression is very important, do not wear more gorgeous outfits, low-key and simple, very formal.

Candidates should dress appropriately before the exam and not be too formal or too casual. And the hairstyle should be conservative. Try not to dye your hair. If you can do without makeup, try not to wear makeup. Speak and behave appropriately.

Interview skills for public institution exams: Strategies for responding to the situation when examining the sensitive officer.

Interview skills for business units: Strategies for the examiner to ask about the situation.

1. Relax your mind.

As a test taker, don't be nervous or afraid when facing the examiner's "questioning", and try to keep yourself calm and calm. Because sometimes the examiner's questioning is invisibly testing the candidate's heart and pants quality, which is also the key content that affects the candidate's interview performance. In fact, the examiner's questioning is to select as many all-round talents as possible, and from a certain point of view, it is the examiner's care and love for the candidates, as long as the candidates think carefully.

Take the test, answer calmly, not only will not deduct points, but also have the opportunity to increase your scores.

2. Cooperate with the examiner with a humble attitude.

We found that when the examiner asked questions, some candidates would look at a loss, and even called on Najan to directly "I have nothing to add" without thinking; Some candidates are absent-minded, and when they ask questions, they will answer questions that are not what they asked, and they will deviate from the question'Phenomenon; There is also a type of candidate who wants to take the opportunity to show themselves and exaggerate in the follow-up question, which instead arouses the disgust of the examiner. The correct way to deal with it should be to cooperate with the examiner in attitude and follow the requirements of the examiner.

Give people the power to change the future.

Go on, but don't easily change your way of thinking when answering the questions, and think about it carefully.

Answer carefully. 3. Think before answering the questions.

In addition to practicing more to speak in public, candidates should also pay attention to learning to think for 20 seconds before answering the questions, and quickly list the outline of the answers on the paper, so that no matter the examiner.

No matter how you ask questions, you can calmly respond to the main points in the outline.

Move 1: Defeat "Circle One" with confidence - I'm not good enough.

This is the most common question in interview preparation, the first contact with the interview - nervous and nervous; After the initial understanding - I feel that it is so difficult to reflect the blank brain of the brain; After trying to prepare, I can't understand the question, I can't answer the content, and I can't answer the ...... as well as othersIn short, the interview is too difficult, I'm afraid I can't do it. This strange circle plagues most candidates, which is actually the sequelae of our Chinese-style "other people's children" education model, in fact, at this time, if you review carefully without distraction, the progress may be fast; If you look at the results of our learning these days, you can see your own progress; If you don't always compare your own shortcomings with the strengths of others, you will naturally see your own shining points. Therefore, self-confidence is the psychological cornerstone of interview preparation, and we should lay this first step and believe that we are good enough!

Move 2: Accurate positioning to defeat the "Strange Circle 2" - tall.

In the interview, many students are willing to memorize some famous quotes and lofty sentences in order to show their ** thinking. This is actually a misunderstanding, the real ** thinking, when we think about any problem and solve any problem, we must not think and do it from the perspective of the ego; Instead, we should consider comprehensiveness and use dialectical thinking, so that we can naturally put an end to a single perspective and ego consciousness. Therefore, to really position ourselves on the topic requires our identity and role, and to see the problem dialectically, in order to truly have a height, rather than an empty high-pitched voice.

Trick 3: For the analysis to defeat the "strange circle three" - the same I believe that many students who have been preparing for a period of time will have an illusion, feeling that the questions are almost the same, and the questions are not much different, so many students think that they may have learned and will answer the questions, but in fact, this similarity is just an illusion, because everyone only stays in the process and the big steps in the answer, and does not combine the specific details to analyze, so everyone feels that it will be, it is precisely the big problem, and it does not really reach the point. Therefore, when we answer questions, we must analyze the questions in a targeted manner in order to answer the characteristics and personality.

1. The examiner will strictly follow the scoring criteria 100%.

Score? A: No, it won't. Even if there were, the examiner would not follow this standard seriously.

In fact, there is a strong subjectivity in the scoring of interviews. Most of the interviewers are subjective, which is actually due to the breadth and profundity of the Chinese language and the diversity of individual candidates. Of course, not following a uniform standard does not mean messing around, and every examiner has a scale in their hearts and personal preferences.

So what should candidates do? After reading the following follow-up question analysis, all candidates will know. I think every candidate also has a scale in their hearts.

