The editor in chief of primary and secondary school Chinese textbooks responded to the question, how

In the response, Professor Wen Rumin mentioned that Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article was selected into primary and secondary school textbooks because some of the spirit in Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article is worthy of contemporary primary and secondary school students to learn, not because Cao Wenxuan is the editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbook. Mr. Cao Hui Yingxuan's articles are included in the textbooks of primary and secondary school students, which have been screened and reviewed at various levels, and there is no phenomenon of entrainment of private goods.

Wen Rumin, editor-in-chief of Chinese textbooks, explained the problem of Chinese textbooks with private goods questioned by netizens in recent days, and denied the problem of Chinese textbooks with private goods, he believes that the selection of Chinese texts has been reviewed and screened at various levels, and each text has been approved by many people before agreeing to be incorporated into the textbooks of primary and secondary schools, and everyone agrees that some of the spirit in this article is worth learning and learning from primary and secondary school students. Only then will it be agreed that this text will be included in the textbooks of primary and secondary schools, and there is no phenomenon of Chinese textbooks carrying private goods.

Wen Rumin has a very good literary literacy, has absolute authority in this regard, and the works he writes have profound educational significance, which is very in line with the development of students, and can accept public criticism. Some people use words to burn the fire on the Chinese textbooks without clear investigation, which is not the right behavior, and it also has ulterior motives. People need to take responsibility for their words, and they can't judge a person's right or wrong based on their subjective consciousness, they need to find the corresponding evidence.

Many people on the Internet have discussed this, some people think that the editor-in-chief does have favoritism, but there are also many people who think that Cao Wenxuan's works are not problematic. I believe that people need to look at culture with a tolerant heart, and not be too up-and-coming, and also need to pay attention to words when speaking online, and not be able to fill too many emotions in language, so as to build a harmonious network society. Education is a very important issue that plays a vital role in the development of young people, so it needs to be accessible to the general public.

Specifically, it means that this elective textbook does not care about private goods, indicating that he has not done such a thing, and he is innocent.

The editor-in-chief said that they have carried out strict checks on each layer when selecting textbooks, and there is no such thing as entrainment of private goods.

The editor-in-chief said that after dozens of rounds of review, it is generally impossible for one person to have the final say.

In this regard, Professor Wen Rumin mentioned that Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article was selected as a primary and secondary school textbook because some of the spirit in Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article is worthy of learning from contemporary primary and secondary school students, not because Cao Wenxuan is the editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbook. In addition, in response, Professor Wen Rumin also affirmed Mr. Cao Wenxuan's talent and the awards won by his articles, and affirmed that Mr. Cao Wenxuan's articles are worthy of being included in primary and secondary school textbooks, and Mr. Xuan's articles are included in primary and secondary school textbooks after layers of screening and review. Zheng Hui, a well-known writer, said that in the process of compiling the primary school Chinese textbooks of the People's Education Edition, a certain editor-in-chief took advantage of his position to privately compile his own articles into the textbooks.

Zheng complained that the editor-in-chief was too ugly to eat. The editor-in-chief who was criticized was Cao Wenxuan, who also asked Cao Wenxuan to show proof of tax payment from a few years ago. Cao Wenxuan himself is on the cusp of social concern.

He has been criticized and hotly debated by netizens for including inappropriate content in works recommended for children. Some netizens accused him of doing this on purpose, just for profit. With more and more comments and questions from netizens, he did not come forward to clarify and respond.

When you take the Chinese language test in the college entrance examination, can you be sure which part of your score will definitely get?

To be exact, except for the 6-point silent writing of ancient poems, you can't be sure that you can get a score for your composition. You can only know an approximate score. I just need to write according to my normal training thinking.

If I don't go off topic, it shouldn't be a problem to get at least 60 or 40 points. But these are all things you're not sure about. Only the dictation of ancient poems can be determined.

As long as you are sure that you have memorized the words correctly and written them correctly, you will get this point.

