Why teams with too strong point guards are often hopeless

Team basketball focuses on win-win cooperation, focusing only on one side of the nets losing the best team scoring opportunities. Because the time of controlling the ball is too long, it consumes the enthusiasm of running teammates, and in the end, they often attack by themselves and do not play team basketball, so they will lose.

A point guard, also known as a playmaker, is a fixed position in a basketball lineup. Point guards tend to be the playmakers of the team's offense and use their control of the ball to decide how to pass the ball to the right player at the right time. He is the one who has the most chances to get the ball on the court.

He has to take the ball safely from the back to the front court and pass it to other teammates so that he has a chance to score. A good point guard must be able to carry the ball across half court without any problem with only one person defending him. Then, he also has to be able to pass the ball well and be able to get the ball where it should be for most of the time

Sometimes it's a gap where you can shoot, sometimes it's a better position to guide the ball. Simply put, he wants the ball to flow smoothly, he needs to be able to get the ball where it's easiest to score. To take it a step further, he also needs to organize his team's offense and make his teammates' offense more fluid.

There is an old saying, those who win the inside line win the world, if the No. 1 position as the leading star will inevitably lead to a decline in the strength of the inside, of course, it is difficult to get a place in the playoffs.

There are no good defenders??? What do you think, the Spurs have Parker, Ginobili; The pistons have Billups; The Lakers have Fisher; The Celtics have Rondo! These aren't good point guards???

Paul has an injury this year, Kidd leads the Mavericks to the playoffs, and Nash leads the Suns to the playoffs!!

The Suns because they didn't defend, the Hornets because they didn't have a good interior line, and Kidd is now in the Mavericks, the Bulls. The Pistons are no longer a strong team, Lakers, Celtics. The Cavaliers, the Nuggets are because they have a whole bunch of All-Star players, a bunch of good benches and a good commander.

The key is that teammates are not good, the Magic did not have a championship back then, needless to say the configuration of the Bulls, the Spurs are too old and in the same area as the Lakers, although the Jazz style is iron-blooded, but the interior Oku and Boozer are still ......soft

It's a bit one-sided. For example, in Bierups, the key is the style of a point guard

What about Magic Johnson What about Bob Cousy It can only be said to be a coincidence Nash Paul Kidd didn't catch up with too good teams Needless to say about the Hornets The Suns are obviously a disabled team No matter how good the record is, it is not a championship The Nets and Mavericks in the past are good, but there is really no championship But this year's Mavericks are still good But there is really no precedent for building a dynasty around point guards There are fewer small forwards and more interior lines.

Who said it, Chauncey, Parker, Delon, and Rondo are all very good, and the team is not the same strong.

It's too lonely, and it's not a stadium with a defender.

Coincidentally, a good point guard needs a good scorer.

Note that teams with strong point guards such as Nash, Paul, and Kidd often don't have a consistent scorer, because teams with strong point guards such as Nash, Paul, and Kidd have higher salaries, and teams don't have enough salaries to hire consistent scorers. And the Bulls, Spurs, Pistons, Lakers, Celtics and other teams winning championships are always the top scorers in the team.

As long as the point guard is not alone, he should be fine.

The point guard is only used for naming, that is, ball control, passing, and organization, and now basketball has a tendency to develop towards all-round, so the general point guard must also have a strong scoring ability (since it is an organizational guard, he should pass the ball first and score second). Small front can be organized, scoring guards can control the ball, like Wei Shao and Rose are typical scoring guards as point guards (which means dual-energy positions, but I always feel that they are scoring guards), but according to the role of him is the organization guard, because he has to hold a lot of balls, passing is basically to break through the ball, and the organization is really average, but their shots are among the best in the whole team, so I personally think that if it is just according to the arrangement, there can be no point guard, but he is in control, he is distributing the ball, So he's a point guard.

If you don't have a point guard, you can't tie the team together, and it's hard for the team to play a tactical combination.

The control position is a commander on the battlefield!