2. Generally speaking, what do examiners pay most attention to?

External aspects: 1. Grooming and demeanor; 2. The voice is loud; 3. Control of answering time, speaking speed, pause, etc. (To put it simply, it's comfortable, and the examiner doesn't have to be nitpicky.) )

Internal aspects: 1. Whether the examination question is clear (situation, role, object characteristics, etc.); 2. Whether the logic is clear (the use of logical words, etc., the internal logic of the topic, etc.); 3. Whether the core grasp of the topic is accurate (whether the key points are prominent in the contradictory grasping, etc.); 4. Whether there are signs of routine answering (the answer form has no content, and it is rigid); 5. Whether the answer is comprehensive (whether the question is comprehensively solved); 6. Whether some measures are in line with reality (down-to-earth and realistic); 7. Whether there are unique insights in the answer (there are shining points); 8. Whether the language is concise and clear (such as whether there are words such as um, oh, etc.). (To put it simply, it is in line with the meaning of the topic, with insights and thoughts).

3. Does the interview language need to be very standard?

A: Of course not. The interview language is too standard, and although the expression efficiency is very high, there is a strong sense of alienation, which is not cordial enough and does not meet the characteristics of the interview.

And if the language is very colloquial, although it is very cordial, but the expression efficiency becomes low, and it is not good. Therefore, the best expression is the form of expression that is somewhere between standard and colloquial.

1. Don't repeat

In the interview room, candidates are prone to nervousness. There will be a blank brain or even a short circuit. In order to avoid the embarrassment of empty space, many candidates will unconsciously repeat the previous sentence or the last few words to buy time for the next sentence to think.

But it can make the listener extremely uncomfortable and even impatient.

Candidates are advised to pause rather than repeat. Think about it and say it again, and express it coherently and completely. Like many speeches, the pace of speech is a little slower, the pauses are a little longer, and the listener will not get bored.

2. Don't "cannon".

"Cannonball" style of speech can add interest and liven up the atmosphere in daily chat. But it is a big taboo in civil service interviews. It may give the examiner a sense of oppression, and even an illusion of "like being beaten".

A quiet and harmonious atmosphere in the examination room is more suitable for the communication between candidates and examiners.

3. Don't endorse

The "cannon" style of speech feels too strong, while the "endorsement" style of speech makes people feel distracted. The usual manifestation is that there is no eye contact with the examiner, and the eyes are turned up and down, left and right.

In fact, this situation is mostly due to nervousness. Candidates struggle to recall the outline constructed in their brains for fear of missing a key point. This gives people a sense of immaturity, like a student who is memorizing a text, rather than an independent, mature and stable adult.

4. Don't make small movements

In extremely stressful situations, some candidates will be too cramped or even a little stiff, and some candidates will try to break this deadlock by relaxing their bodies or expressions, but it will backfire.

Small actions such as raising eyebrows, glancing at the examiner, shaking legs, and turning the pen appear frequently, which will make the examiner feel that the candidate's attitude is not correct, which will greatly lower the examiner's impression score.

Some of the situations that examiners most dislike during civil service interviews are:

1. I have nothing to say.

This is the most unacceptable for examiners, but it is also the minefield that candidates are most willing to step on. Because many candidates may not have a clear grasp of the question in the process of answering the question, they can't find the key points of the answer, they feel that they have nothing to say, and they feel that if they can't answer a question for a few minutes, they will affect their test results, so they will have nothing to say, and hope to say more, but they don't know that the more verbose they are, the more disgusting they are.

2. Make a report.

The outstanding problems of such candidates are that the intonation does not fluctuate, the eyes do not communicate with the examiner when answering the questions, and they are willing to hold up the question book or straw paper and talk to themselves. In fact, most of these behaviors are imperceptibly embodied by the candidates themselves, and they are not conscious. You must show yourself to the examiner during the interview, but this kind of candidate completely ignores the examiner and puts the examiner in the opposite direction of himself, and naturally he will not be recognized by the examiner.

3. Excessively lofty.

This kind of candidate has an extreme idea, thinking that the content of the answer must be like the host of the news broadcast, the content is lofty, and it is best to say something that others cannot understand, so as to highlight their theoretical literacy. This point of view is actually very strange, tall things may not be suitable for everyone, if the theoretical foundation is really good, these things do not need to be rigid, but imperceptibly exist in the answer, will not appear abrupt and stiff. However, most candidates lack a theoretical foundation, and more are rigid and rigid, which makes the examiner feel like memorizing.

Naturally, the examiner will not approve of such a lofty answer.