The four views of prior intentionality, what does prior intentionality mean

1. The former act and the subsequent act of destroying evidence are to be treated as two separate acts, and the punishment for multiple crimes is combined.

2. The crime of intentional homicide is established if the act of destroying evidence later has indirect (or not necessarily intentional) intent (or not necessarily intentionality) to the death result of the previous act.

That's it; Otherwise, the crimes of attempted intentional homicide and negligence causing death are established.

3. Treat the two acts as one act, and treat the intent to dominate the act as a generalized intent, and find that the crime of intentional homicide has been completed.

4. Treat the two actions as one as a causal relationship.

As long as there is a considerable causal relationship, it is considered to be an intentional homicide. It should be considered that the causal relationship between the first act and the result has not been broken, and that the objectively occurring result is completely consistent with the result intended by the perpetrator, so it should be affirmed that the preceding and subsequent acts have established the completion of intentional homicide.

The four views of deliberate in advance are your views and pre-opinions before the event happens.

Prior intent, also known as Weber's general intent, refers to an intentional state of mind in which the perpetrator has prior knowledge of the overall facts of the crime and carries out the act. In the case of prior intentionality, it is judged to be intentional.

There are four very deliberate views, we can look for relevant theoretical books, and check the online e-books.

Ex ante intent is the symmetry of "ex post facto intent", which refers to a situation in which the perpetrator intentionally commits a certain harmful act, believing that he has changed the source to achieve his criminal purpose, but only realizes the original criminal intent when he or she commits other acts. In prior intent, the determination of intent is based on the intention of the perpetrator at the time of the act.

Ex-ante means before something happens or is dealt with, and it is concluded before it is annihilated. Interpreting the matter after the fact or after the deal has been settled. After-the-fact intent refers to the situation in which the perpetrator's criminal intent arises in the course of the development of the state of conjecture of the facts of the crime.

Intent after the fact does not mean that criminal intent arises after the completion of the whole fact, but rather criminal intent that arises after the perpetrator has committed the first act.

Prior intent is a type of criminal intent. Also known as Weber's generalized intention, it refers to an intentional state of mind in which the perpetrator carries out an act because he or she has prior knowledge of the facts of the crime as a whole.