Why is the universe so similar to life?

Because the universe is produced by many living beings, just like people often say, "many living forms can produce the universe, but the universe does not necessarily produce many living forms", just because there are more living forms there will be such an existence as the universe, so the universe and life forms are very similar.

Because the universe is also alive. According to Kardashov's setting, the universe can be constantly upgraded, just like human beings, from birth to growth to final decay.

Perhaps the universe is a living body, and we live in this living body called the universe, a leaf, a Bodhi, a flower, a world, this conjecture is also possible.

As for the topic of what the universe gave birth to life, I personally believe that the universe gave birth to life for the regeneration of energy and matter that can be burned. Why? Because the visible matter in the universe is divided into two types, one is the energy matter that can be burned naturally, which can be collectively referred to as the organic matter; The second is substances that cannot be burned naturally, which can be collectively referred to as inorganic substances.

Throughout the universe, the embodiment of the cyclic movement of matter is the cyclical change process of the transformation of matter from the organic world to the inorganic world, and then from the inorganic world to the organic world. The process of transformation from organic matter to inorganic matter is a phenomenon realized by the means of continuous burning of countless stars in the universe, and the process of transformation from inorganic matter to organic matter is a phenomenon realized by means of continuous survival and evolution of the biosphere.

Because life is the carrier of energy substances that can be burned by regeneration, and is the only natural means to continuously produce and manufacture substances in the organic world, the process of photosynthesis in the plant sphere is essentially the expression process of the conversion of inorganic matter to organic matter, the process of growing and growing in animals and plants, and the performance process of producing energy substances that can be burned, the natural death of animals and plants in each generation, and the process of eating food and digesting food in the animal circle.

In essence, it is the expressive process of making energy matter. It can be seen that the transformation of inorganic matter to organic matter is the embodiment of the means of continuous survival and evolution of life, and it is also the concrete manifestation of the regeneration of combustible energy matter. Life is a miracle in the universe, but as far as our current understanding of life and the evolution of the universe is concerned, it is impossible to have "teleology", because the evolution of the universe has no will, and the evolution of life has no will.

If there is a supernatural will design, then the designer is really clumsy, and it is impossible to reach the level of "creator".

Therefore, the universe gave birth to life in order to regenerate energy matter that can be burned. This is the mystery of the existence of life in the universe. I wonder if this is accurate?

Because there are conditions in the universe for the birth of life, and then life will be formed, so the universe will produce life.

It is also an accident that life arises in the universe, and the various atoms in the universe form complex compounds under the right circumstances, which eventually form life.

If the universe cannot produce life, then how lonely and lonely the universe is.

The universe exists for life, and since there is life, there is a corresponding space corresponding to it.

There is matter and antimatter in the universe, time exists only in the material world, and there is no time in the antimatter world.

There is a supernatural soul (God) in the universe, and it is this supernatural soul who creates these.

There are beings who are more intelligent than human beings, such as gods, gods, Buddhas, and immortals, and these are not legends.

Let me start with my opinion. I think that life arises from non-living matter, and that life is a way of material existence and movement, and it is an advanced form of material existence and movement. The generation of life first comes from the agglomeration of matter, that is, first of all, matter is connected, combined and gathered with each other through a certain process or action.

Aggregation produces different compounds, different substances have different functions, and compounds with different functions are recombined. The second process is functional differentiation, that is, the accumulation of substances to form a larger individual, and the division of labor within the individual. This process begins with the simplest and primitive differentiation and now goes through a long process of various organs and cells of human beings.

Third, the highest form of division of labor has changed from the division of labor within living individuals to the division of labor between living individuals, just like human beings, some people specialize in the production of food, some people specialize in the production of clothes, etc. Earth's earliest creatures can answer half of this question! However, the Buddha said that everything has life!

It's not for nothing.

Life exists in various forms, there are human-like animals and advanced animals that can have thoughts, there are plants, etc., of course, a stone and a mountain can also be regarded as a life form, but our definition of life is still very narrow!

As far as our earth is concerned, the earth, can give birth to life, and the formation of life requires certain conditions, and there is no life similar to the earth on other planets (there is no life as currently known to man), but it does not mean that there is no life! Maybe exist in some other way. There are planets similar to life on Earth in the depths of space, perhaps far away!

So is the existence of life on Earth inevitable or accidental?

