Why do we value our own ability and others value our character?

Why do we value our own ability, and what others look at us is our character. That's because no matter how bad a person's character is, he will not calculate himself, nor will he bully himself, nor will he calculate himself. So we never pay too much attention to our character.

When we focus on our character, it's because there's anything in the outside world that makes us want to focus on that aspect. For others, no matter how powerful you are, a strong person can create time, change the world, and destroy the world. A person with poor character, the disaster it can bring is immeasurable, but a person who is very good, although the ability may not be as good as you, but he will not cause any great harm, the value he creates is always positive, and the value created by a person with poor character is not only negative, it is simply a geometric decreasing trend.

So in the eyes of anyone, they will not pay attention to whether your ability is strong, maybe you need a strong person to take charge for a while, but once this time is over, they will not hesitate to kick you out, no matter how strong your ability is, your character is not good, you can't be reliable, you can't stay! On the contrary, people with good character may be lacking in ability, but they are trustworthy and trustworthy. In times of great right and wrong, strong winds and waves, we can work with us to defend against foreign enemies.

If a person with strong ability and good character is really a top talent in society, it must be hot. There's no one who doesn't like this kind of talent. People with poor character are always at the bottom of the list, and people with good character are the worst and in the middle.

He will never exist below the middle.

This may seem difficult and reasonable, but we can look at it from two perspectives.

On the one hand, we can explain this problem with the interests that people like to chase the most, we can improve our ability to chase interests by improving our own ability, and maximize the pursuit of our interests, and for others, if they can't be used by me, then they will inevitably damage our interests at will, and if his character is poor, it may damage your interests. This is only one aspect, Xiaolong's previous leaders often told Xiaolong, in the workplace, small wins rely on ability, big wins look at character, we can often see that some large companies when choosing partners, would rather choose to earn a little less, but will choose a more stable, more trustworthy, more reliable partner, poor is good alone, up to the world, when you need to use others, more need to pay attention to a risk problem! <>

But on the other hand, after all, people are a social creature, you not only have to survive on your own, but also based on the society, to get the recognition of the team, I remember once watching a TV show, it was a job search program, the name Xiaolong didn't remember for a while, he was a sales champion, wanted to find a job, when talking about the past successful sales cases, he proudly gave an example, he successfully sold a course to a cleaner, and the cleaner's income was only 2000 yuan, and the course he sells is 5000 yuan, we all know that there is a lot of water in the sale of this thing, a bottom cleaner, he can't distinguish the gold content of this, at that time he was disliked by the boss because of this example, I remember that there was a boss who said a particularly classic sentence, I believe in your ability, but I am not optimistic about your character

We are based on society, many people will think about how to improve their abilities, but in the eyes of others, they really just care more about your character, your ability has nothing to do with them, unless, he is your boss, but if the boss wants to improve you, it still depends on your character.

As a novice in the workplace, I think there are really a lot of things in our workplace that we need to learn and understand.

As the saying goes, the master leads the door, and the practice is in the individual, so more often we rely on ourselves in the workplace, many times you go to a company to apply for an interview, when you face HR, I think in fact, in many cases, whether you can successfully interview, you think that it is all about your ability or not, in fact, it is not, many times it is determined by HR's attitude and observation of you.

This topic is about the problem of character, in fact, I think it is not only in the workplace, but also everywhere in our lives, so if you think that as long as your ability is good, you can be promoted, I think you may not have found anything in the workplace, I think in fact, many times our leaders and our bosses, look at their subordinate employees, and assess their sometimes not only their ability, I think it's more about their loyalty to the company and their contribution to the company, because sometimes a project in the company can't be completed by one person, although your ability is very strong, but it is not possible to fight alone.

So at this time, you need to have the spirit of unity, have a sense of teamwork, and your character should be good enough, because in fact, the people who are most needed in the company are those who can unite everyone and gather everyone's strength, so that it is helpful to the company and can grow together with the company, so I think that many times you should not only focus on improving your ability there, but also improve your character sometimes.

Because in our own opinion, no matter what we do, ability is equivalent to a stepping stone, just like many of us go to college just for a diploma, why? Quite simply, you can get this diploma to prove that you are capable of learning, and you will naturally be more competitive than those who do not have a diploma.

But if you are a corporate recruiter, you may have a different idea, in a large enterprise, there are many capable people, 285 911 is countless, so others care more about your ability but your character. A person with good character, even if his ability is slightly worse, but his character can win him a higher score, because what others lack here is not ability, but someone who has some personal features.

I have heard some recruitment stories, one of which is that when a company was in the first round of recruitment, everyone passed the written test. Then I arrived at the second round of interviews, and there was a small piece of paper at the door of the interview, but no one paid attention to pick it up. Halfway through the interview, a young man picked up a small piece of paper after going in for the interview.

After the final interview, the young man was hired.

A very simple detail, but it determines our success or failure. Sometimes the recruiter does not value your talent, but your valuable character, or honesty, or details, or calmness, etc., and there are also companies when looking for partners, deliberately say something similar to the suspicion of tax evasion, some bosses hesitate, some actually agreed, and only a few people can resolutely refuse. I think the person who finally refuses is the most likely to succeed in the end.

Ability can be cultivated, but character is a habit formed by our long-term life. Having some good character is often much more important than ability. Therefore, no matter what you are doing, whether it is starting a business or getting a job, you must be a person with reliable character, and I think such a person can be more respected and welcomed by others.

