What is responsibility and what exactly is responsibility?

In essence, a sense of responsibility requires not only self-interest, but also the benefit of others, the cause, the country, and society, and when one's own interests contradict the interests of the state, society, and others, the interests of the state, society, and others should be put first.

Only when people have a sense of responsibility can they have the inexhaustible motivation to drive themselves to move forward bravely all their lives, can they feel that many meaningful things need to be done by themselves, can they feel the value and significance of their own existence, and can they truly gain people's trust and respect.

A sense of responsibility is a mental state of consciously taking the initiative to do all beneficial things inside and outside. The difference between a sense of responsibility and ordinary psychological emotion is that it belongs to the category of social moral psychology and is an important content of ideological and moral quality.

A sense of responsibility is something that makes you hold on, and because of responsibility you can't escape, so it forces you to persevere.

A sense of responsibility, in fact, is sometimes a responsibility to oneself, but also for others.

You must have a sense of responsibility in everything you do, so that you will have more motivation to work.

will be responsible.

It is common to hear many women say that they need to find a responsible man, or the company's human resources department holds a job fair and says that they need to find a responsible employee so that they can be responsible for their work. The word sense of responsibility sounds noble, and we like to praise a person for being responsible. We like to criticize a person and say that he has no sense of responsibility.

So, what is responsibility? The general understanding is that if a person does things seriously and responsibly, completes what he should do without any deductions, and does not shirk, it is said that this person has a sense of responsibility. However, if the duty shows that the person should do it, and he is capable of doing it, and he has no way to push it to others, then isn't it a matter of course for him to accomplish it, and there is no need to praise him for having a sense of responsibility.

The criterion for evaluating him should be the degree to which he accomplished the thing itself, such as efficiency, cost, effectiveness, etc. Rather than a sense of responsibility, which has no criteria for judgment and is completed by personal feelings.

In addition, when a person encounters many problems in life, he makes a lot of decisions, but in the end these decisions do not have a good result, so he puts the responsibility of not getting a good result on other factors, such as the environment, others and other external factors. Well, we say that the person has no sense of responsibility. But, in fact, judging from the results, the decisions he made did not have a good result, and he had to bear this bad result, because he was really affected by the bad ones, and he had to bear a lot of pressure.

At this time, the way the brain works determines that some of the stress needs to be released, so he says to put the blame on other factors. In this way, although on the surface he is saying that it is not my fault, in fact he bears the consequences and responsibilities. So, can we say that the person has no sense of responsibility?

I don't think so. The most important thing is to learn to reflect on yourself, whether from the inside or outside, to find the essence of the matter, and figure out why you made the wrong decision before, so that you can avoid making mistakes in the future. None of this can be summed up without a sense of responsibility.

I think it is more important to criticize this person for his lack of ability, his inability to make the right choices. What he needs to improve is his own abilities. Only when the ability is improved and things are done easily and correctly, there will be no question of whether there is a sense of responsibility or not.

Therefore, what we should all learn is how to face problems, solve problems, reflect on problems, and improve our abilities. In this way, everything that needs to be done with a sense of responsibility will be simple, and doing things well will bring positive feedback in itself, so that they will be more willing to do things well. Just talking about whether you have a sense of responsibility or not will not help you solve things and improve yourself.

Recently, I listened to a program of Luo Ji Siwei, which talked about the topic of "sense of responsibility". What is Responsibility? It may seem cliché, but it's not very precisely defined.

For example, is it a sense of responsibility to do your job honestly? After all, as an incumbent, doing the job at hand well and doing it well must be a responsible performance.

But there is another point of view that is different, or even the opposite, that doing one's own things well is not only not a performance of responsibility, but a manifestation of irresponsibility.

It sounds counterintuitive, but when you hear it, it makes sense. You might as well think about it this way, if we only do our own work, only guard our own one-third of an acre, and don't care about other things or other people, isn't this a kind of narrow individualism? Isn't that an irresponsible act?

When you think about it this way, it seems right.

I made up a situation in my mind: When the doorman of a military center was on guard duty, he saw a gangster robbing a passer-by with a knife on the opposite street corner, so should he leave his post to rescue the passerby? If you think about it carefully, it seems that it is not right to go, and it is not right not to go.

If you go, it is an unauthorized departure from your post and not a sign of responsibility. No, as a soldier, what is the point of being a soldier who ignores criminals and harms ordinary people? You see, it's not human inside and out.

Therefore, there is no precise definition of responsibility, and it has different connotations in the eyes of different people. It is a responsibility to stick to your position and responsibilities, and it is also a responsibility to take a long-term view to do something that should not be done for you. You can't say which one is right and which is wrong.

This is a bit like the outlook on life, as long as you abide by the law and do not openly violate public order and good customs, there is no absolute wrong and absolute right. It's just an option.

Responsibility is the same, and so are many things in our lives. There is no right or wrong, it is just one of your own choices. What we have to do is just accept the choices of others, don't rashly reject the opposite point of view, try to hide two completely different views and perceptions in our minds, and we can still think and act freely, which is what an independent personality should be.