Can it really be genetically modified to make ordinary people superhuman 20

Recently, the release of "Wolverine 3" has made people more and more interested in genetic modification. Some people in the movie have acquired abilities that are difficult for ordinary people to achieve due to genetic mutations. Some people have become copper-skinned and iron-skinned, or weak and boneless, or infinitely powerful, with superhuman strength.

In reality, for genetic modification, many of them are slowly becoming a reality, so let's take a look.

Broken bones are a wonderful way to ruin your entire day or months. Although bone is the hardest substance in the human body, it is not absolutely invincible. Unless you find out that you have a very rare mutation in the LRP5 gene.

The low-density liporeceptor protein LRP5 is a gene that determines the density of your bones, and mutations in this gene can make you born with nearly indestructible bones. A family member in Connecticut, USA, has a genetic mutation that gives them stronger, denser bones. In addition, these bones appear to be resistant to age-related wear and tear, known as various osteoporosis.

Hopefully, one day, a controlled form of mutated genes can be used to terminate bone disease.

The body has a gene that secretes myostatin, which controls muscle growth. Myostatin tells the body to stop producing muscle when it's enough, but defective genes prevent it from being produced. This means that muscle automatically grows to twice its average size, while fat deposits are halved.

Liam from Michigan

Hoekstra's gene was mutated, and due to the low protein content in his body, his muscles began to grow indefinitely. Babies with this symptom are born with well-developed muscles, and as they get older, they become much stronger than their peers.

When your toes hit the foot of the bed, your face is cut while shaving, etc., it can cause you a lot of pain. But there is a group of people in the world who are immune to pain because of the scn11a gene mutation in their bodies. This gene controls the formation of pain-sensing nerve channels through which sodium ions travel and create electrical nerve impulses that are sent to the brain, resulting in the perception of pain.

Overactivity of the SCN11A gene mutation avoids the accumulation of electrical charge, which nerve cells need to transmit an electrical impulse that numbs the body's perception of pain, and as a result, blocks the transmission of pain signals. However, their mutated genes are very rare and valuable, as they could be the key to revolutionary new pain drugs.

At least not at the moment, if there is, there will definitely be news about it.

No, you cannot. If people can be genetically modified, then wouldn't everyone in the world be superhuman? Is this possible?

Theoretically, it is possible, but the current technology should not be up to such a high level.

Superman? Or is it someone who is different from the average person? The definition of Superman is too broad, and it should be possible to transform into a person who is different from ordinary people, but it should not be transformed into a Superman like Ultraman.

The so-called superman is just that he has other functions than others, you do not lack superman on the earth, and some superman does have genes different from others, but it is not the only gene that determines the principle of superman.

No. It can only be aberration! However, there is a chance that you can be part of the strongest brain.

No, it doesn't. If so, the whole world is superhuman.

It depends on how you define Superman?

More than the average human?

Non-human? More than all humans?

See if you want to! If you think so, then you must be okay, anyway, you think like this, and no one else can help it, right, haha.

First of all, we should define what is "super", whether it is appearance or ability, let's think it is ability, for example, infinite strength, can fly in the air, but as far as I know, the gene should change a certain "trait" of a person, not ability, directly from changing the trait to the ability to change, there is still a certain distance, so my answer is yes, but it will take a long time, a few years, such as 5 years, 10 years, 20 years or 50 years or even longer.

Yes, it's just that our current level of technology and biology is not at that level, but with the development of the times, one day we will be able to become different through genetic modification.

There is no such technology yet, but it is impossible to say in the future, and the science will progress again, and we will grow.

It should be possible, but it may not be ideal. It's still difficult.

If you want to change the gene after a long period of accumulation of genetic time, you should study the system of Homo sapiens! Our genes are the genetic system inherited from the descendants of Homo sapiens + Heidelbergensis.

I think so, it's the evolution of the human population.

