What is the benefit of the pre sale system for home buyers? Experts say the cancellation of the pre

In my opinion, the pre-sale system is disadvantageous for home buyers. The reason why experts say that the abolition of the pre-sale system is not good for home buyers is because experts consider the supply of houses. From the perspective of the supply of houses, if the pre-sale system is abolished, then some developers will develop commercial housing due to lack of funds, so the entire house construction process will be much longer than before, and even within a few years can not be officially delivered.

Because many developers now get the money in advance through the pre-sale system in the process of building houses, and then start building houses. If the pre-sale system is abolished, then these developers will have to prepare enough money to build their own houses, so that they can complete the houses smoothly. Therefore, from the perspective of the supply of houses, the abolition of the pre-sale system will make the commercial housing on the market become less, and the ** may also increase accordingly.

But on the whole, I personally think that the pre-sale system is actually disadvantageous for home buyers. Because you will find that most of the problems of buying unfinished buildings are these pre-sale houses, and the pre-sale system is actually more unfriendly to consumers. Before the house is officially built, the consumer has already signed the house contract, paid the down payment, and signed a mortgage loan with the bank.

This shows that although the consumer has not officially moved into the house, he has already paid for the house, and in this process, the consumer lacks a strong guarantee. <>

As a result, there will be consumers who pay their monthly payments on time, but the developer runs away with the money, resulting in the house becoming unfinished. All the money invested by consumers has been wasted, and rights protection has become a difficulty. Therefore, from the perspective of consumers' personal interests, I personally think that the pre-sale system is actually very unfriendly to home buyers.

Because the consumer pays the money without any guarantees.

The pre-sale system is not good for home buyers. The spot system can reduce the risk of unfinished houses.

The system of pre-sale of commercial housing and sales based on floor area has its historical background, but it is undeniable that it generally violates the rules of market transactions and is obviously unfair to buyers. It is proposed to cancel the pre-sale system of commercial housing. However, experts said that if the pre-sale system is canceled, the financial pressure on real estate companies will be greater, and the housing prices will be further improved, which is more unfavorable to buyers.

Hello, in fact, the cancellation of pre-sales does not take advantage of buyers. After the cancellation of the pre-purchase, the developer needs a large amount of funds for the development of the real estate, and the corresponding housing cost will increase, so the buyer needs to face the price of the house again.

The cancellation of the pre-sale is a real guarantee that the buyer can get his or her own home, and at the same time, it can also supervise the construction behavior of the real estate developer.

For us ordinary home buyers, because of our own limited level of legal knowledge, many people do not know how to protect their basic rights and interests. When buying a house, if the bank and the developer can use the funds in the escrow account without authorization, there is no way to ensure that the construction of the property can be completed normally. In this situation, it is no wonder that more and more people are calling for the abolition of the pre-sale system, which is also a sales method that harms the basic rights and interests of home buyers.

Experts who advise not to abolish the pre-sale system are themselves ill-intentioned.

You can try to understand that for some real estate experts and economists, because their position itself is not on different people, they exist to protect real estate developers and other vested interests, so they will suggest that the pre-sale system cannot be abolished. For these experts, they simply do not think about the sale of the pre-sale system from the perspective of home buyers. <>

The abolition of the pre-sale system can protect the basic rights and interests of home buyers.

If the pre-sale system can be abolished, when buyers buy a house, buyers do not need to worry about their houses becoming unfinished buildings at all, because buyers can fully see the houses they will live in. At the same time, buyers can also monitor the construction quality of their homes in real time, and when they are not satisfied with the construction quality of their houses, buyers can choose to choose other properties. For home buyers, no home buyer would support the continued existence of the so-called pre-sale system.

From my personal point of view, the complete abolition of the pre-sale system is basically expected. If we want the real estate industry to develop healthily, the pre-sale sales method should be abolished as soon as possible, and in this way, we need to actively protect the basic interests of home buyers, and we also need to implement and monitor the various use of funds by real estate developers.

