Is it necessary to try love before marriage is risky or beneficial?

Of course, it's necessary, if you fall in love with someone else before, don't reciprocate, don't want to be willing in the future, why do you care about finding a lifelong partner.

I don't think it's better to try marriage.

Because the trial marriage has to live with others, people in the society will know about your experience, and many people are very taboo about this, so it is best for two people to go to the palace of marriage.

It's all nonsense, what age is it now, premarital sex is normal, and premarital cohabitation is normal.

If you are a woman, it is better to cherish yourself and not give it in advance.

The risk is high, pregnancy, miscarriage, and contracting sexually transmitted diseases are not uncommon.

In the concept of many parents, it is not good to live together without marriage, and some even have received a marriage certificate, and they feel that living together will be gossiped about if they have not held a banquet. Especially the parents of the girls, they feel that this is for their daughter's good, to prevent others from talking about it in the future. But in fact, it's not, don't say anything **, social statistics, just say that there are a lot of friends around me who want to divorce when they get married, ask the reason and say that many problems have come after living together, it turns out that two people are only suitable for being together, but not suitable for living together, there are too many different living habits that cannot be adapted, especially those who live with their parents or live close.

When many people first get married, they still have a heart that is ready to move, and there are good and bad sides to this, and often at this time contradictions arise. Some can run in with each other, but there is no guarantee that they will not become a seed; Some of them began to drift away at this time. There are too many two kinds of marriages in real life, one is that one party goes out of bounds and is discovered by the other party, quarrels, divorces, or endures; The second is that both sides go out to play and do not interfere with each other.

Both live lives in name only. Although all this is not entirely due to the problem of "trying love before marriage", it cannot be said that it does not exist, let alone plays a role in the beginning.

Good friend Miss W is a good example, because her family lives far away, it takes hours to commute to and from work, and after falling in love, her boyfriend almost always takes her home after work. Her boyfriend is also busy with work and pressure, so after they got the marriage certificate, she asked Miss W if they could live together first, so that it would be convenient for everyone and they could run in first. However, Miss W's family disagreed, saying that this was not decent, and that they did not know that they were husband and wife without drinking, and they could not see anyone and show them the marriage certificate.

After they could live together, Miss W became unaccustomed and couldn't sleep every night. I am bored with my former boyfriend and my current husband, and I have a lot of dissatisfaction with my old woman. In short, all kinds of harmony that used to be have become discordant.

She told me privately that although she had just gotten married, she had thought about divorce.

So, I think that if you are not married, try to live together for a while, living together does not mean that you have to do something, but depending on each other's lifestyles and living habits, everyone refers to whether Sakura is acceptable. Don't be deceived by old concepts, don't talk about a community now, even neighbors don't necessarily know each other, so why care too much about other people's eyes, after all, the future life is your own life, and it has nothing to do with others.

Premarital cohabitation, as the name suggests, is a kind of sexual relationship between a man and a woman who live together openly or secretly in the name of husband and wife before marriage. The goal of the two parties is to get married, so it means "trial marriage".

Premarital cohabitation is a relatively new model of marriage that gives couples the opportunity to get to know each other better before they get married, and thus better determine whether they are suitable for marriage. It can also give couples the opportunity to resolve some of the family's problems before they get married, thus reducing the problems that may arise after marriage.

However, before deciding to live together before marriage, there are two things that must be taken seriously:

First, this kind of relationship is not protected by law in our country, and the current law does not interfere with the cohabitation of both parties without a spouse, and the cohabitation of one or both spouses is an illegal act, and if the circumstances are serious, it will constitute the crime of bigamy and be punished by law.

The second is trial marriage, can marriage really be tested? The fact is that cohabitation and marriage are two completely different psychological states, and marriage cannot be tried. Either get married logically, or break up miserably. The latter is not unlikely.

So, strictly speaking, there is no need to live together before marriage.

Considering that it is the characteristics of women who are most hurt by the tragic breakup after premarital cohabitation, it is recommended that women should focus on figuring out five questions before premarital cohabitation

Clause. 1. Whether the boyfriend is reliable in conduct. Those who are unreliable or suspicious cannot live together before marriage;

Clause. 2. Is the love cycle with your boyfriend long enough, if it has not reached at least one spring, summer, autumn and winter, it means that you don't know each other carefully enough, and you can't or need to postpone premarital cohabitation;

Clause. 3. At least one of the two people with the boyfriend has the financial strength to maintain the living expenses of cohabitation before marriage, and those who do not have sufficient financial strength cannot live together before marriage;

Clause. Fourth, it is not appropriate for two people to live together before marriage if their "three views" are inconsistent;

Clause. 5. It is not appropriate for both men and women to live together before marriage if they are patient with their respective shortcomings and are not tolerant.

I think it's necessary, and in fact there are many girls who are considering "cohabitation trials" before marriage.

But as a woman, she had to consider the real risks of the situation, especially the lack of legal protection for women.

Premarital cohabitation is not necessarily a life-saving gold medal to prevent divorce, it can bring challenges to the relationship:

1.This may be the end of the relationship.

It took a lot of time to get tired of being together, but instead saw each other's big and small shortcomings, and saw too much ugliness at once, and the personalities were incompatible, and the relationship blew up.

2.The husband may use premarital cohabitation as an excuse to delay the marriage. Although he lived the life of husband and wife, he did not have the security of marriage.

3. The woman may become the giver of the relationship, taking on the role of taking care of the other party and taking care of daily life, but she does not get the necessary guarantees.

From a legal point of view, there is also a difference between a legal conjugal relationship and a premarital cohabitation relationship. An unmarried man and a woman living together are in a cohabitation relationship. This kind of cohabitation is not protected by law and is not friendly to women.

The differences include: 1. If the cohabiting party proposes to break up, it is because there is no legal marital relationship, and the woman voluntarily cohabits with the man, and there is no coercion. Therefore, there is no question of compensation from the man to the woman, nor is there any question of compensation for moral damages.

2.There is no legal conjugal relationship between the man and the woman, but only an unmarried cohabitation relationship. Therefore, it cannot be divided according to the principle of joint property of husband and wife, but should be divided by reference to the partnership property relationship.

There are risks and opportunities, so you need to choose carefully.