Help me analyze the Sony W170 and Olympus 1040. I decided not to come down

It is too ignorant to say that Olympus does not need to think about it, Olympus is a veteran optical company, and Canon, Nikon, Minolta, Binder are the top 5 camera manufacturers in Japan, and now Minolta is not good, and was acquired by Sony, so Sony can make SLR, otherwise with Sony's own technical strength, how can it make SLR so quickly?

Of course, I don't say this to say that Sony is bad, but I want to show that Olympus is not bad either. As far as my own use is concerned, second-tier brands like Fujifilm and Olympus will generally be more brilliant in color performance than first-tier brands such as Nikon Canon.

Let's talk about these two machines,W series is a cost-effective practical model in the Sony camp,U series is a fashionable model in the Olympus brand,It also comes with some advanced functions of waterproof and anti-fall,If ** is about the same,Oba is more recommended。

No need to compare, choose Sony W170, this machine is pretty good, and the performance is good in all aspects.

Olympus, this brand, I don't think about it.

I just want Canon Sony.

Upstairs can't just say a word about Olympus! After all, people are professional cameras! Once upon a time, when there was no canon, people were also the boss!

Of course, if you want me to say that you still choose Sony! W170 is good! I'm not going to copy anything for you!

See for yourself.

At that time, I wanted to buy a Sony too! But if you don't have that much money, you can buy an Oba one, but it's not bad! Card machines, all the same!

..In fact, it's pretty much the same, Sony's things have always been focused on good looks, and the quality is very average. The Olympus 1040 is also very good value for money, you see you like it, it's really about the same.

I can tell you for sure that W170 is relatively cost-effective in all aspects It can be said to be an entry-level guess teasing luxury fingerchain version of 170 I looked at the market yesterday** is much more expensive than the online ** has fallen to the spike stove broke 2q.

I've heard from friends that the Olympus machine is very good, and I like the Olympus machine a lot

This estimate is enough to choke, just like the battery of a mobile phone, it is strange, even if it is the same fierce brand, sometimes it can't be used, not to mention different brands

Buying a card machine must pay attention to appearance and portability.

In terms of the parameters of both cameras. Naturally, Sony's W170 is more dominant.

** Upper Sony is quite more expensive than Olympus. So, if you don't have that much budget, Olympus is also more than enough for your family.

If budget isn't that important, you're more performance-oriented. Sony's W170 is naturally much more powerful than Olympus.

In addition, the XD card used by Olympus is relatively rare, and although the memory stick used by Sony is also rare, all of Sony's own products use memory sticks, which also provides convenience for the use of other products in the future.

Olympus cameras are good value for money, and Canon and Sony are slightly lower.

Of the three brands, Olympus has the longest time, followed by Canon, and Sony is a rising star.

Buy Sony's W170, after all, it's a big brand.

If you are financially rich, buy a w170.

In the overall comparison is definitely the W170's performance is better than the 1010!

It's just that the W170 is more expensive than the 1010.

This is to see what kind of price you want to buy in your budget.

I feel that the quality of Sony is better, but overall it is also a bit more expensive.

1800 can win w170, I also want to buy this machine, 28mm wide angle, 5 times light change. Refreshing! ~

Wide angles are important, and remember: the best zoom is to step forward. Zoom is all about losing image quality.

The CCD anti-shake of the home machine of Olin Gao liquid destruction Baqi Bei Buried Wangs has not been applied for a long time, and the effect is very average, and there is a gap between the effect and the mature IS ratio of Canon.

Olympus cameras are quite well-known and were popular in the film era.

Scenes are convenient, but not too many are not a bad thing, and many scenes are basically the same.

The CCD size at this price point is not a big problem.

The picture quality is top-notch, Canon ixus860is

Those who buy Canon generally fancy the soft color, those who buy Nikon generally fancy the sharp color, those who buy Binder generally fancy the noble background, those who buy the Olympus generally fancy the appearance, those who buy Ricoh generally fancy the old optics, those who buy Laika are generally very rich, those who buy Kodak are generally anti-Japanese, those who buy Fuji are generally blind to the parameters, those who buy Sony are generally fooled by advertising, those who buy Panasonic are generally ignorant, and those who buy Casio are generally extremely ignorant. Patriots are generally supportive of domestic products, Shixian.

Those who buy BenQ are generally in the water with a sail hood in their brains.

Buying a Samsung is non-mainstream Hahan's.