No, for the following reasons:

First, the essence of humans and robots is different, and humans can be defined from various levels such as biology, spirituality and culture, or a combination of these definitions. Biologically, humans are classified as hominoids, chromosome 2 and orangutan chromosome C centromere fusion (equilibrium translocation) association mode proximity of more than 16n, and multiple interarm inversions, the rest of the chromosomes have strong homology, is a higher animal. [1] On a spiritual level, man is described as being able to use the concept of a variety of souls that are believed to be associated with divine power or presence in religion.

In cultural anthropology, human beings are defined as beings who are capable of using language, have complex social organizations and technological developments, and are especially capable of building groups and institutions to support and assist each other. The definition of human beings in ancient China is: an animal that has historical classics and can use historical classics as a mirror for self-reflection.

Philosophical definition of man: man is a living organism that can record and consciously reproduce spiritual objects on his own. Among them, life is the self-reproduction of the cosmic law spiritual matter in reality; A spiritual object is a record of past events and things in reality.

Reality is the immediate spatial distribution of mass. The record is a transient change in the form of a new stack of the old; The repetition is a transient change in the form of the old starting the new. Both the recording and the reenactment are oriented along the "way of the universe", that is, they are both in accordance with the "three laws of the universe" to do a local cycle of "object recollection and detection, convergence and divorce", and the difference lies only in the difference in the transient state before and after the change.

A robot is a machine device that performs work automatically. It can be commanded by humans, run pre-programmed programs, and act according to a program of principles developed with artificial intelligence technology. Its task is to assist or replace human jobs, such as production, construction, or hazardous work.

Second, the simplistic composition of humans and robots is also different, people are living things, and robots are objects. The similarity is that both age over time.

This is the trend of the future, and I personally think it is possible.

It's incredible, that way to travel through the universe.

I think it's okay to have an idea.

Yes! Let's follow up on the principle of similarization!

The human genetic chain is relatively stable, and at present, it will definitely collapse if it is messed around.

It is unclear whether the technology of the future will be able to achieve it, and perhaps it will indeed be able to make genetic changes.

Maybe in the future, when technology is more developed, it can, but not at present.

Not now, but maybe in the future.

Human genetic modification technology has come true, super humans will be born, and scientist: Hawking's prediction has come true.

Isn't sperm donation a super human?

It is still the rule that enslaves the poor.

Of course not, for the following reasons (biologically):

The current mammalian transgenic technology is unstable, compared to the transformation into a supermanThe likelihood of causing cancer is much greater

Knocking out a gene is still 108,000 miles away from modifying humans, nothing matters.

Now everyone knows that the baby was rescued, but they don't know that it is just knocking out the gene of a CD receptor, which is not difficult, and any country can do it. It's another thing to transform humans, and we still doThe relationship and role of all genes in the genome are not knownIt is highly likely that one gene (e.g., the gene for strong muscle) is modified and other genes are ignored (e.g., the gene for a strong heart), and the person will pay a price (e.g., death) for a mismatch between the genes.

Genes not only transcrib RNA to synthesize proteins, but also regulate themThe control mechanism is still unclear(such as enhancers, promoters, terminators, transposons, etc.), is it said that it is changed?

may lead to the presentMost biotechnology, especially medicine, is ineffectiveand, most obviously, medicines. The baby is saved, all right, but with a lymphocyte receptor knocked out, who can guarantee that he will not become a susceptible to a disease? In case of other minor diseases, the drug site of action is the knockout of the receptor, and there is no medicine to treat.

aNew infectious diseasesIt only takes about 2 years, but a new drug takes at least 10 years to transform humanity, and as a result, a plague and death. That's not good.

There are many more that can be listed, but they can't be so negative, after all, they have saved people with unstable technology, which is commendable, and most countries condemn most of them because they are afraid that they will start and will be uncontrollable in the future, after all, there are many, many people who are ignorant (do not understand biology), and they may turn a good thing into a big bad thing. But in terms of human feelings,Is the modified child still your own? No.

The genes are not yours, and the paternity test says that they are not yours, how do you know if it is genetic modification or the old king next door?

I hope it will be helpful to you, and if you have any questions, you can continue to ask me.