The issue of the inheritance of the house, the issue of the inheritance of the property

Let me break it down for you. The owner of the house is your grandfather, and after his death, assuming that the house is 1, because it is the joint property of the husband and wife, the house is divided into two parts. 1 2 is your grandma's, 1 2 is your grandpa's.

These 1 2 of your grandfather's inheritance was divided among three heirs, your father, your uncle, and your grandmother. In other words, the last three heirs each get 1 3 of your grandfather's estate, because as mentioned earlier, your grandfather's estate accounts for 1 2 of the whole house, so it means that each of these three heirs gets 1 6 of the total house. In the end, your grandmother gets the most, counting the previous 1 2 is the joint property of the husband and wife, and a total of 2 3;Your dad and your uncle each get 1 6.

First-in-line heirs include: spouse, parents, and children. Therefore, you, as the grandson, are the second-in-line heirs. In the case of first-order heirs, there is no right to receive the inheritance.

Your father is alive, and you have no right to inherit your grandfather's estate. At present, your father signed to renounce the inheritance, and after the death of your grandmother, you have no right to inherit.

You are not the legal heir and have no right to inherit. And if your father renounces the inheritance in writing, he can't inherit it.

The house allocated by the unit is the right to use, and there is no inheritance problem with the right to use, and your uncle will compensate your father, which is good.

Your grandfather's house, your father is still alive, and you have no right to inherit.

So without a quarter of you, let it go. Stop torturing yourself.

Your grandmother has full control over her property.

Article 29 of Chapter 2, Section 3 of the Property Law, "Other Provisions", states that "if a real right is acquired by inheritance or bequest, it shall take effect from the beginning of the inheritance or bequest". At the same time, Article 31 of the Law stipulates that "if a person enjoys a real property right in accordance with the provisions of Articles 28 to 30 of this Law, and disposes of the real right, if it is necessary to go through registration in accordance with the law, it shall not take effect as a real right without registration". Thus, the heirs enjoy the ownership of the immovable property from the beginning of the inheritance, but the disposition of the immovable property shall not have the effect of real right until the change is registered in accordance with the registration authority where the immovable property is located.

When the grandfather transferred his property to the grandmother's name during his lifetime, the grandmother enjoyed the ownership of the real estate and the house.

As for what you said about how the children and spouses divide the property?

Article 10 The inheritance shall be carried out in the following order:

First order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not. If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

The term "children" in this Act includes legitimate children, illegitimate children, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

The term "parents" in this Act includes biological parents, adoptive parents and step-parents in a dependent relationship.

The term "brothers and sisters" in this Law includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

Article 11: Where the children of the decedent die before the decedent, the descendants of the decedent's children are to inherit by subrogation. A subrogated heir can generally only inherit his father's or mother's share of the estate.

Article 12. Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her father-in-law or mother-in-law, or a widowed son-in-law to her father-in-law or mother-in-law, she is to be the first-order heir.

Article 13: The share of inheritance inherited by heirs in the same order shall generally be equal.

Heirs who lack the ability to work who have special difficulties in life shall be taken care of when distributing the inheritance.

Heirs who have fulfilled their primary obligation to support the decedent or who live with the decedent may receive an additional share of the estate when the estate is distributed.

If an heir who has the ability and the capacity to support does not fulfill his obligation to support, the inheritance shall be distributed without or less.

Where the heirs agree through consultation, it may also be unequal.

Article 14 Persons other than the heirs who lack the ability to work and do not have a living who rely on the support of the decedent, or those who do not support the decedent more than the heirs, may be distributed to them an appropriate inheritance.

According to what you said, the owner of this house was the army before 97 years, and your father and the army had a house lease relationship, so the ownership of the house was not involved.

And in 97, after your father's death, just in time for your father's army to carry out housing reform, your stepmother used your father's seniority and their own savings to buy the property right of the house according to the provisions of the housing reform policy, and registered the owner of the house in your stepmother's name, these acts are legal and protected by law, and you have no right to interfere.

Because your father only had the right to use the house when he was alive, and he did not have the right to feast on the house, there was no such thing as the inheritance of the house property, and you could not talk about the inheritance of the house property right from the beginning.