People with bad character look annoying.

Character is flaunted to others, have you ever reviewed yourself?

As a leader, what do you value more in terms of ability and character? Ability can be cultivated and improved through exercise, training, and learning in the unit, but character is the embodiment of a person's moral quality, and a person does not want to change himself, and it is difficult for others and units to change his character. As a leader, you must be able to select and appoint talents, discerning people, being virtuous is about character, and ability is about ability, and both must be possessed is the leader's favorite.

What do leaders value more? In fact, it also depends on the leader's personal choice. Some people's abilities and abilities are not reflected all at once, and only long-term contact can observe their character and abilities.

If it is a person of very poor character, everyone will hate such a person, and naturally the leader will also eliminate such a person. But if a person's ability is poor, it can't be the reason why everyone hates it, and maybe there is a possibility of improvement.

If I am a leader, of course, I pay more attention to character, and people with poor character are in the unit, and I don't feel at ease when I give him tasks, and I don't have a sense of trust at all. Without trust, important work will not be entrusted to him. If a person's ability is poor, then do some simple work, different positions need people, and slowly exercise the ability will always improve.

As a leader, perhaps many people value character more! No matter how outstanding the ability is, but the character is not good......This road can not go far, ability is attached to the character, character is a person and the things that have been born, it is difficult to change and copy if you want to shape it; But the ability is different, the replasticity is very strong, and it can be exercised differently in different periods, and when the ability is exercised to a certain level, it is self-defeating! So I appreciate character more.

Character is better than ability, character shaping is difficult, it is cultivated from childhood, ability can be changed through learning, good character is not necessarily good, good character must be able to improve ability through learning, so if I am a leader, character is more important than anything else! The greater the ability, the greater the contribution, the greater the ability of the person with bad character, the greater the destructive power, the character is far more important than the ability, even if the person with no problem with the character is not capable, it will never be negative. It's just that the contribution value is low, and it won't be a hindrance to cause destruction.

People with bad character are more or less pulling their hind legs, and their destructive power depends on the size of their ability.

Character is definitely more important, if a person's ability is not good, it can be cultivated slowly, but if a person's character is not good, it will have a huge impact on the enterprise.

As a leader, ability and character, I value character more, because if the character is not good, no matter how strong the ability is, it is in vain.

As a leader, what should be more important should be character, how a person can be reused for the company, whether it is trustworthy, character is very important, and ability can be obtained by hard work in the later stage.

Both are very important, character is more important, people with good character can make their enterprises develop better, and can make enterprises more stable.

As a leader, I value character, although ability is also very important, but character is more important than ability.

As a leader, I believe that ability and character are just as important, and if I had to choose one or the other, I think character is more important.

Character, if there is a character that I don't have the ability to, I can slowly cultivate it, and I don't have to worry about making any unforgivable mistakes. Having the ability to have no character is a time bomb, maybe it will plant mines for you at any time, let you deal with the problem and blame you.

What I value more is character. If there is no problem with the person's character, through continuous efforts, he can also improve his ability. But if the character is not good, I will not reuse such employees.

As a leader and character, I pay more attention to the character of the employee, only if he has a good character, I will reuse him and trust him.

Character, we must first learn to be a person and learn to do things, if the character is not good, the ability is in vain.

What is more important is ability, if the ability is stronger, it can drive the value of the enterprise's income, and it can also improve the ****.

Therefore, in terms of ability and moral choice, the boss will prefer employees with moral values, and ask which company is willing to use them. This is also what leaders value the most!

As a leader, I think character should be more important, if you can't even do a good job, even if you have the ability, what's the use?

As a leader, ability and character are definitely more important. At the same time, character is also very important, if there is no ability. Only character, that's not good.

As a leader and character, I think we should pay more attention to character.

In work, character and ability are both important, and at work, I believe that being a person is as important as ability. If you have a good personality, but your work ability is poor, and the leading cadres will not appreciate it, it will be difficult for you to stay in this company. You are a very poor person, and although you have strong professional skills, you have a poor relationship with your colleagues and have a bad character.

It's hard to fit in with this big family of work. And so on. The relationship between you and your work partners needs to be very stiff, and the relationship with the leader will be very stiff, and it will be really difficult for you to solve some things, and no one will want to deal with you, so you will be isolated.

We all know that in the work, the person and the ability are equally important, as long as the relationship between the two is scientifically reasonable, correctly solved, you will achieve a full result, and you will have a lot of people in the company who respect your work ability, others will appreciate you. to better give full play to your personal value, I think this is a lifelong friend. After all, most of the time I work in the company, I actually have to pay attention to teamwork, and what I value more at this moment is actually my colleague, who is a person who can work efficiently and have the ability to work, and only by collaborating with such a person can I ensure that my work is effective, so that I can complete my work tasks on time and in quantity.

Therefore, I would rather meet a lot of colleagues in the company who are strong but not necessarily good, because this can make me more relaxed, and at the same time, it can also make it easier for me to collaborate. In fact, in the process of the enterprise, when you encounter colleagues with bad character, you usually don't touch them less, and you don't have private contacts with them, only some communication at work, and I don't think there will be any big problems. After all, it's not like I have to get along with my colleagues for a lifetime, even if his character is a little worse, it won't affect me too much, but if he is a person who is incapable of working, it will immediately be harmful to me, so I don't want to meet a colleague who is only a person and has no ability to work.