The two sides of the contradiction can be transformed into each other, how are the Antarctic and the

Hehehehe, putting abstract philosophical principles on concrete things is not a good way to understand ......

How are the Antarctic and North Poles transformed?

If I "say" north and south is the opposite of your definition, then when you hear me say the South Pole and the North Pole, isn't it the other way around?

Or, you're standing on the South Pole, so that's the South over there? Under your feet? Is it South or North?

The concept of opposites is always produced in the case of comparison, so "contradiction" is "unity of opposites", that is, "opposites are born together", there is no life and no death, there is no length and no shortness, there is no south and no north, ......

The reference has changed, and the long may become short, and the short may become long.

First, you turn the earth upside down and look at the South Pole and the North Pole and it transforms.

Second, you put a ** square in front of your eyes, and place the long lines in the distance, and their properties are transformed.

There is no contradiction in matter itself, it is our perspective of observation that is transformed.

Think of it this way: a second is the same as a minute, a minute is the same as an hour, and thus a second is the same as a century.

Long is short, that's how I understand it.

Sometimes there are things that you can't figure out, and one day you suddenly figure it out.

Don't be in a hurry, the best will always come when you least expect it.

You stand at the North Pole and look up at the net, and according to the hypersphere theory, if you look good enough, you will see the South Pole.

Classmates

Read carefully.

The two sides of the contradiction can transform each other, but only under certain conditions.

Then the third condition is --- reference has changed.

The theory of relativity, ah, rises to philosophical pull,

Can only be converted. Cannot be converted.

Another one who reads dead books, absolutizing relative things!

Poor thing! You'd better read the book and take it seriously!

An abstract concept word that can only be used to describe your thinking. Just talking about being tall or short, without an object or condition, is a contradiction. Just talking about good or poor learning is a contradiction.

For example, if you want to add an object description, you can explain: a person is 1 year old, at 11 years old, at 21 years old, 11 years old is taller than 1 year old, and at 11 years old he is shorter than 21 years old, so at the age of 11, he can think of himself as an object, in the contradiction of being short and tall; If he knew that he was shorter at 11 than he was at 21, he switched between being tall and short. Conversion condition – time.

The premise, of course, is that your object has always existed and is normal and healthy. This class can also indicate whether you are a good learner or a poor learner. If, at this moment, the kind of person you are talking about who is shorter than me is taller than me, but I am short compared to someone taller than me, and I am good compared to someone who is poor in my studies, and I am poor compared to a good person, then it is not impossible to say that.

Transformation conditions – change the object of comparison.

Human thinking is limited. Personally, I think there is an antithesis to everything. A circle has and only one center, except for its center, including other points in the circle, all points on the circle are not the center of the circle, that is, not the center of the circle.

So I think the opposite of the single saying seems to be like this, like the English word formation with a prefix - un. In fact, there is already a presupposition implied in the above, that is, both sides of the contradiction can be converted into each other. How the north and south poles of the earth are transformed depends on your domain of knowledge, and perhaps Stephen Hawking or the living Albert Einstein can answer.

Is the past and present in time a contradiction with the future? I think that as a pair of contradictions, the future will become the past, and the past will become the future? I can't say this conversion clearly.

When you make comparisons, you have to define criteria. It's like the exam has to be expressed with test questions and scores, so that everyone has a common point of comparison. This standard is something you are used to.

The so-called success or failure, the so-called right and wrong, the standards of these things have been linked to society, morality, and law, and the formulation of these standards depends on the values formed by your personal cultivation. For example, if I use money as a criterion of right or wrong, or success or failure, then those fundraisers obviously do not meet my criterion, so they are wrong or unsuccessful in the criteria I define. I would never do that.

Personally, I know a lot, and I hope to help the landlord.

Qualitative change and quantitative change are the same thing, for example, the transformation between fat and thin is a process from quantitative change to qualitative change. Take your time and experience it yourself.

You have a problem with your understanding of the three laws of dialectics: the principle of quantitative change and qualitative change, the law of the unity of opposites, and the law of negation of negation. They are all about the same thing, not two things.

For example, human life and death are opposites for a person. Another example is that the bud is the negation of the flower, and this negation is precisely the negation of the negation itself, that is to say, the latter negation is the negation of the negation of the previous negation, which is precisely the affirmation of the flower. If the flower is not denied by the buds, but is denied by someone (such as breaking it off), then it can only be negated, and it cannot be called the negation of negation.

You're not just a question of philosophy, but also a question of language skills. The first is to swap concepts. This is a common problem when writing proposals.

The unity of opposites refers to the same thing, and in height and shortness, you regard self-height as the standard height, which is called the concept of reversal. The famous white horse is not a horse by the ancient sophists. The second is the ambiguity of the meaning of the concept.

The three-dimensionality of objects, in which the extensibility of time and the extensibility of space, should have been talked about by physics teachers, but it still contains the contradiction of finite and infinite. In fact, the so-called self-height standard is not accurate, are you only a meter tall and a tall person?! Therefore, if you learn philosophy well, if you strengthen your understanding of language and writing, you will have a lot less bizarre ideas.

Third, they do not have enough knowledge of natural sciences. When human beings have not yet fully understood and understood the universe, they have a different view when they have a different view, such as the view of time and space. The question of the transformation of the Earth's poles is not impossible, but we have not seen it for generations and cannot confirm it.

Okay, I'll say it from another angle, maybe it will help you a lot, of course, you can rely on your own opinions, and the opinions of other netizens are also very pertinent. When you are bored, strengthen the dabbling and training of language and other knowledge, and you will definitely be able to understand philosophical and theoretical issues. Have fun!

