Can I apply for a patent for a self designed word art?

This situation falls under the umbrella of intellectual property.

It refers to individuals in the fields of culture and art.

The exclusive rights and intellectual property rights enjoyed by intellectual achievements created and completed on the basis of mental work in accordance with the law only include copyrights, patent rights, trademark rights, and name marking rights, but do not include the rights of scientific discoveries, inventions, and other scientific and technological achievements.

If the designer wants to use this font to achieve the purpose of commercial profit, first of all, go to the patent office to declare the patent right and register the product logo, if only to maintain their own authorship and copyright, in order to avoid some ** without the designer's authorization and use the font you designed for profit, then the copyright is owned by the designer by default.

This is legally.

But in fact, it is difficult to pursue responsibility for copyright disputes on the Internet nowadays, not to mention that fonts are shared on the Internet now, and no one will spend money to buy a font to use.

Therefore, it is difficult to achieve the purpose of profit.

Hence some designers.

Mostly the same as the author of the Warcraft map.

Choose to work with some professional **.

The ** is authorized to be used for the purpose of making money.

That is, the designer makes a set of fonts.

Give the designer an agreed remuneration.

The designer gave up other rights except the right of authorship, which is difficult to make for personal profit.

Unless the designer makes the font very appealing.

Like the advertising industry, it specializes in designing temporary pop fonts.

But that's not for typing.

It's graphic design.

As for making fonts.

If it's just a simple production, then it's okay in word, if you want to do art, it's good word art.

It's going to be 3D.

Most of the fonts in Windows are made with these two software.

This is a general field that cannot be protected by patents, etc., but you can introduce this font through an article for the purpose of sharing consensus, and thus introduce yourself.

WordArt is not a technical solution and cannot be patented. But it can be protected by copyright.

It is not possible to apply for a patent, which protects a specific technical solution.

Artistic fonts apply for copyright protection.

1) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, the trademark identical to the registered trademark is used on the same goods;

2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, Sakura uses a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same kind of goods, or uses a trademark identical or similar to its registered trademark on similar goods, which is likely to cause confusion;

3) Selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;

4) Forging or manufacturing the logo of another person's registered trademark without authorization, or selling the logo of a registered trademark that is forged or manufactured without authorization;

5) Replacing the registered trademark without the consent of the trademark registrant and putting the goods with the replaced trademark on the market;

6) Intentionally facilitating the infringement of others' exclusive right to use a trademark, or helping others to infringe upon the exclusive right to use a trademark;

7) Causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of another person.

1. Elements of trademark infringement.

1.There must be an illegal act, that is, the perpetrator has carried out the act of selling goods with counterfeit registered trademarks;

2.There must be a fact of damage, that is, the act of selling counterfeit trademark goods carried out by the actor has caused the damage to the trademark owner's code rent. The sale of goods counterfeiting the registered trademarks of others will cause serious property losses to the right holders, and at the same time, it will also cause goodwill damage to the entities that enjoy the registered trademark rights.

Both property loss and goodwill damage are facts.

3.The offender is subjectively at fault, that is, the perpetrator has known or should have known about the fact that the goods sold are counterfeit registered trademarks.

4.There must be a causal relationship between the illegal act and the harmful consequences, that is, the relationship between the sales behavior of the wrongdoer and the damage caused to the trademark owner is antecedent-and-consequential.