7D and Invincible Rabbit Problem! Prawns help solve it!

Upstairs talking nonsense. 7D is the goods that are likely to be eliminated in a few years. Sooner or later, non-full-frame APS-C such as 7D will be withdrawn from the stage of history.

Look at the cameras that are still being used to make money, whether it is a photo studio or a news reporter, aren't they all old 5D and old 1D? When is it obsolete? Outdated only X0D, X00D this APS-C camera.

In my opinion, the 7D is just an APS-C entertainment device launched by Canon to satisfy some consumers. Weak 5d2 performance? First time I heard about it.

Needless to say, the pros and cons of full-frame and APS-C in noise control alone. 7D Win Across the Round? I don't know which ** book you read it, have you tested it yourself?

Why do professional photographers who make money buy 5d2? When everyone else is stupid?

In general, 7D is a popular product, and 5D2 is a long-lasting hard commodity.

Aside from the fact that 7D and 5D2 have their own strengths and weaknesses in full-frame, it is a mistake for 7D to win across the board, including the all-important metering, focus, and high dynamic range, which are all important indicators for imaging.

Play for a few years must be on the full pair,This statement is not true,Now 5D2 performance is already very weak,Don't play for a few years,5D2 will be eliminated early,For you who are novices,I suggest 7D is more suitable for you,If you are entangled in the full pair,Then wait for 5D3 next year。

Upstairs talking nonsense, APS C will withdraw from the stage of history sooner or later? I remember 10 years ago, some people shouted that the whole people were in full gear, and now not only APS-C has not been eliminated, but the performance has been rising. Not to mention waiting for the Chinese to get rich and the like, the North American market cutter sells better than the full auxiliary machine is an example.

There is no doubt that 5D2 is better than 7D. But good image quality doesn't mean good performance, 5d2's weak focus has been criticized for a long time, and besides, how many years has 5d2 come out? It's time for a next-generation upgrade.

It's enough for the average player to play 7d, besides, as far as naming is concerned, 7d, the name of the number of digits, itself says something about the things that Canon will attach so much importance to? Is Canon a fool?

In general, the update rate of the fuselage is very fast, and the full set is of course better than APS C, but the more important thing to play with the camera is the lens, and it is better to spend money on the lens than to invest money in the fuselage that will be updated soon. If you don't have a bad money, a 5D2 bull head or a 5D3 bull head after a while will definitely be enough for you for a while, but if you don't have a bad money, a 7D bull head or even a 550D bull head is definitely enough for LZ.

Fortunately, the picture quality,Because the invincible rabbit is a full frame,60% larger than the 7D frame,But the image quality of the invincible rabbit is not better than 7D60%,In the case of sensitivity100,The image quality of the invincible rabbit and 7D is almost equivalent,Starting from the sensitivity200,7D began to appear noise,This is related to the high pixel density of 7D,From ISO400 the noise increases,But the high sensitivity 7D has become stronger again,ISO3200 is not lost to the invincible rabbit, And the high sensitivity of 7D only produces brightness noise, and does not damage the image quality, it can be easily removed by post-noise reduction and almost does not damage the image quality, 7D only has 40% of the image sensor of the invincible rabbit, but it can be close to the image quality and noise reduction ability of the invincible rabbit, 7D is indeed very powerful, in addition to the image quality, all the performance of 7D exceeds the invincible rabbit, especially the focusing system, 7D is extremely powerful, I have tested it is not slower than 1D4, in a very dim place, 7D can focus quickly, invincible rabbit and 60D can hardly focus, This is the power of the new focusing system, it is not easy to find in broad daylight, plus 7D other functions, that is to say, 7D is the top camera in C format, Invincible Rabbit is a simplified full-frame camera, Invincible Rabbit takes the high-quality route, 7D takes the high-speed route, and there is another point, although it is a C-format camera, only 40% of the area of the full frame, but it still has a strong advantage, that is, it can make the telephoto lens longer, such as 70-300, and the focal length is 70-300 on the Invincible Rabbit, Although it is possible to install a teleconverter, it will lose the first level of aperture and image quality, which is unacceptable for people who require high image quality, but 7D can increase 70-300 to 112-480, which is a huge boon for avid photography enthusiasts who like sports capture, because 7D has a strong focusing ability.

The image quality of the invincible rabbit is definitely stronger than 7D, even if the same lens is used, the sharpness of the invincible rabbit will be higher than that of 7D. Because the pixel density of the invincible rabbit is lower. Low pixel density requires less lens resolution.

In addition, the CMOS area of the invincible rabbit is nearly twice as large as that of 7D, so theoretically the noise will be lower and the dark details will be better. In fact, in the case of ISO200, the details of the invincible rabbit are indeed much better than those of 7D.

In addition to the image quality, no other project in 5D II exceeds 7D.

7D plus 16 35 is also a good choice.

Enough for travel.

Generally, the bellows are not pulled, and the annoying thing is that it is not focused at all, or it does not respond.

