When chasing a vehicle, is it feasible to hit directly from behind?

"American-style interception" is a common name, the real name of this interception is: PIT (preision immobilization tecnique) translated into Chinese: precision interception technology, is a kind of pursuit method used by American law enforcement agencies to force the suspect's vehicle to stop, so that it will no longer pose a threat or injury to vehicles and pedestrians on the road.

It is a very "new" thing for China, a country with a short history of automobiles and the sport of "racing" that most people are still very unfamiliar with. However, looking back, F1 has already held a sub-race in Shanghai, and this year is already in its 15th year. It has also cultivated a group of fans.

Originally, it was rumored that this year's F1 may not come to China, but in September last year, Jiushi signed a new three-year contract with F1, and the contract period of the Chinese Grand Prix ended in 2020. In addition, the F1 race will be broadcast live on CCTV, Five Star Sports and Tencent Sports. As F1's audience around the world continues to decline, and China may be a lifesaver for F1, F1 organizers still attach great importance to the Shanghai race.

But no matter what the business says, for fans they want to see a real race. As far as the race itself is concerned, the excitement of this year's Shanghai Station is believed to be worth the ticket price for all fans. In particular, after Toro Rosso driver Gasly collided with Hartley, the safety car was deployed, which added a lot of variables to the rest of the race.

Do you think Mr. Chao wants to talk to you about why they collided? In fact, this time, Mr. Chao wants to take advantage of this collision to talk to you about the vehicle interception. The collision between Verstappen and Wattle could not be considered a standard "American interception". A real American-style interception looks like this.

No, when driving, a careless car misses the ramp exit, at this time, some people have a fluke mentality, brake sharply and then forcibly change lanes, and even take the particularly dangerous behavior of reversing on the highway. There are many such car accident cases, because the front car does not operate in accordance with the regulations, resulting in the rear car not being able to brake or directly crashing into the tragedy. In such a situation, the driver of the rear vehicle is completely correct and <> to take the measure of braking without hitting the direction

In the event of a sudden situation on the highway, almost all the official guiding opinions of foreign countries are: no matter what object appears on the highway, you must not slam the direction, slam on the brakes and hit it directly, and then pull over and call the police. It's actually the same in our country.

Many friends should know the famous elk test, simulating the emergency steering ability of the car when encountering animals during driving, in this test the speed is limited to 80km per hour, no matter how fast the speed, no matter how advanced the car is also useless. Many experienced drivers will tell you that the most dangerous way to drive on the highway is to brake hard and slam the steering wheel. Because the vehicle is driving at high speed, the emergency steering will make the vehicle lose control, overturn, and cause the rear vehicle to have no time to avoid and cause a secondary accident, resulting in more serious consequences.

When the vehicle cannot avoid a collision, it is the most correct and cost-effective option to hit the vehicle directly. In the first case we mentioned earlier, the vehicle forcibly changes lanes and causes a collision of the vehicle, and the vehicle is fully responsible before the illegal lane change. Of course, if conditions permit, such as a straight and dry road, brake the vehicle as much as possible before crashing, at least to minimize the impact force.

When the speed is reduced to a controllable range and there is no oncoming traffic from behind, emergency steering measures can be taken. When driving on the road, the danger is often instantaneous, and in case of emergency, the right measures can be taken to minimize the damage, after all, life is the most precious.

Of course not, it will be a series of accidents.

No, such behavior is against traffic laws.

No, it's particularly dangerous.

This is not recommended, it can be forced to stop from the side, and it will be dangerous to hit the back.

No, this is a very dangerous way to drive.

No, because it's irrational.

In the plot of the movie, it can be like this, in real life, the police chase the vehicle, usually intercepting it from the front.

No, don't take chances.

When pursuing, you can hit him as much as you want if you want him to stop.

Summary. Hello, it is a pleasure to serve you <>

When a normal driving car is overtaken in the opposite direction, the rear car is responsible for the rear-end collision caused by the opposite vehicle, and the rear car bears full responsibility; If you just deal with traffic accidents there, it is not a violation, and if there is a traffic accident, before the traffic police go to the scene to deal with the accident, whoever moves the scene of the accident will bear full responsibility for the accident. Therefore, waiting in the traffic light waiting area to deal with a traffic accident is not a violation.

When a normal vehicle is overtaken in the opposite direction, it is rear-ended by the vehicle behind it.

Hello, it is a pleasure to serve you <>

When the normal driving car is overtaken in the opposite direction, the rear car is responsible for the responsibility, from a legal point of view: the rear car collides with the moving front car to form a rear-end collision accident, and the rear car bears full responsibility;If it's just a banquet where to deal with traffic accidents, it is not a violation, and if there is a traffic accident, before the traffic police go to the scene to deal with the accident, whoever moves the scene of the accident will be fully responsible for the accident. Therefore, waiting to deal with traffic accidents in the red and green rotten lights waiting area is not a violation.

Hello, I just wanted to ask, because this caused my car to be rear-ended by the rear car, and the traffic police have sentenced the full responsibility for overtaking.

