A historical question about the economy of ancient China

They were all wrong. Because the germ of capitalism is the effect, not the cause. It is precisely because of the great development of the feudal economy that it has led to a large inflow of **.

A is for domestic reasons and CD is for international reasons. B is the co-result of ACD. Because the great development of the commodity economy contributed to the emergence of capitalism.

It is impossible to have a sprout before promoting the growth of the feudal economy.

The forecaster shows the service attitude in two sentences.

I'm skeptical of option A of it too, but option B is definitely wrong. If you still have the impression that the germination of capitalism in the Ming Dynasty refers to the emergence of the phenomenon of "machine owners contributing, and machine workers contributing", so it is limited to domestic and has no connection with foreign countries.

The Ming Dynasty's maritime ban policy stifled the possibility of promoting economic progress abroad, as well as the emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of commerce, regional imbalance, and the compression of the traditional economy, all of which seriously hindered the germination of capitalism.

What if there is the germination of capitalism, this question is about imports and exports, and the problem is about the main causes, and when we encounter this kind of problem, we can only weigh and exclude it.

First of all, item D, the market demand naturally does not need to be explained, and the development of China's economy and the development of productive forces are also important reasons for item A. Due to the opening of new shipping routes, the perfection of the Silk Road, the development of Western capitalism, the world market is being formed and perfected, and it is formally formed after the first work, which facilitates China's exports, and rightly so. The key is item B.

First, China's budding capitalist forces are very weak, and they are still oppressed by the most powerful feudal system in the world, and their role is very constrained. Above the small peasant economy, there are some businessmen, who belong to the landlord class, and the money they earn is not converted into capital, but to buy land, enjoy it, and bribe it. They are the conduits that send outward, while the peasants are the producers, the exploited.

This is an exclusion question, and to exclude the most inappropriate, the other three answers are contributing causes, and B is just in the embryonic stage, which means that the state of China's economic development has little to do with the problem.

b refers to the Hui merchants, mainly in the area of Anhui, Shandong, China, and did not go to the world.

The feudal economy has been developing, this is the original words of the book.

During the Tang and Song dynasties, foreign trade was relatively developed, which was the credit for the establishment of the feudal economy.

At that time, the germination of capitalism was confined to cotton spinning and other fields, and most of them were contributing to the small peasant economy.

Besides, the germ of capitalism has just sprouted in this period, and the time for development is really short, so you can't expect it to produce immediate results, right? If you can't walk, you can't expect it to run. Right? o(∩_o

Summary. Dear, the answer to the first question I have compiled for you is that in the ancient Chinese economy, the exploitation of industry and commerce was particularly serious under the guidance of the concept of feudal society. In feudal society, the landlord class and the scholar class enjoyed a privileged position, and they considered agriculture to be the noblest industry, while commerce and handicrafts were relegated to lowly occupations.

This perception has led to discrimination and exploitation of industry and commerce. The landlord class deprived the peasants of their property and restricted their economic development by imposing heavy taxes on the peasants and exacting miscellaneous taxes. At the same time, merchants and craftsmen were severely restricted and exploited.

They were forbidden to own land and could not participate in the management of the land, but could only engage in commerce and handicrafts. They had to pay high rents and taxes to the landlord class, while also enduring restrictions and discrimination. In addition, there was a strict hierarchy and feudal etiquette in feudal society, and merchants and craftsmen had a low social status, were regarded as an inferior group, and were discriminated against and excluded.

The existence of these concepts and systems has led to the exploitation and oppression of industry and commerce in economic development, resulting in serious inequity and inequality.

Under the guidance of the concept of the ancient Chinese economy, the exploitation of industry and commerce was particularly serious.

How to do this question.

Dear, the answer to the first question I have compiled for you is that in the ancient Chinese economy, the exploitation of industry and commerce was particularly serious under the guidance of the concept of feudal society. In feudal society, the landlord class and the scholar class enjoyed a privileged position, and they considered agriculture to be the noblest industry, while commerce and handicrafts were relegated to lowly occupations. This perception has led to discrimination and exploitation of industry and commerce.

The landlord class deprived the peasants of their property and restricted their economic development by imposing heavy taxes on the peasants and exacting miscellaneous taxes. At the same time, merchants and craftsmen were severely restricted and exploited. They were forbidden to own land and could not participate in the management of the land, but could only engage in commerce and handicrafts.