Wen Rumin, editor-in-chief of "Chinese Textbooks", explained the contraband issue of Chinese textbooks questioned by netizens recently through Weibo, and denied the problem. He believes that the selection of Chinese textbooks has been examined and screened at various levels, and every text has been approved for inclusion in primary and secondary school textbooks through the efforts of many people. It was agreed that some of the spirit of this article should be learned by primary and secondary school students, so it was agreed that this text should be included in primary and secondary school textbooks, which does not exist.

The editor-in-chief said that the reason why Douque included the author's works was because his grip on the pins was beautiful and the content was very inspirational, and it would only be decided after twenty or thirty rounds of review, and the final review would be made by the Ministry of Education, so there was no rumor from the outside world in Duanzhou.

The specific situation is that he said that he included ** because ** is very inspirational and the writing is very beautiful, and the books he made have been approved by the Ministry of Education.

He said that the editors-in-chief of these textbooks have been reviewed accordingly, but there are still some people who will use the ** of these textbooks to carry out illegal operations.

Wen Rumin said that the reason why Cao Wenxuan's "Luhua Shoes" was included was because it was very inspirational and beautiful, and it was decided after twenty or thirty rounds of review, and also said that the editor-in-chief and content of the Chinese textbook were approved by the Ministry of Education, not by the People's Education Society.

From the perspective of a bystander, we are concerned about the development of education in our country and the future of primary and secondary school students, so we are concerned about the issue of textbook compilation, but we also hope that the education sector is clear and free of impurities, and we hope that our worries will be superfluous.

The editor-in-chief of Chinese textbooks for primary and secondary schools has personally responded to external doubts, and not only the illustrations have room for improvement. Mathematics textbooks not only have room for improvement, but also room for improvement. For example, in a textbook, an editor-in-chief brings personal goods and stuffs his own articles into Chinese textbooks.

It's hard to see how buried it is. The compilation of textbooks should be done by experts with both ability and political integrity, which is related to the future events of the Guanqin nation. At the same time, before publication, the public consultation was carried out.

The inclusion of Cao Wenxuan's works is because the writing is very beautiful, and it was decided after twenty or thirty rounds of review, the result is approved by the Ministry of Education, and it is not a separate publishing house that can be decided.

What is the response of the editor-in-chief to the question that the texts of the Chinese textbooks contain private goods? In recent days, the illustration incident in the mathematics textbook of the people's education version has made a lot of noise, and since then there have been problems with the textbooks being picked up, and the Ministry of Education has also responded to this, saying that it will thoroughly investigate the problem textbooks in the primary and secondary school textbooks, and replace the new version, in the beginning of the school year in the fall of this year, primary school students will use the new version of the textbook. At the same time, the Chinese textbooks were also questioned, and netizens questioned that the texts of the Chinese textbooks contained private goods, to which the editor-in-chief Wen Rumin made the following response.

First, there is no problem of entrapment of smuggled goods in Chinese texts and teaching materials. Recently, Wen Rumin, editor-in-chief of Chinese textbooks, explained through Weibo that netizens have questioned the problem of Chinese textbooks with private goods in recent days, and denied the problem of Chinese textbooks with private goods, he believes that the selection of Chinese texts has gone through layers of review and screening, and each text has been approved by many people before agreeing to be compiled into primary and secondary school textbooks, and everyone agrees that some of the spirit in this article is worth learning and learning from primary and secondary school students. Only then will it be agreed that this text will be included in the textbooks of primary and secondary schools, and there is no phenomenon of Chinese textbooks carrying private goods. In the response, Professor Wen Rumin mentioned that Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article was selected into primary and secondary school textbooks because some of the spirit in Mr. Cao Wenxuan's article is worthy of learning by contemporary primary and secondary school students, not because Cao Wenxuan is the editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbook. Mr. Cao Hui Yingxuan's articles are included in the textbooks of primary and secondary school students, which have been screened and reviewed at various levels, and there is no phenomenon of entrainment of private goods.

