-
Churchill's Memoirs, World War II Heroes.
-
World War II first has the number one villain Hitler, it is recommended to read the Barbarossa plan book, and like you said, Tipelskich's History of the Second World War book written from the perspective of a German can have different points of view and positions, give you better inspiration, pay attention to the objectivity of the new book.
-
It is unlikely that there will be a book that is completely objective. If you have time, you can read more, the Americans wrote it, the British wrote it, the Germans, the French dictatorship, the Japanese mainland, and Taiwan.
At the end of the day, you'll find that they all write differently. Combine all the versions to form an objective history of World War II in your mind.
-
"The Rise of the Great Japanese Empire" is also known as "The War History of the Great Japanese Empire".
Memoirs of Khrushchev
-
Apocalypse Believe it or not, I'm sure most people know about it.
-
Look at the history of the First World War of Liddell Hart, the memoirs of Churchill of the First World War, the world war of Peter Hart 1914-1918, and the secret history of the First World War of Mayer, all of which can be bought in the market. Looking at the introduction to World War II, Liddell Hart's World War II history, Churchill's World War II memoirs, Tippelskich's World War II history, and Fuller's Western world military history are also good. These are all macro books.
I studied the Soviet-German war, and when I started, I read the two books on the Eastern Front and the Collision of Giants. If you like the Pacific War, you can watch the Pacific War in Yamaoka Shohachi, and Yu Tianren's vast ocean is a casino, and they are all introductory books. The memoir is not recommended to read at the beginning, I can't understand it, the knowledge is too fragmented, the subjective consciousness is too heavy, and I suffered a loss back then.
After reading and typing so many words, I will give a face and ask for adoption.
-
Agree with the upstairs, memoir aspect.
In World War II, I recommend Churchill's "Memoirs of the Second World War", a tome series, enough to read for a long time, and Man Shuai's "Lost Victory", which has some controversy but is generally the best choice for understanding the German army; The best book I've read is "The Sea of Fearlessness" (by Zhang Jian), which is a must-read if you like the navy. . . As for the Chinese battlefield, how to say, it is politically sensitive, there are not many good books, if you can be calm and have the ability to get it, I recommend "Okamura Ninji's Memoirs" to understand this war from another angle, at least after reading it in our university library, I felt quite a lot.
-
Reading the memoirs of some celebrities, such as Eisenhower, Zhukov and the like, these memoirs are portrayed in real detail and nuanced, and I feel better than those who collect information after the fact.
-
The Soviets made up a good history of the First World War.
-
History of the Second World War published by the People's Publishing House.
-
The book "The History of the Second World War" is undoubtedly one of the most comprehensive authoritative works of all. The author relied on his personal military experience, rich information documents, and interview records of the parties concerned, and collected 22 years to complete this masterpiece. This book has a detailed description of the large and small battles in World War II that lasted for 6 years, and it is laid out in detail.
In addition, the author makes a sober and objective analysis and reflection on this period of history. It is often said that "history is a mirror", and this book can help readers learn from the past and know the present, and the truth of history is still relevant today.
The Complete History of World War II", this book strives to completely reproduce the whole process of World War II, interpret the causes and consequences in detail, and objectively comment on the political economy. Clear the fog, restore the historical truth, and solve many mysteries. It not only tells the war from a macro perspective, but also focuses on the subtleties, and strives to search for clues of history, presenting readers with a different whole history.
Personally, I prefer the former, but the latter is not bad either.
-
I think I bought both. There are different things and opinions in the two books, and there are differences that make people think and go **. History books are not all right, only after reading too much can you make comparisons, make a correct understanding, that is your own thing.
Knowing more about history can make you wiser. Let's do our best.
-
A second book is recommended. Whether the history of the war is close to the truth or not is closely related to the authenticity and breadth of the historical materials mastered by the author. Hart does a better job of this.
-
1: "The Last 100 Days: The Fall of Hitler's Third Reich":
It is one of the masterpieces of the famous American writer and historian John Tolan, and is recognized as the greatest historical documentary work of the 20th century. In the entire history of mankind, there is probably one hundred days as significant as the last 100 days of the Second World War in Europe: within three months, Hitler and Mussolini died, and Nazism and fascism were on the wane.
With a grand structure and expressive cinematic scenes, Tolan shows the thrilling scenes of the European theater in the late Second World War: the breakthrough of Remagen, the hellish bombing of Dresden, the death of a million civilians in eastern Germany, the defense of Prague by Soviet prisoners, Hitler's last days in the bunker, and so on. The author has conducted hundreds of interviews with Witnesses in twenty-one countries, in addition to drawing on thousands of first-hand accounts
Post-mortem reports, journals from the General Staff, a large number of top-secret letters, and private documents are objective, moving, and appealing.
2: "The Last Battle" is a story about ordinary people in war, a story about soldiers and civilians, who are all trapped in despair, frustration and fear of defeat. It is the pinnacle of history, an ingenious interpretation of war and the lives and fates of individuals in the abyss of war, and one of the most monumental works on war.
3: The Origins of World War II is Taylor's most controversial book, in which World War II refers to the war between Germany, Poland, Great Britain and France after September 1939. Taylor boldly reversed the mainstream view of society, pointing out that the outbreak of World War II was not Hitler's plan.
He begins his book by pointing out that too many people are convinced of the so-called "Nuremberg Theory" that World War II was the result of a criminal conspiracy by Hitler and his accomplices. In Taylor's view, this theory was in essence too simplistic and convenient, and it covered up the responsibility of other heads of state and saved the entire German people from the burden of war. This theory also allowed West Germany, which was founded after the war, to join the capitalist camp in the Cold War.
This is logically no, because if you are admitted to a book, your file will go to the school that was admitted, and if he has your file, other schools will not be able to admit you again. Unless this school is willing to hand over your file to a second school, then the school can admit you!
No, even if you write that the payee is a fixed passbook, the money can be remitted to the opening bank of your fixed account account, but the opening bank will not give you the account. Let's start a savings account.
You can find something you like and have a feeling to watch. >>>More
To put it simply, it includes:
After the revision is completed, it will be submitted to the publishing house and passed three reviews (i.e., preliminary review, re-examination, and final review). After three reviews, the editor-in-chief agreed, and the book can be included in the publication plan. >>>More
Then repeat your studies for a year and rush to Peking University.