What are the benefits of a Dink family? The pros and cons of the Dink family

The advantage is freedom, and you can enjoy the life of the two of you without burden, because there is no mortgage, tuition fees, and the legend that it takes four million to raise a child, etc.

Dink has less children, and if the two parties are very good at managing relationships, the intimacy of the family will be far greater than that of the family that marries and has children with both families.

will face less financial pressure: Except for a very small number of local tyrants, many parents are afraid to buy some flashy but happy things after giving birth, and everything must first consider how to make their children live better.

When you are old, you don't have to balance your daughter-in-law or son-in-law, you don't have to look at your grandchildren and be complained, and you don't have to worry about the birth, growth, study, work, marriage, and security of another person until you die. You can enjoy life with your heart, slowly, and savoring life.

At some point in your life, you finally don't have to be "forcibly bound" by your family or society: I define the term "strong bondage" this way to mean that your life is largely determined by external mechanisms. For example, the pressure of raising children, the pressure of children getting married, and so on.

Good outside: can devote yourself to work and life, and has a high quality of life.

When a woman gives birth to a child, she is shortening her youth and lifespan, and the woman is old. Men think, so why not be a Dink family better, and live a world of 2 people more romantic.

There is no pressure, no burden, and you can do whatever you want. Live more chic than your peers, save some pension money when you are old, and live a good life.

I tell you that I have a baby's position, you must be ready for money to give birth to a baby, otherwise the pressure is great, the so-called motivation, there is, but the pressure is more, if I am given a choice, I must wait for myself to have conditions, or ready to give birth, not that the child is not cute, and the child comes out, which means the beginning of the contradiction.

The advantage of Dink is that the two of them have more free time, spend more money on themselves, worry less about things, and don't have to swallow their anger for the sake of their children.

I am very responsible for the experience of a two-child family: It's so cool to have no children. How much money you have, how much you want, how you want to enjoy it, as long as you don't break the law, do whatever you want.

Relaxed, free and unburdened, sweet and happy without worries.

Be free, have no worries, don't cling to the present and don't worry about the future

With more money and time, I can do what I want to do.

The advantage is that there are fewer ties when you want to divorce.

The current environment, Dink definitely makes sense, and it is not easy for people to live.

Free don't want to want

You can only be alone when you are old, it's okay to go together, but it's even worse if you go first.

This is completely "taking the belly of others with your own heart", and a woman's life is incomplete without having children, which is not right or wrong. And the purpose of the Dink family is "not to have children", these two sentences themselves are not in conflict, and there is no point in talking about them together. It's like an atheist saying that God doesn't exist and a theist saying that God exists, which is itself antithetical, and neither is wrong.

Take the phrase "a woman's life is incomplete if she doesn't have children", which has defined a woman's life, and it directly defines "giving birth to children" as one of the criteria for "a woman's complete life". As long as you have a child, your life is complete, and if you don't have a child, you are not complete. But is there only a child in a person's life?

I say this not to say that women should not have children, but to tell the subject that a woman's life is not only about having children, but also the definition of "complete life" is also different, and whether your definition of life is right or wrong, it does not mean that I also want to define life in this way.

And the Dink family itself stands on the opposite side of "having children after marriage", just as we think that "a woman's life is incomplete if she doesn't have children", they think that two people together "shouldn't have children". In other words, for those Dink families, having a child will make their life flawed or regretful, and a life that would have been perfect has become imperfect because of having children. Is this wrong?

Although it is a little different from the thinking of most ordinary family members, it can't be said that what they say is wrong, right?

As for the advantages and disadvantages of the Dink family, it depends on your analysis from that aspect, and you also need to refer to the Eastern and Western cultures to define it. Taking Oriental culture as an example, after the husband and wife are old, there is no one to support the elderly, they cannot enjoy the fun of their children's knees, they may not be able to hold grandchildren in this life, and there is no one to inherit the inheritance they have saved. But after having children, you can enjoy these "blessings", and these are the biggest gaps.

