Entangled in Mazda CX4 and VV7, seeking education

Updated on Car 2024-08-12
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    Nonsense, the engine VV7 can't be compared, not a grade, VV7 gearbox dual-clutch, although it is wet, but it is estimated that you can pay for it after 3 years of warranty, you don't understand it yourself, you can see it, fuel consumption is also high, and meat, and Mazda's power is excessive, that is to say, you can imagine buying VV7 to drive for 10 years, the money spent is definitely more than the 18W more CX4, the chassis is not to say, both cars on the Internet have chassis disassembly, to put it mildly, the summary is that VV7 is to sell shells, but really, I like the appearance very much, but in the end I still chose the 2018 low-profile four-wheel drive, because the car is not used to see and be angry, it is to be enjoyed, not a car black.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    The Mazda CX4 is more recommended, this model is more fashionable and sporty, and the SKYACTIV technology has low fuel consumption and advanced and reliable technology.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    It is recommended to choose Mazda CX4, the engine technology is more mature, and the fuel consumption is a little lower. The chassis is well tuned and comfortable.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    It is recommended that Mazda, SKYACTIV technology, the world's leading, low fuel consumption, good power, and less cost in the later stage.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The Mazda CX4 is better in terms of quality control and quality, more driving pleasure, and a better driving experience.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It is recommended to take a look at the Mazda CX-4, the engine of SKYACTIV, the performance is very good, and it also retains its value more than the Great Wall car.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    It is recommended to take a look at the Mazda CX-4, a joint venture model, and a coupe-type SUV, which has a very stylish appearance and excellent performance.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    WEY needs time and practice to prove that the CX4 is not bad overall, but the rear space is a little smaller.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Not long ago <>, Wu Yu (pseudonym), who lives in Jiangxi, revealed to us that he spent 190,000 yuan to buy a car, which is this red Great Wall Weipai VV7C, the front shape is really good-looking, more cool than the joint venture car, the body size is very large, in line with the taste of the Chinese people, and the headlights are very sharp.

    The car configuration is very high, the owner said that in addition to the GPS navigation system, automatic headlights, there are internal and external mirrors of automatic anti-glare posture return, daytime running lights visible, automatic air conditioning system, electric adjustment of the main and passenger seats, electric folding of the rearview mirror, multi-function steering wheel, lumbar support adjustment, rearview mirror heating and other functions.

    Of course, the tail shape of the Great Wall Weipai VV7 is really good-looking, although it is a domestic car, but the trace is not inferior to the joint venture car as a whole, simple and not simple, and the exhaust pipe shape is really good-looking.

    Mr. Wu Yu, the owner of the car, said: "I was going to buy a Mazda CX-4, but I happened to meet this Great Wall Weipai VV7, and after the comparison, I chose the Great Wall Weipai VV7C luxury model, I have to say that it really made me feel very relieved." ”

    The rear seat space is also very spacious, and flowers were given when I picked up the car, of course, a little discounted, and now it is really hot, but ** is still a little higher, if it is a little cheaper, it will be close to the people.

Related questions
15 answers2024-08-12

Both cars are young. But. The exterior mirrors fold electrically, and these features are only available on the mid- and high-spec variants of the all-new Tucson. >>>More

17 answers2024-08-12

Tire pressure monitoring is automatic, for example, the system will alert you when the tire pressure is low, and the instrument panel will light up the tire pressure warning.

7 answers2024-08-12

About 200,000 joint venture SUVs, Buick Envision is preferred, the entry-level model is almost 200,000 or so landing, the basic configuration is quite complete, the space is also large, the rear floor is relatively flat, there is no obvious bulge in the middle of the rear row, which is a big benefit for three people in the rear row, and there is a panoramic sunroof, and fuel consumption is not high. Although the power band is so large that the American SUV has accelerated from 0 to 100 kilometers in 10 seconds, the acceleration performance in the middle of this car is very good, and the acceleration at 40-80 mph is very fast (I have personally tested it), and I don't feel the power difference when I usually drive. So I think if you have a budget of 200,000 yuan and take the usual route of buying a car, Envision is the best choice. >>>More

21 answers2024-08-12

There is basically no difference between the ** and configuration of the two cars, which is analyzed from the following five aspects: >>>More

19 answers2024-08-12

The CX4 adopts an engine with a displacement of 92 gasoline. >>>More