If Confucius had beaten and scolded a student, could he have revoked his title of educator?

Confucius was an educator, and in ancient times, it was common sense to beat and scold students, and teachers also had precepts, so the ancients could not be judged by modern rules.

I think this matter should depend on the degree of beating and scolding of the child, and I don't think there is any need to revoke his title of educator if it does not cause physical and mental harm to the child.

I don't think it's okay, because it's the ancient people who taught everyone, and you can't use modern ideas to morally kidnap the ancient saints.

Beating and scolding in another sense is also the meaning of hating iron.

Confucius paid attention to teaching students according to their aptitude, and this is also teaching students according to their aptitude now.

It can be regarded as a way to educate children, but they are all taught according to their aptitude, although there are corporal punishment, beating, scolding, and ridicule, but education is indeed possible.

Everyone has a different opinion, you think that beating and scolding education is good, and if you think it is bad, he is not good, but still don't hit the child.

Confucius completely punished students, beat and scolded students, laughed at students, and despised students, that is, teaching students according to their aptitude.

Great educators are often able to make all educational behaviors at their fingertips.

For students, for the educated, some people just do it to be addicted.

No, in fact, it should be said that the content contained in this sentence is more complicated, for students, for those who are educated.

Naturally, it shouldn't be, and he did scold students, and beating and scolding is also a manifestation of the depth of love.

No, Confucius was originally the founder of educators, so he was the pioneer, and beating and scolding was just a compilation.

I have also beaten and scolded students, laughed at students, and despised students, that is, teaching students according to their aptitude.

Hitting and scolding a student should not be seen simply as a criterion for whether or not a good teacher is a good teacher, of course, violence is not encouraged, but sometimes it is not a universal evil.

In fact, it should be called that the content contained in this sentence is more complicated, for students, for the educated, some people are the kind of feeling that they can only be addicted to doing it, is Li Yunlong the same as selling a dozen? Perhaps the effect is better, and she needs such an education method and education pattern.

For students, for those who are educated, there are lessons to be learned.