I m a motor vehicle and a pedestrian in traffic, so I should pay for any expense

1. You are speeding by 50. 2. You are observant. 3. In view of the first two items, you are primarily responsible.

4. The expenses of both parties shall be paid in advance by the driver of the motor vehicle, and after the injured person is discharged from the hospital, it will be shared according to the size of the responsibilities of both parties. 5. If you do not accept the division of responsibilities made by the traffic police, you can bypass the traffic police and file a lawsuit directly with the court where the incident occurred. 6. You don't have to worry about the injured lying in the hospital and refusing to come out.

The hospital will make a correct diagnosis of the injured person's condition, if the hospital thinks that the injured person has been **, then you do not need to bear the medical expenses from the day the hospital determines **, he cheats, and the cost of being in the hospital is borne by himself.

If the traffic police judge you are mainly responsible, then you should be responsible, it is best to negotiate privately with the injured or their families, and it is best to settle the amount of money at one time. It's better to spend a little more money at one time, and if he doesn't get stronger in the hospital, you can also let go of the stones in your heart early.

You pay 100% full responsibility, go to the hospital more often, don't go empty-handed, have a good attitude, be sincere, in a word, it is constantly humble, all blame you, it's all your fault, keep annoying him, and then it's hot, and from time to time make him feel that you are very honest, and the family conditions are not too good, it is best to mobilize the female family to go into battle In this way, there will be a lot of less blood

No. Because it is a traffic accident with a non-motorized vehicle, you have to bear an extra 20% responsibility. For example, if you should bear 50% responsibility, you need to add 20%.

At that time, the insurance company will issue relevant documents after the liability is determined. All in all, there will be losses in the event of a traffic accident, but it should be noted that you must not privately promise an agreement with the person who caused the accident, let alone privately subsidize money, because this insurance company will not recognize.

Basically, depending on the responsibility, it is determined that whose responsibility is greater, according to what you said, you are driving on the non-motor vehicle lane by the motor vehicle, then it is your responsibility, isn't there insurance? There isn't much to lose.

No. According to the relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, which laws and regulations were violated by the parties, the main reasons for the accident in this accident, etc., cannot be judged by personal subjective will.

Supplement: medical expenses, diagnosis and treatment fees, hospitalization expenses, hospital meal subsidies, necessary and reasonable follow-up expenses, nutrition expenses. Disability compensation, disability assistive device expenses, nursing expenses, ** expenses, transportation expenses, lost work expenses, and solatium for moral damages borne by the insured in accordance with court judgments or mediation.

If the above compensation items are involved, you can claim compensation in the future, and if the parties cannot negotiate a settlement, you can also directly sue the court.

It mainly depends on who violates the provisions of the traffic law. Under normal circumstances, the motor vehicle bears 10% of the responsibility without liability, mainly considering the so-called "people-oriented".

No, the division of accident liability is based on the principle of presumption of fault, and the compensation liability is first compensated by the motor vehicle within the limit of 110,000 yuan for death and disability in compulsory traffic insurance, 10,000 yuan for medical treatment, and 2,000 yuan for property, and the insufficient part is shared according to the responsibility, and the motor vehicle bears about 10% more.

I'm not a lawyer, but I know not necessarily. It depends on whose responsibility it is, and the traffic police must investigate the scene and make a determination of responsibility, if a pedestrian violates traffic rules and causes a traffic accident, the motor vehicle may not be fully responsible.

No, it depends on whether the pedestrian clearly has a zebra crossing, an underpass, a pedestrian bridge, and does not walk, deliberately crossing the road.

The electric car should not be a motor vehicle, and there should be nothing to do with your compensation and whether you are pregnant, you paid the ** fee If the hospitalization is your payment fee, you can take the hospitalization payment bill to prove it, if you give her money directly, if there is a third party present at that time, you can let him serve as a witness, if you claim that there are other expenses and not how much he claims can support how much, it is recommended to negotiate a solution, communicate more with the victim, lower your mentality, have a better attitude, save time and money. If you really meet a master who is not very easy to entangle, you can only respond to the lawsuit.

The responsibility for the accident shall be determined by the traffic police after investigating the scene in accordance with the law. It is necessary to consider the violation of the traffic law between the two parties and the cause of the accident.