The advantage is that there is not so much pressure, there is no need to raise children, and women will not suffer the pain of having children and raising children, while the disadvantage is that they cannot experience the happiness brought by children, and they will feel lonely when they are old.

The advantage is that you don't have to delay your work for the sake of your children, you don't have to spend money and energy on your children, and the couple is free; The disadvantage is that you can't experience the joy of raising children, lack a parent-child relationship, and may feel lonely when you get old.

The advantage of the Dink family is that it is quiet, it can live in a two-person world, it is not so burdensome, and it is relatively free.

The disadvantage is that you can't enjoy the happiness of being a parent, and the wonderful feeling of having children and grandchildren.

When you get old, if one of you leaves first, you will be left with a sense of loneliness.

I don't think women are gone.

Life is not perfect when you have children. Whether or not to have children is up to the woman herself, not to others. Dink families can have more freedom than families with children, and have more money and time to experience a different life.

But relatively speaking, the atmosphere of the environment is much lighter than that of families with children, not so lively, and those heart-warming little anecdotes between parents and children will not be staged in the Dink family.

Good outside: can devote yourself to work and life, and has a high quality of life.

Disadvantages: If you don't stick to the end, it is easy to become an elderly mother, if you persist to the end, you must and can only go to a nursing home when you are old.

In fact, these are all personal choices.

The advantage is that you can enjoy the life of two people without burden.

Because of the mortgage, the tuition fee, and the legend that it takes four million to raise a child, and so on, if this situation is prevalent in society, it is not conducive to human reproduction.

The Dink family comes.

is a kind of childlessness.

The marriage and family of the source is transliterated from the abbreviation of the English "baidouble income no kids", that is, double double income, do not have children. The DAO members of the Dink family are generally working-class people with stable incomes, and many of them are middle-class members of society. Many of them think that raising children is a very troublesome thing financially and psychologically, which will hinder the quality of family life and the relationship between husband and wife, and some are worried about the pressure of social competition and serious environmental pollution in the future, so they decide not to have children.

Since the 80s of the last century, this group has quietly appeared in our country and has been slowly understood and accepted by more and more people.

The good thing is that you have a child, and the bad thing is that it will bring a lot of trouble to your family.

1. Benefits of the Dink family. The Dink family does not have children, so compared with families with children, the Dink family does not have to worry about children's affairs, and does not need to invest a lot of energy and money to provide good education and growth conditions for children; Without the stress of feeding children, living conditions will be much easier.

2. The disadvantages of the Dink family. The relationship between husband and wife is prone to cracks, and children are an important link to maintain the relationship between husband and wife. Lonely in their later years, the Dinks have no children around them, and whenever other elderly people enjoy the blessings of their children and grandchildren, they may feel that their lives lack warmth; Compared with normal families, although the couples of the Dink family enjoyed the happiness and freedom of their youth, they did not have children to support them in their old age.

Dink is a way of life, which means that couples do not want children, mainly because of personal wishes or financial means. Dink has a lot of advantages and disadvantages, which we will elaborate on below.

Feel free: The Dink couple has no children, no cumbersome family responsibilities, and life will be more free.

Economic pressures: Dink couples do not need to raise their first acre of children, there is no financial pressure, and they can focus more on their careers and personal hobbies.

Social status: Dink couples have a relatively high status in society because they are not responsible for the education and life of their offspring.

Mental health: Dink couples do not have children, they will not be pressured by family and loved ones, and there is less psychological pressure, which is conducive to maintaining mental health.

Sex is more satisfying: Dink couples may be more satisfied with sex because there is no need to think about reproduction.

Loneliness:The Dinks have no children and can feel lonely and lost.

Physical health problems: Dink couples may be more prone to physical problems due to not having children, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, etc.

Lack of family support: If one of the spouses needs to be taken care of, Dink may face problems with family support.

Social pressure: Dink couples may be subject to social pressure and discrimination, and may be more acceptable if they have children.

If the couple does not want children, it may affect the relationship between the two people, because children are an important part of the couple's relationship, and not having children can make the relationship estranged. However, if both people are willing to try and embrace this lifestyle, their relationship may be more stable and strong.