They had to pay high rents and taxes to the landlord class, while also enduring restrictions and discrimination. In addition, there was a strict hierarchy and feudal etiquette in feudal society, and merchants and craftsmen had a low social status, and were regarded as a low-class group of people, and were discriminated against and excluded. The existence of these concepts and systems has led to the exploitation and oppression of industry and commerce in the course of economic development, resulting in serious injustice and unfair disrepute.

Dear, this is part of the result, please be patient a little longer, the calculation will take time.

China's ancient commerce was born in the pre-Qin period, initially developed in the Qin and Han dynasties, and further developed in the Sui and Tang dynasties.

The commodity economy first arose from the second social division of labor, that is, the separation of handicrafts from agriculture and further expansion, and in the third great social division of labor, an important medium of the commodity economy appeared, the merchants.

At the end of primitive society, with the development of social productive forces, there was an accidental exchange; When the division of labor between animal husbandry and agriculture took place, the exchange of commodities gradually expanded; Later there was a division of labor between handicrafts and agriculture, which led to the production of commodities directly for the purpose of exchange; The production of commodities regularized the exchange of commodities, which in turn gave rise to money and the emergence of a commodity economy. China's ancient commerce was born in the pre-Qin period, initially developed in the Qin and Han dynasties, and further developed in the Sui and Tang dynasties.

In the Sui and Tang dynasties, Chang'an City (Commercial District) and Fang (Residential Area) were separated and strictly managed, and the materials clearly matched the commercial activities in the residential area, so AB excluded. c Historically. Item D is wrong, there is the word "Royal Street" in the material, so it is said to be a capital chain city, and Suzhou was not the capital in the Ming Dynasty.

Analysis: In the textbook of our high school Sanfeng slow belt, it is written which macro is separated from the city (commercial area) and fang (residential area) of the Sui and Tang dynasties. By the time of the Northern Song Dynasty, the commercial activities of big cities had broken through the restrictions of cities and squares, and the scene in the poem appeared in Yinlu.

The Ming Dynasty was even after the Northern Song Dynasty, and the question was "the earliest", so it was excluded. Look).

The focus of this poem is about the farmer's large number of cash crops such as mulberry hemp, as well as the situation of the farmer's mulberry picking!

Mulberry hemp was an important daily necessities in the Tang Dynasty and an important cash crop in ancient times. Mass cultivation leads to surplus products, and the emergence of surplus products leads to the emergence of commodities and the prosperity of commerce.

So this poem clearly embodies the commercial cultivation of cash crops.

The small-scale peasant economy is self-sufficient, and when the product appears as a surplus commodity, there is a surplus, so d is not the focus of this poem.

b。The key message in the poem is that the peasants planted mulberry and hemp, and the women picked mulberry leaves, which were already common in some areas of the Tang Dynasty.

Mulberry, hemp and other cash crops, on the one hand, are the needs of the development of household sideline business, there is also the need for circulation, so item B is selected.

When a child buys a coat, it means that there is an exchange of goods, and an important premise of commodity exchange is the development of handicrafts.

It does not reflect this problem, and does not reflect the fact that men plough the fields and women weave cloth. It was just that the cloth woven by women began to be traded as a commodity.

The characteristics of the small-scale peasant economy have to emphasize two parts: 1. male farming, 2. female weaving. The first sentence emphasizes planting, the second emphasizes picking, and these are cash crops. This question does not address the male farming, agriculture, and weaving, simple handicrafts.

It's always there, it's just not obvious. It's a bit confusing with business concepts. There are no clear boundaries.

During the Song Dynasty, the commodity economy began to be active. The proof is because the world's earliest banknote appeared in the Sichuan region, Jiaozi. It was not until the budding emergence of capitalism in the middle and late Ming Dynasty.

In a slave society, there is a division of labor, there is cooperation, and bartering is the circle of the commodity economy.

The commodity economy is the second social division of labor, that is, the separation of handicrafts from agriculture and further expansion, and in the third great social division of labor (agriculture and handicrafts), an important medium of the commodity economy - merchants appeared. When the commodity economy continues to develop and the exchange between commodities is mainly allocated by the market, this kind of socialized commodity economy with resources allocated by the market is the market economy.

There is no doubt that the commodity economy arose at the end of primitive societies.