Not only is the focus point not as much as 7D, but the stage at night, except for the middle one, the other 8 points can be ignored.

I struggled with it once in 2009 and ended up choosing 7D, and then I also used 5D II, and I have no regrets.

The focus is not as good as 7D, but it is not bad. You don't mainly use the lens with the maximum aperture when shooting on stage, and the focusing speed is still okay.

My friend has both machines, and he likes 7D to shoot mainly racing. And then the good and bad shots can be on, and you have to do this.

It depends on the situation, if you are the main shot or have an interest in doing the main shot in the future, it is recommended to choose the invincible rabbit, the full-frame picture quality and color are not comparable to the truncated frame. It is also very convenient in the later stage. Only the full-frame image quality can kill the ordinary SLR in seconds and meet the requirements of consumers.

If you are shooting with you or just having fun as an amateur, then 7D is enough, and high-speed continuous shooting can get many moments that cannot be captured by the main shot, which fully reflects the value of follow-up. In addition, the cost is much less than that of the invincible rabbit.

Hehe, there is indeed this situation, only when the machine is good can you go to **.

It is recommended to be a full-frame machine,The most important point is that the bull head is basically for the full width of the service,7D itself performance is stronger than the invincible rabbit,But the matching head is troublesome,What bull head goes up after you have one,And waste edge imaging,Not happy。

But it's not cost-effective to buy the invincible rabbit at the moment.,Nikon is going to release the follow-up model of the D700.,It's best if you can change the door.,If you can't change the door, wait for Canon to go on the 5D III market.。

The camera is a talking booth for photography, and if you use it to occasionally shoot short films, it is okay, but if you shoot short films, it will damage the camera a lot. The image sensor of the camera is not designed for shooting short films, and the image sensor will be heated for a long time when shooting short films, which will shorten the service life.

Cameras aren't designed to shoot short films, so 7D and 5D2 don't have any advantages or disadvantages. It's like asking Maradona and Pele who plays table tennis well, it doesn't make any sense.

It's better to buy a DV to shoot a short film, and now you can shoot a DV, which is much more suitable than buying a camera.

In terms of image quality, 7D is not comparable to 5D2 in any case.

Shot on a 24x16mm sensor, Shot on a 36x24m sensor. The latter is much stronger in terms of image quality and shallow depth of field.

In addition, due to the large sensor area of 5D2, the area of a single photosensitive unit is also larger, and the photosensitive performance will also be improved by a grade.

Although the focusing performance of 5D2 is not as good as that of 7DBut if you're shooting a short film, go for 5d2.

After getting used to the 7D focusing speed, when you use 5DII again, you will have a heart attack due to the turtle speed of 5DII, so change to 5DIII.

7D is already very good, instead of endlessly burning money to buy equipment, it is better to calm down and study how to use the equipment in your hands, and always want to buy newer and better equipment.

5D2 highlights a full frame, and other feelings are not as good as 7D, so if you plan to enter the full frame, you will save money to 5D3.

I took an entry with 18-135: Please vote for a few votes from friends passing by, thank you.

Works of work. One IP, you can vote five times a day, thank you! If you don't like it, step on it, hehe!

oooo ↘┏oooo

Step) you die ) ).

I hope the above answers will be helpful to the landlord.

5D2 set 24-105

The 7D set 15-85 (actual focal length 24-136) and 5D2 belong to high-quality full-frame SLR cameras, and their image quality is second to none among SLR cameras, and the weakness is that the body performance is very low.

7D is a high-speed continuous shooting camera, and its focus tracking and continuous shooting performance are comparable to those of top-of-the-line cameras, but the weakness is that the image quality is not as delicate as 5D2.

No matter which one you buy from these two cameras, you can start with their set of machines, the sets of lenses they match have good performance, 5D2 sets of machines are more expensive than 7D sets, and the cost performance is not as good as 7D, although the image quality is not as good as 5D2, but it is not so bad, it is completely worthy of the more than 10,000 banknotes, but the body performance of 7D is much higher than that of 5D2, and the comprehensive cost performance is much higher7D. 5D2 and 7D are cameras of the same grade, one for the studio, the other for sports news, both cameras do not lose face when taken outside, and they are both civilian top cameras.

It is recommended not to go out of 7d.

d and invincible rabbit function complementary. Invincible rabbit power wide angle, 7D power telephoto, and 7D focusing, continuous shooting function is very strong, suitable for bird fighting.

2. When you go out to take pictures, you can carry both fuselages, and you can also use them as backups for each other to avoid problems. Bringing two cameras also reduces the hassle of changing lenses and avoids delaying the fighter. The two cameras may feel a little heavier, but if you love photography, you can overcome it, and it's all about exercising.

3. If you haven't bought a 7D yet, you may have to wonder whether you want to buy a 7D. However, it's already 7d, so don't worry about it, you can't sell it at a good price now. Besides, you bought 7D first, and then bought the invincible rabbit, and you feel that the conditions are better, and the money is not bad.