The first point is that the pre-sale system cannot be canceled, the main reason is that after the cancellation, then there will definitely be a lot of problems, and the second point is that the biggest advantage is that the house can be sold in advance, and there will be no backlog of houses.

Many experts feel that once such a system is abolished, it will lead to problems in the purchase of real estate, and it will also lead to greater pressure on the operation of houses. The advantage is to be able to choose a house that is more suitable for you, and you can reduce your financial pressure, be able to buy a house better, and also promote the sale of a house and promote the purchase of a house.

This is because experts believe that the pre-sale system can be linked to the vacancy rate of the house, but if it is canceled, buyers can largely avoid buying unfinished properties.

Buying a house is a particularly important thing in many families, and it can be said that many families have exhausted their family funds in order to buy a house, and they have done their best. Everyone wants the house they buy to be good value for money and low. Nowadays, buying a house is basically a pre-sale system, and there are few existing houses to buy.

So what do you think about real estate experts saying that the pre-sale system has positive significance? Do you think the pre-sale system should be abolished? I think what real estate experts say is very reasonable, the pre-sale system should not be abolished, but only gradually improved, so that the real estate and the homeowner can achieve a balance, so that both parties can protect each other's basic interests.

Pre-sale buying is a very common problem in today's society, and it may take several years for people to buy a house before they can hand over the house before they can have a house that truly belongs to them. However, many people find that the house built by the real estate agent does not meet their expectations, or it is directly unfinished. And this will seriously damage the interests of home buyers, and many people say that this is because of the pre-sale system of real estate.

The real estate developer took the money from the buyer, but did not hand over a house that the buyer would agree with. As a result, many people began to call for the abolition of the pre-sale system and the adoption of existing houses for sale.

Some real estate experts say that the pre-sale system has positive significance, because the pre-sale system can allow real estate developers to understand the sales status of the property in a timely manner, and if the sales of the house type is not good, then the house type and structure can be changed in time, so that the use of real estate resources can be maximized. And the implementation of the pre-sale system, can also allow people to buy their own houses in advance, housing prices change every year, and then buy when the house is built, ** may be a lot different, many people could have been able to afford a house, but with the increase of time can not afford to buy a house.

Personally, I think that there is some truth in what real estate experts say, and the real estate pre-sale system cannot be canceled, but can only be improved. This requires relevant policies and relevant departments to adjust and improve in a timely manner to ensure the rights and interests of home buyers as much as possible. After the implementation of the pre-sale system, real estate developers should also try their best to build houses that satisfy buyers.

The pre-sale can be canceled, because the real estate has not been licensed or the construction has not started, and the pre-sale is a deception to consumers.

I think these experts have been able to come up with a lot of experience, and I think the pre-sale system should be abolished, because it will increase the frequency of unfinished properties by 25%.

Every day, I say that no one buys the house, it can't be sold, and it would be good if we didn't continue to build it. The pre-sale system is wrong.

I think the pre-sale system should be abolished.

You can't buy and sell land to run a business, monopolize the land market, and it's a taboo to do business! **As soon as the price of land drops, real estate is just an ordinary daily necessities like winter melon! Taxes should be used to increase income, not to run a business!

Otherwise, the people won't know what your last name is.

I don't have to make such a suggestion, I think such a suggestion is purely bad, and a normal expert should not say such a thing.

For those experts who have suggested that the pre-sale system should not be abolished, I don't know if these experts have bought their own houses, let alone whether they have bought unfinished properties. To some extent, the pre-sale system itself means that owners simply have no way to defend their basic rights. In the process of buying a house, the funds in the custody account of the relevant real estate can be misappropriated at will, which means that there will always be a real estate that becomes the last unfinished building.

