The executive grabbed the company s only coupon and was dismissed, what did she do wrong?

The executive of Donkey Mama grabbed a high-value coupon from his own company, and the executive was terminated while using it for his friend. On July 28, the reporter learned that in the case, the court of first instance confirmed that the donkey mother company terminated the labor relationship with Tang by contract, Tang appealed, and the court of second instance upheld the original judgment.

In October 2018, Donkey Mother Company launched the activity of "Yuan Spike 5,500 Yuan No Threshold Coupon", and the only one seckill coupon was snatched by Tang, an executive of Donkey Mama Company, and used by his friend Liu. In January 2019, Donkey Mother Company issued a termination letter to Tang, and Tang went to court with Donkey Mother Company. And the court of first instance held thatWhen Donkey Mother Company launched the only one spike coupon, Tang grabbed the coupon regardless of his identity as an insider, but in the end it was revealed that the actual user was not himself.

Although Tang claimed that he conveyed the coupon to others, he could not prove whether the other person paid consideration to Tang, and Tang's behavior could easily lead to a conflict of interest between the individual and the employer, and should be eliminated.

However, Tang appealed, saying that the company did not stipulate that employees were not allowed to participate in coupon grabbing activities, and he did not resell the company's coupons to others for profit, so it should not be determined that it violated the company's rules and regulations. But,Tang holds an executive position rather than an ordinary employee, and it is also his responsibility to maximize the company's interests, even if the company does not stipulate that employees cannot participate in the coupon grabbing activities, but Tang's participation in the coupon grabbing activities has conflicted with his identity.

At the same time, after Tang grabbed the coupons, even if he did not **, it also constituted a conflict of interest with the company, because the object of the coupon recipient's sense of profit was Tang, not the donkey mother company.

Therefore, the court of second instance still confirmed that the termination of Donkey Mother Company was legalThe status of the company's senior executives is special, which is different from the subordinate status of other ordinary employees. Executives are all in some way the voice of the company, and the rights and obligations are always reciprocal. While the salaries of senior executives are much higher than those of ordinary workers, they should also bear a higher standard of responsibility for the company and always maintain consistency with the company's interests.

She didn't do anything wrong, these activities of the company must be open to the public, and there is no clear rule that members of the company cannot participate, and the company's approach is also wrong.

Because the company's coupons are aimed at customers, not internal employees, she is violating the rules of the market as a company executive.

As a senior executive of the company, Tang's participation in the coupon grabbing activities also conflicted with his status as an executive, because the target of the company's concessions was potential market customers, not the company's employees.