Why is the view of naturalists always pessimistic?

The naturalist's view is not always pessimistic. Naturalists believe that all things and phenomena in nature can be observed and verified by the scientific method, they emphasize objective observation and description of the natural world, and believe that everything in nature can be observed and controlled. This view does not necessarily imply pessimism, but some naturalists may be pessimistic about the future of human civilization and society because they believe that human actions and decisions can cause irreversible damage and harm to the natural world.

Some naturalists may argue that we are accelerating global climate change and biodiversity loss due to human destruction and overexploitation of the natural environment, which could lead to serious consequences such as extreme weather, resource shortages, species extinction, etc. This view may lead some naturalists to be pessimistic about the future of humanity, but there are also naturalists who believe that through advances in science and technology, we can find solutions to these problems and create a more sustainable and harmonious world.

Therefore, the view of naturalists is not always pessimistic, their view emphasizes the objective observation and description of the natural world, and believes that everything in the natural world can be ** and controlled, but they may be pessimistic about the future of human society because they believe that our actions and decisions may cause irreversible damage and harm to the natural world.

The state of life is like a pendulum, always swinging back and forth at both ends, boring when there is nothing to do, annoyed when there is something to do, and not happy when there is no happiness. When there is something to do, they are all worried, and when it comes to solving problems, no one will be happy to solve them. Although I always say that you should treat everything like a child, like a new challenge, no big deal, as a new and fun attempt, few adults do it, even if I know it.

Because of naturalism, you first have to admit birth, old age, sickness and death, and then you have to be old and die, and then these cycles are too fast, you are always dealing with these negativity, and you must have pessimistic emotions.

Naturalists, as the name suggests, go with the flow of everything and develop according to the laws of nature, and most people who hold such views go with the flow, will not refute, let alone find a way to reverse the situation, in the final analysis, they are controlled by fate and do not resist it.

To put it simply, philosophy is self-oriented, while psychology is other-minded.

But the number of words is too small, I'm afraid that you will think that I am perfunctory to you, and I will say two more nonsense.

The ultimate research goal of philosophy is the ultimate value of life, and this ultimate value is a symbol of self and must be realized by self, so philosophy is to a certain extent a problem of oneself, that is, what "I" want to do.

Whereas, psychology, as the name suggests, is the study of mental activity, which explains mental activity with human instincts, i.e., what is the motivation for me to do something.

To put it bluntly, philosophy subjectively imposes values that guide human behavior.

Whereas, psychologists study human nature as a way to explain the motivations of human behavior.

Philosophers study what people are supposed to do, while psychologists study the motivation of humans to do things.

It's a mess.

The most different research methods are the same, with psychology taking the empirical approach, philosophy or speculative.

Those who heal cannot heal themselves.

Philosophy governs the world. Psychotherapy of the individual.

Philosophy has been the mother of science since history. But as he grew more and more, his chassis became smaller and smaller, and he was almost reduced to homelessness. Psychology is one of the daughters of philosophy.

In ancient Greece, philosophy, science, psychology, etc., in the modern sense, were not separated. After knowing that Plato's student Aristotle classified the sciences, the differentiation of disciplines gradually began.

Philosophy now is basically metaphysics. The metaphysical is called the way, and the metaphysical is called the instrument.

Philosophy is the study of intangible, spiritual things. And the tangible is the object of physics research, so it seems that philosophy and psychology are very close because they both study the intangible.

However, there is a typical difference, and that is one of the greatest characteristics of psychology: empirical, experimental.

Whereas philosophy can be said to be transcendental, non-empirical.