Debate Materials Debate Questions Whether you should read literary masterpieces

Theoretically, experience is necessary in life, and experience is divided into direct and indirect experience. Direct experience is experienced by oneself, while indirect experience is mostly experienced by reading or listening to others. How can you live without indirect experience?

Rhetorically ask your opponent, what should you read if you don't read literary masterpieces? Do you want everyone to read the Theory of Relativity together? If someone dares to say Tang poems and Song lyrics, you continue to ask, how many Tang poems and Song lyrics can you memorize?

And what does it mean that there are so many people in the world who are together and have been nurtured by the world's literary masterpieces? Everyone is familiar with these famous books even if they don't read them, which shows something. There is a theory called existence is reasonable.

Rhetorically ask your opponent, what is the most important part of human spiritual life? Tell him that Marxism tells us that ideals and beliefs come from? In addition to practice, there is only reading. What to read? Back to the previous question.

Okay, play well, this debate is on your side, and if nothing happens (no shady), the judges should be leaning.

Absolutely!

If you don't read literary masterpieces, how can you really know the essence of the language?

Moreover, reading literary masterpieces is a recognition and understanding of language.

I've thought about it so much for the time being. Hope that helps.

There are many benefits of reading literary masterpieces, in a big way, it is to cultivate temperament and broaden knowledge, and to put it in detail, literary masterpieces are generally classics and circulated, then, they generally reflect the background of an era, culture, characters, domestic and foreign, and then, the process of reading is actually a process of imitation You can also learn writing skills, irony, flashbacks, etc., and then, if you look at the English version, you should also learn a foreign language, the worst, you can also look at it as a pastime, Kill the time.

There are benefits to reading, but if you don't read it, you don't know what literature is good.

Literary works on the subject of debate:

1.Gu Sen: "The Joy of Thinking - Mathematical Notes" - Playing debate competitions and writing math problems is not only a kind of relaxation, but also a kind of communication.

2.Dallaire Huff: "The Statistical Trap", also known as "Statistics Can Lie", you have to learn to ask the other side the five questions, which five questions, see for yourself.

3.Chai Jing: "Seeing" - Debate requires logic, but it also requires experience. What should I do if I don't have enough experience, and use other people's experience to make up for it. Chai Jing is a somewhat contradictory but very emotional person, so this book can also help you understand what understanding is.

4.Saber: The Strange Case of the Cave – a great book for debate, especially if you're interested in jurisprudence.

5.Ordinary Logic Writing Group: "Ordinary Logic (Fifth Edition)" - If you are often complained by seniors about the confusion of logic, you might as well try this book, and after reading it, it can help you transform into a logic monster in the eyes of others.

6.Sandel: "Justice - How to Do It" - Moral philosophy is a field that many debates cannot get rid of, if you think Aristotle is too far away to read, Kant is too obscure to read, Rawls is too heavy to read, then read this book.

It is a competition of thinking reflection ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability. The function of debate is to draw a clear line between right and wrong, to explore the criteria for controlling chaos in the world, to judge the basis for the similarity and difference of things, to weigh the pros and cons, and to resolve the doubts that exist in people's minds. Debate can enable people to debate right from wrong, adhere to the truth, exercise their thinking ability, increase their wisdom, enhance their understanding between people, and promote mutual communication.

The campus debate competition is an important activity to enliven the campus cultural atmosphere, enrich students' extracurricular life, enhance students' ability to distinguish between right and wrong, logical thinking ability and language expression ability, improve students' debate level, discover and cultivate school debate talents, and reflect the mental state of young students. The author talks about the topic of "giving full play to the moral education function of the debate competition and constructing high-quality campus moral education activities" from the aspects of the role and precautions of the campus debate competition and how to carry out the debate competition. 1. The role of the campus debate competition 1. The campus debate competition is conducive to the improvement of the ability of the contestants

The debate competition is an all-round examination of the ability and level of debaters. In the process of debate, if the debaters want to conquer and defeat their opponents in the fierce confrontational debate, the knowledge and ability they need to possess are multifaceted, and for this purpose, they fully demonstrate themselves on the stage, and their abilities are also unconsciously improved. First of all, thinking skills are improved.

If you don't have a real insight into things, you can't have amazing punchlines. If there is no thought, it is impossible to speak like a river. The profundity, argumentation, and agility of thinking have all been improved.

At the beginning, there was nothing.

Debate competitions on campus, especially those organized by colleges and universities, are generally places with high standards and can train talents. The debate competition is usually a team of 4 people, divided into 1 debate responsible for the idea, 2 debate responsible for the statement, 3 debate responsible for the main attack, 4 debate responsible for summarizing, 4 people cooperate with each other, not for supplementation.

By participating in the debate competition, the collaboration between the team members can be greatly improved, the thinking ability can be greatly improved, and the eloquence and reaction will be greatly improved.

Argument 1: The reason why classic masterpieces have become classics is because of their tenacious vitality, the significance of inheritance, the meaning of human existence, and the benefit of human beings.

Argument 2: Studying the classics is of great help to our students' abilities, first of all, the most important thing is to know and understand the society and the world, and second, to improve their own writing ability. Popular literature, most of the content and text are plain and straightforward, and there is nothing to learn.

It's just a pastime and a recreational read.

So much to think about, I wish you success in your debate!

The classic masterpieces have a great influence, and the market for popular literature is vast, but most of them can't leave a deep impression after reading them.

Literature. In general terms, it is to give people to face the world of the author's pen, this world is very real, and at the same time it reflects a very philosophical reflection, so it is more difficult to read. It takes a lot of knowledge to build.

If it is popular literature, popular literature gives people an illusion. It's just that people will forget about it after being happy for a while, as long as you compare a popular ** with the plot of Journey to the West. That must be a lot of people who remember Journey to the West, after all, they were nurtured enough when they were young.

But there is some truth to the fact that popular culture is known as fast food literature. There are many people in China who have never read a book, and they can only live by reading such books.

Despise replicators. 】