If the loss of a traffic accident is intentionally caused by a non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian, the motor vehicle party shall not be liable for the damage caused by the traffic accident.

In the event of a traffic accident between a motor vehicle, a non-motor vehicle or a pedestrian, the motor vehicle shall be liable for the traffic accident damages; However, if there is evidence to prove that a non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian has violated road traffic safety laws and regulations, and the motor vehicle driver has taken necessary measures to deal with it, the liability of the motor vehicle party for damages shall be reduced. The proportion of reduction of liability for motor vehicle damage shall be implemented in accordance with the following provisions:

1. If non-motor vehicles and pedestrians bear full responsibility for the accident, the liability for damages shall be reduced by 80%-90%;

2. If non-motor vehicles and pedestrians bear the main responsibility for the accident, the liability for damages shall be reduced by 60%-70%;

3. If non-motor vehicles and pedestrians bear the same responsibility for the accident, the liability for damages shall be reduced by 40%-50%;

4. If non-motor vehicles and pedestrians bear secondary responsibility for accidents, the liability for damages shall be reduced by 20% to 30%.

According to Article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law, if a traffic accident occurs between a motor vehicle and a pedestrian, the insurance company shall pay compensation in the compulsory traffic insurance. Therefore, no matter how the liability is divided, the insurance company will lose money, provided that the motor vehicle has compulsory insurance. Generally speaking, if the pedestrian is at fault, and the motor vehicle is not obviously at fault, the traffic police will generally assume secondary liability for the motor vehicle did not pay attention to avoid the pedestrian, the purpose is to let the insurance company lose money within the limit of compulsory insurance insurance, compulsory insurance only distinguishes between responsibility and non-responsibility, does not distinguish the size of responsibility, and the medical expenses are up to 10,000. The maximum compensation for the liability death and disability items (nursing and lost work disability compensation, etc.) is 110,000, while the limit of no liability is relatively small, 1,000 and 10,000 respectively.

If the traffic police determine that the motor vehicle is not responsible and the pedestrian is fully responsible, the insurance company will assess the damage for the injured pedestrian and pay up to 1,000 for medical expenses and up to 10,000 for other expenses, depending on the size of your actual loss. Since the pedestrian is fully responsible, the remaining losses can only be borne by the pedestrian himself.

It is impossible for a motor vehicle to be completely free of liability, and it needs to bear at least 10% of the responsibility according to the laws of our country.

If your friend bai is walking on the pedestrian zebra crossing, du

It's just that. If there are too many vehicles or the traffic lights turn green, or other reasons, your friend is injured while standing on the double yellow line in the middle of the genus waiting to cross the road, and the main responsibility is borne by the motor vehicle. If you cross the road, it depends on the situation and the severity of the injury. The specific division of accident responsibility is mainly determined by the traffic police brigade, and it can be within a reasonable range.

It can't be said that you shouldn't have walked across the overpass. Many wide roads have railings in the middle or provide a certain amount of space for pedestrians to cross the road to avoid traffic accidents, and most of the responsibility for your friend's injury within this space is borne by the motor vehicle.

According to the accident handling procedures, the traffic management department of the public security organ shall be based on the behavior of the parties to the road traffic.

The role played by the accident and the severity of the fault determine the responsibility of the parties. It has nothing to do with whether the other party is a pedestrian or not, but at present, the traffic police law enforcement is biased towards pedestrians and maintains social harmony, and there is no way.

After the police are called, the traffic police will make a comprehensive determination based on the specific circumstances of the source at the scene.

Traffic Accident Procedure (2008).

Article 46 The traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the role of the party's conduct in the occurrence of a road traffic accident and the severity of the fault, determine the responsibility of the party.

1) If a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, it shall bear full responsibility;

2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault;

3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, none of the parties is liable.

If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

Provincial-level public security organs may, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, formulate specific detailed rules or standards for determining responsibility for road traffic accidents.

In the case you said, the insurance company will not bear all the costs of compensation for traffic accidents, but will make limited compensation according to the liability or non-liability of the compulsory traffic insuranceOther types of insurance will be compensated according to the amount of the project content agreed in the contract.

As long as the sum insured is not exceeded, the insurance company will basically bear it.