When you are learning about contradictions, it is normal to encounter these problems, and it is good to be able to think about so much! About contradictions, you remember, have universality. All things exist in contradiction, and without contradictions, nothing exists.

For example, we often say that "no one is perfect", if a person has advantages and no disadvantages, then this person must not be a person. If it is human, it is inseparable from contradictions. But yours is a bit of a brick and horn, and you should pay attention in the future, as long as you know that contradictions exist in all things, you don't have to deliberately look for what the contradictions of this thing are.

If you think too much, the problem will be complicated, and if you think simply, the problem will be solved.

Identity. and fighting are the two essential attributes of contradictions. They are interconnected and inseparable.

The identity or unity of contradiction refers to the contradictory façade of Shichang Wuyu.

interconnected and indivisible. There are two situations:

First, contradictory opposites are interconnected and interdependent, living in a unity.

Second, contradictory opposites penetrate and penetrate each other, and transform each other under certain conditions.

The fighting nature of contradiction refers to the mutually exclusive and antagonistic nature of the opposites of the contradictory search. This can take many forms.

The two sides of the contradiction are interdependent and mutually conditional, and they coexist in a unity. That is to say, the opposing sides of any contradiction cannot exist alone, but under certain conditions, each takes its own opposing aspect as the premise of its own existence, and if there is no other, it will not exist itself. "You can't live without me, I can't live without you.

For example, a magnet always has north and south poles, and these two poles are always inseparably linked, even if it is cut off and broken, it still exists at the same time as the north and south poles, and it is impossible to get a single magnetic pole with only the south pole and no north pole or only the north pole without the south pole. If the magnetism at one pole is eliminated, then the magnetism at the other pole will also disappear at the same time.

As the saying goes, "It's not that enemies don't get together." This speaks of the unity of contradictions.

It is precisely because they are enemies and opposites that they can come together and jointly maintain the existence of a unified whole. The forces and reactions in nature, the heredity and variation in biological evolution, the truth and error in understanding, and so on, are all manifestations of the identity of both sides of this contradiction.

(1) It is necessary to adhere to the contradiction analysis method of dividing into two, and adhere to the unity of the two-point theory and the key theory;

2) Adhere to the two-point theory, that is, when understanding complex things, we must see both the main contradiction and the secondary contradiction; When understanding a certain contradiction, it is necessary to see both the main and secondary aspects of the contradiction.

3) Adhere to the key theory, that is, when understanding complex things, we should focus on grasping the main contradictions; When understanding a certain contradiction, it is necessary to focus on grasping the main aspects of the contradiction and grasping the mainstream.

The two sides of the contradiction are interpenetrating and containing each other, and can transform each other under certain conditions. For example, "Misfortune and blessing are relied upon, and wealth and misfortune are lurking", misfortune is the premise of blessing, and blessing contains the factor of evil. That is to say, under certain conditions, good things and bad things can be transformed into each other.

Take your time and experience it.

The contradiction between option B and C is: struggle and identity. There are two forms of identity:

First, the two sides of the contradiction are interdependent under certain conditions, and the existence of one side and the existence of the other are premises, and the two sides are in a unity. Second, the two sides of the contradiction are transformed into each other according to certain conditions.

For example, under normal conditions, I meet people who ask me this question: I will ignore it.

But in I, for some inexplicable benefit, I should you.

Happiness gives birth to sorrow, and bitterness comes willingly.

A loss may turn out to be a gain; Woe and blessing rely on blessing and misfortune lurk; ......

We are required to base ourselves on reality, look forward to the future, pay attention to analyzing the various possibilities for the development of things, and create conditions to turn favorable possibilities into reality, so as to achieve success in practical activities. First, the possibility is contained in reality, so we must base the ideal on reality. When we look forward to the future, we must attach importance to the present, and we must face the reality when we set up ideals.

Every contemporary young person should have ideals, and with ideals, they will have lofty goals in life, their inner world will be fulfilling, and their actions will have a strong driving force. However, in order for an ideal to become a reality, it must be based on reality, otherwise it can only be a utopian dream. In order to turn ideals into reality, we must proceed from the current reality, and the so-called "eyes to the mountains, down-to-earth" means this.

Face the reality but not be willing to be realistic, and start from the reality to transform the reality. Second, there are certain conditions for the possible transformation into reality. Therefore, it is only by giving full play to our agency that we can create conditions conducive to the translation of what is possible into reality.

Third, the unity of possibility and reality also gives full play to people's subjective initiative. Possibility and reality are a pair of categories that reflect the interrelationship of things in the past, present, and future. Actuality refers to the existence that has been generated, has an internal basis, and is inevitable.

Possibility refers to the potential in the development process of things, and is the various trends contained in things and predicting the future of their development.

To grasp the category of possibility, it is necessary to distinguish between several different situations: to distinguish between possibility and impossibility. It is necessary to distinguish between the possibility of reality and the possibility of abstraction.

The possibility of reality is the possibility that there is a relatively sufficient basis in reality and can be realized at this stage; An abstract possibility is a possibility that lacks sufficient basis and conditions in reality and can therefore be realized in the future. To distinguish between two opposing possibilities, we should think about the worst possible and strive to make things the best possible way. It is necessary to distinguish between different degrees of possibility.

It is also necessary to pay attention to the difference in quantity, distinguish the degree of possibility, and strive to increase the possibility of being advantageous and reducing and avoiding the possibility of harm.

Possibility and reality are opposites. On the one hand, the possibility and the reality are different. It may not be reality, reality is not possible, and the two cannot be equated. On the other hand, possibility and reality are interdependent and interdependent, and can be transformed into each other under certain conditions.