Legalism and Confucianism are incompatible, how did Confucianism reconcile the two into a way to gov

Confucianism is to govern the country with etiquette, Legalism is to govern the country according to law, and Taoism is inclusive, believing that Confucianism can be used for personal self-cultivation, and Legalism can be used to govern the country and chaos, which can complement each other.

Adopting Confucianism and Legalism as Ideas for Governing the Country instead of Mohists and Taoism The Core Ideas of Confucianism Ideas on Governing the Country Ideas of Confucianism The Core Ideas of Legalism Legalists on Governing the Country Since 1 9 9 6, China began to vigorously advocate the "rule of law" at the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and established the basic governing strategy of "governing the country according to law and building a socialist country ruled by law," and later incorporated it into the "Constitution of the People's Republic of China" at the Second Session of the Ninth National People's Congress. The 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China once again put forward the need to take the rule of law as "the basic strategy for the party to lead the people in governing the country."

With 'benevolence' as the core of the doctrine and the dialectic of the mean as the ideological method, we should emphasize the blood and family ethics, reproduce the merits of the world, emphasize the practice of reason, and emphasize moral cultivation. In terms of the concept of heaven and Taoism, Confucianism preached "fear of the mandate of heaven and the words of the saints", and at the same time dealt with the worship of gods, putting the belief in the supernatural in a subordinate position to real people.

Confucianism emphasizes moderation and self-cultivation to govern the country and level the world, while Legalism uses law to restrain it.

Good at discovering and applying the strengths of others to make up for their own shortcomings, and integrate and communicate with each other

Confucianism strives to achieve this through the principles of objectivity, knowledge, and sincerity. Achieve self-cultivation, family, governance, and peace in the world.

Legalism and Confucianism are not the same, and Legalism and Confucianism are different.

How to say, one is Western medicine, and the other is Chinese medicine Chinese and Western medicine are combined, why can't the two be drunk and used together.

Each different Buddha has its own philosophy, and it is not something we can just guess.

Confucianism attaches great importance to etiquette and religion, and urges people with moral norms;

Legalists focus on the law and pay attention to severe punishment;

Taoism focuses on self-cultivation and is known for its non-action thinking.

Confucianism advocates "benevolence", loves gentlemen, is far from villains, is responsible to the people, and implements "benevolent government".

Legalism, advocating the "rule of law", is only responsible to the monarch, regardless of the limits of the people's tolerance.

Taoism advocates "rule by inaction", is not responsible for anyone, and advocates that "the voice of chickens and dogs does not interact with each other".

In the Western Han Dynasty, some insightful politicians chose the concept of "deposing a hundred schools of thought and respecting Confucianism". In the Northern Song Dynasty, the Confucian idea of governing the country reached its peak, and the saying "half of the treatise on language ruling the world" appeared.

Each has its own merits: Confucianism emphasizes the patriarchal theory of the Three Principles and Five Constants, Legalism emphasizes the rule of law, and Taoism tends to rule by inaction and recuperate. The three are not incompatible, but have different emphasis. Specifically, Taoism was used in the founding of the country, Confucianism was used in prosperous times, and Legalism was used in troubled times.

It is also applicable to national governance, for example, China's people's representative Da Lang Kai Hui embodies the people-oriented thinking, and our country also attaches great importance to the wheel of collecting opinions from the people.

I think it's a good fit. As the saying goes, water can carry a boat and sink a boat, and if you want to be able to govern the country, you must win the hearts and minds of the people.

I think this kind of thinking is also more suitable for national governance, and in modern society, of course, we must put people's interests first.

This statement is incisive! But it's not something that can be said in a few words. However, the following example can illustrate one aspect of this:

1. "Governing the heart with Buddha": Lack of desire and less demand, avoid insatiable greed;

2. "Governing the body with Taoism": cultivating the true nature, paying attention to health preservation, and maintaining good health.

3. "Governing the world with Confucianism": correctly handling the relationship between people and coordinating various social relations is conducive to building a harmonious society.

In the late Warring States period, Confucianism had developed into a great sect among the hundreds of princes, but it was not valued by the rulers. The reasons can be considered and analyzed objectively (mainly from the perspective of historical development trends and the development of productive forces) and subjective needs. Confucianism does not conform to the trend of social development.

At that time, the rise of princes and scholars, class relations had changed, and it was no longer appropriate to talk about the restoration of Zhou rites. Confucianism is not conducive to the struggle for hegemony in the world. Confucianism advocated "loving others" and "governing with virtue", which was not very attractive to princes who were obsessed with fighting for hegemony.

There are certain differences in theories depending on the era. Fundamentally speaking, the wheel is a Taoist advocate of wuwei, that is, the concept of going with the flow. In the sense, there is no essential difference between the existence of individuals and the existence of society whether it develops or not, so even if society does not develop, as long as there is no malignant situation, this view is not wrong.

Confucianism is about using rules to regulate people's behavior, which is not a law under power, but a kind of restriction on ideas, that is, governing the country by virtue. The main aspect of this view is the shaping of the idea that education plays a fundamental role in the system. This method of Confucianism is very good as long as it is not misinterpreted.

No matter what kind of proposition it is, as long as the main idea of the burning letter is good, even if there are loopholes, they can be slowly filled by time.

Taoism pays attention to the situation and guides the mountain, because when the trend of an era changes, you can only seize the opportunity to take your time. Confucianism, like Buddhism, should be the mainstay, knowing that it should not be done for the sake of the lack of the hall.