Second, the selection and compilation of textbooks is related to teaching and educating people, so the public's criticism is understandable, but I hope the public can be objective. In recent days, problem textbooks have been frequently exposed, and the illustrations in the mathematics textbooks of the people's education version are difficult to describe, which makes many parents begin to worry that their children's three views will be polluted by these problem textbooks, so many parents begin to look for problems in other textbooks, so that the fire of the problem textbooks has been burned to the body of the Chinese textbooks, and the editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbooks or the editor-in-chief of the fascicle has private goods. Professor Wen Rumin believes that the selection and compilation of textbooks is a matter of prudence and education is a matter of prudence, and the public can put forward criticisms on the problem of textbooks, and they are happy to accept them, but they hope that the public can keep a clear mind and not add the fire of mathematics textbooks to the unreasonable Chinese textbooks.

To sum up, the above two points are the response of the editor-in-chief Wen Rumin, who is questioned about the inclusion of private goods in the texts of Chinese textbooks.

The response given so far is that all the works have been reviewed, but I think that such a hungry laughing reason is not convincing enough to touch the limbs, and if you do it wrong, you will do it wrong, and there is no need to make any excuses.

When the editor-in-chief received such suspicions, he said that middle school Chinese textbooks need to go through 20 or 30 review procedures before they can be finally published, so there is no such problem.

The editor-in-chief replied that the selection of texts for the textbook was checked at various levels, and it was only after twenty or thirty rounds of review that Wu Dabu could pass it, and it was not something that could be decided by one person.

The editor-in-chief of the textbook responded to the question of the difficulty of the language, and it should be said that the difficulty of the language has indeed risen slightly, but I feel that the difficulty rise is not as terrible as the one uploaded on the Internet, that is, there are a few more ancient poemsThe requirements for ancient poetry have been further improved, and it is estimated that they will be further improved in the future, and the improvement is for everyone, which you don't think is a big problem. <>

When you take the college entrance examination Chinese answers, can you be sure which part of your score will definitely get? To be exact, in addition to the 6 points of ancient poetry and writing, you are not sure that you can get that score composition, you can only know an approximate score, I just need to write according to my normal thinking, if I don't go off topic, at least 60 points, I should not be a problem to get 40 points. But these are all things that you are not sure of, only the dictation of ancient poetry is what you can be sure ofAs long as you are sure that you have memorized the right words and written correctly, then you can get this score.

Therefore, although the silent writing of ancient poetry and writing does not account for a large proportion of the score, the silent writing of ancient poetry is still a very important part, you must know that if you want to forcibly compare the silent writing of ancient poetry, it is the two multiple-choice questions in Chinese reading, but can you guarantee that the two multiple-choice questions can be correct? No, in terms of my own experience, the choice of language has the world, if you read the relevant multiple-choice questions, you can achieve more than 80% of the correct rate, but the score of about 110 in the language is not so difficult to understandBut if you can't even get 24 points out of nearly 30 points in reading multiple-choice questions, then it is too difficult for you to get 110 points. <>

Why does this sentence always emphasize this 110 points? It's because you want to take a book, or even say that you want to take a 221985, you have to get at least 110 in Chinese, otherwise the pressure on other subjects is too great, not that you can't get this score in Chinese, but that if you want to think about Chinese, you have to get 100 points, and you must have one of them in mathematics and English to reach 130, but 130 is so easy to testThere's a lot of uncertainty that you can get a higher score if you work hard.

Wen Rumin, the editor-in-chief of Keshu, responded, In terms of the content of ancient texts, the proportion of ancient poems and texts was only appropriately increased, but not by a large margin; Due to the increase in the coverage of content and the amount of reading in primary and secondary schools, everyone feels that the difficulty of primary and secondary school Chinese has increased, but the corresponding rote knowledge points have decreased.

It mainly shows that most people don't pay much attention to language nowadays, so making it more difficult in this area is also to make people pay more attention to it, and it is also a very good promotion in this process.

She replied that the ancient texts had indeed increased appropriately, but not substantially, and that they were now required to read widely, and that they were not memorizing as much as before.