However, the things in the world are known as one and do not know the number of the two, and it is r

Expression: Argumentative.

It means "If this is the case, then there are many people who only know the superficial phenomena and do not know the fundamental morality in the affairs of the world, and can they be subjectively inferred based on common sense?" It shows that nothing can be inferred from subjectivity, and true knowledge can be achieved through practice.

Summarize the full text and deepen the center.

The meaning of this sentence is that since this is the case, there are many cases in which the world only knows the superficial phenomena and does not know the fundamental truth, so can it be subjectively judged based on a certain truth?

Source: Qing Jiyun's "Stone Beasts in the River": "As he said, the fruit is several miles away." However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason? ”

Translation: According to his words, the stone beast was found a few miles away. Since this is the case, there are many cases in which the world only knows the superficial phenomena and does not know the fundamental truth, so can it be subjectively judged based on a certain truth?

Appreciation of "Stone Beasts in the River".

The end of the article "The Stone Beast in the River" reveals the main idea, like the lecturer and Taoist, "but know one but do not know the other" There are many cases, which are common in daily life.

Although the Stone Beast in the River is short, the structure is quite rigorous. The words of the monks, the words of the lecturers, and especially the words of the old river soldiers, are as deep as a layer, like peeling bamboo shoots, which is very convincing. The language of the article is also concise and accurate, and there is an irrefutable force.

In this case, there are too many situations in which we only understand one thing and do not understand the second thing, so how can we judge subjectively based on a certain truth?

In this case, there are too many cases in the world where things in the world only know the superficial phenomena but do not know the fundamental truth, can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

In this case, there are many people who only know one thing and don't know the other about the things in the world, can they make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

Do you really know the story of the stone beast in the river?

In this case, there are many things in the world that only know the superficial phenomena and do not know the root causes, so can we make subjective judgments based on reason?

In this case, there are too many people who only know one aspect of the situation and do not know the other situation, so how can they make a subjective judgment based on a certain truth?

In this case, there are many people who only know one aspect of the world's affairs, and do not know the others, so can they make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

But there are too many people (things) who only know one aspect of the matter and don't know other aspects, so how can they judge arbitrarily based on one-sided theories alone? ?

Since this is the case, there are too many people who only know one of the things in the world and don't know the other, so how can they make subjective judgments based on one of the truths?

If you discuss the affairs of the world, you can decide whether there is or is not according to reason, you can, seek truth from facts, unite the majority, have principles, pay attention to the content and way of words, treat people with sincerity, and treat people equally.

Anyone who sits at home and discusses the affairs of the world is.

However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason? Translation of ".

Since this is the case, there are many cases in which the world only knows the superficial phenomena and does not know the fundamental truth, so can it be subjectively judged based on a certain truth?

However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason? "From the Qing Dynasty author Ji Yun's "Stone Beasts in the River".

This article tells a very educational fable, expressing the author's ridicule of the self-righteous people like scholars, and also telling the characters that understanding things requires a comprehensive and in-depth investigation**.

There are many people who only know the surface of the affairs of the world and do not know their deep meaning, so can they be judged according to the viewpoint of one side?

There are too many cases in the world where we only know one aspect of things and do not know the other side of it, and can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

There are many situations in which we only know a part of the things in the world, but we do not understand the whole thing, can we infer and speculate according to reason?

Since this is the case, there are too many situations in which we only understand one of the things in the world and do not understand the second, so how can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

In this case, there are too many situations in which we only understand one of the things in the world and do not understand the other, so can we make subjective judgments based on one truth? 欤: (yu second voice) indicates a question [must be translated, otherwise points will be deducted].

There are many situations in which we only understand a part of the things in the world, but we do not understand the whole thing, so we can infer it according to reason.

In this case, there are too many cases in the world where we only know the superficial phenomena and do not know the fundamental truth, (how can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?) (Absolutely!) On the workbook!! ）

Since there are many things in the world that only know the superficial phenomena and do not know their essence, can they be inferred based on common sense?

However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason? From.

Ji Yun's "Notes on Reading Wei Caotang" can be concluded as: However, there are things in the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know that there are many of the two, and you can make assumptions based on reason.

Then there are too many situations in the world where you only know one thing and don't understand the other.

You can't make a subjective judgment based on a certain reason.