For real estate developers, they will use this method to amplify their capital volume. But for the average home buyer, the pre-sale system is a sales method that completely undermines the basic rights and interests of the buyer, and the buyer has no way to see the construction quality of his house at all, so it is difficult for me to understand why these experts will resolutely defend the pre-sale system. <>

There is no such thing as a positive pre-sale system.

Some real estate experts say that the pre-sale system is positive, because he believes that the pre-sale system allows real estate developers to get more access to the capital, and at the same time, it can also develop the real estate industry in this way. There is really no problem with this logic, but we must know that the scale of development of our real estate industry is already very large, and even the debt scale of many developers, including Evergrande, has reached the level of 100 billion and trillion yuan, I don't know if this is the positive significance of the pre-sale system mentioned by experts. <>

The pre-sale system should be abolished altogether.

For the majority of home buyers, almost all buyers are very supportive of the sales method of existing houses for sale, and everyone also hates the sales method of the pre-sale system. For an average home buyer, buying a house basically means the biggest thing for a person or even a family. If their house becomes unfinished, buyers will not even have the means to defend their rights, so the existence of the pre-sale system is simply ridiculous.

In general, some experts do not look at the problem of various measures from the perspective of ordinary home buyers, and these experts obviously belong to standing and talking without backache.

Not recognized, because the current situation is that the pre-sale system has led to a lack of confidence in real estate companies and become distrustful.

I agree that this may change the role of the real estate and the owner, in fact, you can choose to set the delivery period as the loan time.

I don't agree with it, I think the pre-sale system is completely unnecessary and a waste of resources.

The existence of pre-sale must have a part of the reasonable significance, the cancellation of the pre-sale system, the production capacity of the production developer will decline, the relationship between supply and demand will also change, and in the long run, there will be a change.

This is unreasonable, it will bring the risk of unfinished properties to many buyers, and it is unfair.

I don't think it's reasonable, because if you want to buy a house, you have to borrow money first, and if it's an unfinished house, you have to repay the mortgage of the house, which is very infuriating.

The significance of the pre-sale system can reduce the pressure on the builders and help them alleviate the problem of financial constraints in their hands. If the pre-sale system is canceled, it will lead to a big problem in the capital chain of the real estate business, and the corresponding property cannot be provided accordingly, and the supply will exceed demand in the short term, resulting in an increase in housing prices. <>

In the long run, the pre-sale system can indeed be slowly abolished, and what needs to be done now is to strengthen the supervision of off-plan sales, and set up corresponding supervision accounts in banks, and at the same time, the housing and construction department should set up a corresponding third-party custodian, these steps can rely on the establishment of ** as a third-party institution. At the same time, we also need to ensure that the developer is paid in installments according to the progress of the project, so that the construction period will not be delayed. In order to make the negative impact of the pre-sale system, such as the disappearance of unfinished buildings, we need to deal with it slowly in the long run, and we cannot cancel the pre-sale system all at once.

We can start by selecting some places to pilot. In fact, in Shijiazhuang, Qinghai, Tianjin and other places have already begun to implement the relevant local supervision system. Xi'an and other cities have fired the first shot of the pre-sale system fund supervision in advance.

Promote the fund supervision account of the entire pre-sale system, which is transparent to the public, and at the same time, it is also necessary to make the entire pre-sale funds not only subject to supervision, but also to be supervised by the public. When the pre-sale system was just emerging in China's commercial housing, it greatly promoted the landing of China's commercial housing funds and its development speed, but it also contributed to the problems in the later stage when it was not implemented properly.

Since the current real estate has entered a state of low growth and relatively sluggish, its disadvantages have been exposed. Once the developer's funds are broken, it is the common people who suffer. We must always understand that the pre-sale system does not mean that the house can not be delivered, in fact, it is still the responsibility of unfavorable supervision and the real estate itself, and it cannot all be attributed to the pre-sale system, the pre-sale funds should all supervise the progress of the third-party account, if it is to be used in accordance with the entire regulations, and it is not misappropriated, then it is difficult to exist such as unfinished buildings.