India followed China s example and built a 10 storey building in 2 days, and how did it end up?

China has long been known as the "infrastructure madman", and many buildings in various cities in China have become local landmarks. For the title of "infrastructure madness". India has been coveting it for a long time and has always wanted to find an opportunity to surpass China.

At that time, Changsha, China, set a new infrastructure record, with the 57-storey building in Changsha taking only 19 days to complete, and the building was specially made to be earthquake-resistant, and was said to be able to withstand a magnitude 9**. This achievement has also been praised by architects from all over the world, while India has challenged China. India says it wants to surpass China's building and win the title of "infrastructure madman".

This is not the first time that India has said such a thing, and since the slogan of "surpassing China" is shouted as loud as it falls, since it has launched a challenge, China can only wait and see. India seems to have made up their minds this time, and they built a 10-story building in two days. Everyone thinks that India has won this time, after all, it has only been two days to achieve such an extent, and there are still two brushes.

However, while all Indian nationals were basking in the victory yet to come, the building collapsed, adding to India's massive rollover scene. The reason for the collapse of the building is also shocking, India did not lay the foundation when it built the building. As we all know, the most important thing in building a house is to lay a good foundation, otherwise it is easy to collapse.

That's it? It would be a bit naïve for India to win the title of "infrastructure madman".

In addition, the reason why film and television can be built so quickly is because this building is not actually built of reinforced concrete, and the whole is made of some steel frames, so the stability is not strong, not to mention the shockproof function.

So, do you have anything to say about the results of India's model China's rapid construction? It is believed that in the process of comparison, India should pay attention to the quality problem, otherwise it will lose face and money, and it will not lose its wife and soldiers.

Later, it was not built very well, and the ten-storey building was not built in two days, because there is no such civil engineering technology in India, so in the end the building took much longer than two days.

In the end, they didn't build it either, because their technology was too slow, and the level of strength in all aspects was not enough.

Finally collapsed. Because it does not have advanced machines as a guarantee, nor does it have a strong economic strength to back it up.

India, which also has a large population, is faced with countless high-rise buildings in our country, why are they indifferent and do not build high-rise buildings like our country? Do you know why?

We all know that China and India are both populous countries, so they are always compared. In our country, in order to alleviate the pressure on housing, we will build all kinds of high-rise buildings for people to live in. In neighboring India, with a population of more than 1.3 billion, they don't build high-rise buildings like we doThe difference between the two depends on the land issue.

Although we have two-thirds more land than they do, our land is either high mountains or basins, and the land is not as flat as in India, and because of this, the arable land and the area of houses that can be built are not as good as in India.

In other words, although China's land is relatively vast, but the terrain is relatively complex, and our current agricultural development is not the first place, rural development is relatively slow, many people go to the city, in order to alleviate the problem of large urban population and little housing, so China has built a large number of high-rise buildings.

India, on the other hand, has a large population on their land, but it is enough for them, even if 1.3 billion people build a house each, there is enough land space.

The different economic developments between the two countries,If you want to build a tall building, you need a lot of money in addition to having the technology to build it. Funding is more difficult for India now. If they have to spend 7 times the money to build a high-rise building when they have enough to live, Indians will still choose affordable bungalows to build, and feel that the construction of high-rise buildings is unnecessary.

Another reason is that Indians' land is privatized, and basically no one wants to sell their land. Therefore, the above reasons are enough for a long time: India rarely builds high-rise buildings, and despite such a large population, it is still willing to live in bungalows.

The main reason is that India does not have enough productivity, and the employment rate is very low, and the facilities are relatively backward now, and the gap between the rich and the poor in India is very large, and the religious atmosphere in India is very strong, and the faith is to be content with the status quo and obey the dispatch of God.

This question is related to the construction of the country, the economy and the humanities and culture, although India has a large population, but the economic development is not as good as ours, and the Indians have a heavier belief and prefer retro style.

Because India's economy is not developed enough, and the land area is very large, there is no need to build high-rise buildings, so it does not build high-rise buildings like our country.

India is planning to build the world's tallest building, but India does not support it in many ways. **: Currently, the global fanatical pursuit of skyscrapers has reached the point of incorrigibility.

Some countries in Asia are building high-rise buildings, so that 7 of the world's top 10 skyscrapers are located in Asia. India, unwilling to be lonely, is now joining the ranks of building skyscrapers.

According to reports, there are strict limits on the height of skyscrapers under domestic law, but this has not been an obstacle to the construction of skyscrapers in India. In an interview, Dio Datta, chairman of the Development Committee of the Noida Industrial Development Zone, which is located on the outskirts of Delhi, said: "We are going to change the law to make this construction project work, and we have reached a high degree of agreement with Congress on the matter of changing the law."

Datta also said that 140 hectares of land will be granted for the construction of the super skyscraper in the Noida Industrial Development Zone. Although the land is still grazing, it won't be long before construction workers begin construction.

The budget is up to £5 billion.

Datta revealed that the world's tallest skyscraper has a budget of up to £5 billion to build. When completed, the skyscraper will attract thousands of tourists and businessmen. Whether you're here for sightseeing, shopping, leisure, or business, people can find what they're looking for here.

However, some people are worried about the huge investment of 5 billion pounds, because such a huge investment cannot rely only on India** and private funds, but requires the intervention of foreign consortiums, but for the Noida Industrial Development Zone, it is still doubtful whether it can attract the favor of foreign consortiums.

Ten years ago, Delhi's Noida Industrial Development was little more than a ranch on the outskirts of Delhi, but today it is a processing and manufacturing hub, and India** wants to build it into a new tourist hub.

India does not have the capacity to supply electricity and water.

The Noida Industrial Development Zone is very well connected to Delhi with an 8-lane expressway connecting the two places. In addition, India** plans to build a rapid metro between the two places.

However, some indigenous architects in India have raised objections to the project. Opponents argue that spending huge sums of money to build a skyscraper is a blind imitation of other countries and disregard for their own realities.

India's most respected indigenous architect, Balkrishna Dush, said: "This is not in line with the reality of India, we do not have the capacity to provide water and electricity to the 710-metre altitude. Such a skyscraper would definitely need its own independent power supply system in order to ensure that the elevator would not stop running in the middle of operation due to lack of power.

In this regard, India is not yet sure and confident. ”