Why is the Earth the only planet in the solar system capable of supporting life? Of course, we can explain that the earth has such conditions! If there are such conditions on other planets, similar life forms will form!

We can also think of the galaxies in the entire universe as life forms, and the various life forms born in the universe, the sun, the earth, and various galaxies are just one form of life in the universe! Galaxies form in infancy and decline in their infancy. Hope to adopt.

In fact, it stands to reason that there should be no life in the universe, because this is a negative entropy process. But life still appeared in the universe, which seems logical, but in fact it is contrary to the second law of thermodynamics. We can only guess that in the process of random combination of various organic molecules, local negative entropy is obtained at the cost of high entropy.

With the continuous synthesis of organic matter, organic macromolecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, etc., are obtained. After a series of complex chemical changes, life is formed.

Yes Because the universe is very large, it is the same as the probability of life on Earth in terms of probability, so there is. As for the so-called evaluation of the signs of life, water, atmosphere, and other factors are considered certain, you can't say that people can't live without these, but you can't say that other life forms must be the same as people, they may not need to breathe air, they don't use water, but there are other alternatives.

There are about 300 billion stars in the Milky Way, and a star must exist for more than 5 billion years to provide enough time for intelligent life to occur, and there are about 1 billion such stars in the Milky Way. With enough time, life cannot live on shining stars, it must live on planets, so stars must have planets orbiting it, and scientists estimate and calculate that there may be 500 million stars with planets.

The existence of life on any planet must meet the following 5 conditions at the same time:

First, there must be basic elements that make up life on the planet, such as: carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, calcium, etc.

Second: there should be proper light and heat on the planet.

Fourth: air with the right amount of oxygen.

Fifth: There should be enough time for this planet to be created.

If you don't find it, you don't find it. When we find out in the future, we will argue again.

The answer is yes, it's just not discovered yet. From the perspective of life evolution, the earth was born only 4.5 billion years ago, so the evolution of life on the earth is up to 4.5 billion years, then, there are many planets in the vast universe that are older than the earth and suitable for life evolution, some people have calculated that there are about 3 billion galaxies in the universe (galaxies like the Milky Way, some large and some small) and each galaxy has about 1,000 planets suitable for life

Theoretically, however, it has not yet been confirmed.

The basis for the birth of life is organic matter, and organic matter must be composed of at least oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon and other elements. Then, there are certainly not a few planets in the universe that have these elements, as long as there are suitable conditions, these elements can be combined into organic matter, and then these organic matter is constantly evolving, and finally life is born.

The evolution of life on Earth is an example:

Elements such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon on the earth form proteins under the action of the sun's ultraviolet rays and thunderstorms; It is also a coincidence that the earth is at the right distance from the sun, so there is life. Life then evolves further due to the constraints of the environment. Then after n billion years of evolution, humans were born.

There are trillions of planets in the universe, so there must be a few in the universe to find a place with similar geographical conditions to the earth. Therefore, we cannot say that there are no life forms other than the earth.

According to China Radio International, according to Mars expert Marcus Landgraff, "life is really possible" on the red planet MarsIn a recent interview with dpap news agency in Darmstadt, the president of the German Mars Society said that scientific observations have proven that bacteria can survive in the harsh environment on Mars.

Landgraff believes that the biggest threat to life on Mars is ultraviolet light. These ultraviolet rays are not filtered out by the ozone layer in the atmosphere, as is the case on Earth. "Anything that is exposed to ultraviolet rays will be burned clean".

Bacteria, however, can survive in this environment. The scientist said that over the past few years they have found such bacteria in several places on the planet. In the permafrost of Siberia, for example, bacteria have been found hiding under ice several meters deep, where light barely penetrates.

"Bacteria are there to sustain life through photosynthesis, much like on Mars," Landgraff said. ”

Scientists believe that it is quite possible that there will be an exchange of life between Earth and Mars. "We regularly record the impact of Martian meteorites on Earth, and at the same time Earth rocks have been found on Mars," he said.

The scientist believes that bacteria can carry out "interstellar travel" in this way unscathedLandgraff uses this to illustrate the theory that life on Earth could be superior to Mars.

The environment on Mars deteriorated dramatically 3.8 billion years ago, and it was at this time that the first life appeared on Earth. (

Is there any other life in the universe? See what the scientists say!

Does extraterrestrial life exist? Scientists believe that the universe is full of life, and the dandelion theory is the answer.

It depends on what your definition of life is, and fire and viruses are similar.