Legal basis: Article 19 of the Measures for the External Management of Road Traffic Accidents stipulates that if a motor vehicle has a non-motor vehicle pedestrian and a traffic accident is clearly committed, if all parties to the accident have violated the law and sold the seal, the main role or secondary role shall be determined according to the size of their respective roles in the traffic accident.

In order to better help you answer, you can tell me your specific situation.

The other party has reported that the insurance company is solely responsible for the cost of repairing the car, but during this car repair period, he himself has no car to use and wants to rent a car.

Yes, you can.

This belongs to the transportation expenses, and you can ask the other party to pay for it.

There is also a that before the accident, my car was intact Chunheng, and now my car has caused a very serious accident car in this accidentYesterday, I called the other party, and the other party was unwilling to pay the car rental fee and depreciation fee proposed by us.

There is a depreciation fee.

If the other party refuses, you can apply to Suha, which is a legitimate right and interests.

Summary. Article 1208 of the Civil Code Where a motor vehicle is involved in a traffic accident and causes damage, it shall be liable for compensation in accordance with the Road Traffic Safety Law and the relevant provisions of this Law. Article 1213 of the Civil Code If a motor vehicle is involved in a traffic accident and the damage is the responsibility of the motor vehicle, the insurer underwriting the compulsory insurance of the motor vehicle shall first compensate within the limit of the liability of the compulsory insuranceFor the shortfall part, the insurer underwriting the commercial insurance of motor vehicles shall compensate in accordance with the provisions of the insurance contract; If it is still insufficient or has not taken out commercial insurance for motor vehicles, the infringer shall compensate for it.

When a normal vehicle is overtaken in the opposite direction, it is rear-ended by the vehicle behind it.

A car in normal motion. When overtaking in the opposite direction, it caused a rear-end collision with the rear car. I don't understand your description too well.

The oncoming lane overtakes the cavity and you should not have anything to do with the bush cover. Then you are a rear-end Wu Zhengbi accident. It's over with full responsibility for the rear-end collision.

Any other objections?

Rear-end collisions that occur in traffic accidents. If there is no special situation, the rear-end Nolu is fully responsible. After calling the police, the traffic police will issue a letter of responsibility for the accident. Then it is enough to hold the insurance company to compensate the other party's losses.

Article 1208 of the Civil Code Where a motor vehicle is involved in a traffic accident and causes damage, it shall be liable for compensation in accordance with the Road Traffic Safety Law and the relevant provisions of this Law. Article 1213 of the Civil Code If a motor vehicle is involved in a traffic accident and the damage is the responsibility of the motor vehicle, the insurer underwriting the compulsory insurance of the motor vehicle shall first compensate within the limit of the liability of the compulsory insuranceFor the shortfall part, the insurer underwriting the commercial insurance of motor vehicles shall compensate in accordance with the provisions of the regimental insurance contract; If it is still insufficient or has not taken out commercial insurance for landslides or motor vehicles, the infringer shall compensate for it.

When a normal vehicle is overtaken in the opposite direction, it is rear-ended by the vehicle behind it.

Hello dear, glad for your question oh <>

When a normal vehicle is overtaken in the opposite direction, it is rear-ended by the vehicle behind it. <> analyze <> from a legal point of view

After being forcibly overtaken, the vehicle in front belongs to the reed limbs that enter the lane normally, and the vehicle behind bears full responsibility for the accident. If a rear-end collision occurs when the vehicle behind forcibly overtakes and does not fully enter the lane, the vehicle in front is fully responsible. When forcibly overtaking the vehicle in front of you, reduce your speed, but be sure not to give way.

Because others forcibly change lanes, it is very dangerous to carry out emergency avoidance, if it is after the speed reduction, or rear-end collision, it is also the responsibility of the other party, but remember, the premise is that we slow down, otherwise the responsibility is ours. <>

Legal basis<>

Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the parties according to the role of the parties' actions in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault. (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, the party shall bear the responsibility for the uproar; (2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault; (3) None of the dust rolling parties is at fault for causing road traffic accidents, and if it is a traffic accident, all parties are not liable. If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

Summary. Hello, I am honored to answer the rear-end traffic accident for you The rear car collides with the moving front car in the rear-end traffic accident, and the rear car bears full responsibility; At night, the front car has no tail lights, and the rear-end traffic accident is formed, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident;

The rear car rear-ended the car in front, causing the car in front to deviate from the lane and then hit the person.

Dear Hello, I am honored to answer for you Rear-end traffic buried in the early accident The rear car collides with the moving front car to cause a rear-end disturbance traffic accident, and the rear car bears full responsibility; At night, the car in front of the bend has no tail lights, and the rear-end traffic accident is formed, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident;

After the front car stops on the road and fails to turn on the dangerous residual to take the alarm flashing lights and set up warning signs according to the provisions of the missing ride, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident; After the car in front stopped on the road, the car was destroyed according to the regulations, the hazard warning flashing lights were turned on and warning signs were set up, and the rear car assumed full responsibility for the accident.

In the rear-end traffic accident caused by the over-long car in front and the obvious warning signs are not set up in accordance with the regulations, the front car refers to the slippery mountain and bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident; In a rear-end traffic accident caused by the vehicle in front reversing or slipping into the vehicle behind the ant, the vehicle in front bears full responsibility for the accident.