-
It is morally correct, but he jumped into the water when he could not swim, and in legal terms, he did not exercise his right to life and health correctly. This is contrary to the moral aspect. But he protected his life and health.
It is most correct not to care for the lives and health of others. It not only meets the requirements of social morality, but also protects their own life and health. It also cares for the lives and health of others.
Hehe, I'm done, it's not good, but I want these 5 points, Lian. For my sake, give eight, kiss.
-
First of all, from a legal point of view, there is no obligation to rescue the person who has fallen into the water, and there is no question of the crime of omission regardless of whether it is saved or not. At the moral level, B considers his own safety and does not directly go into the water to save people, which is understandable, but he just leaves without any rescue measures, and he does not think that it is a life struggling, too cold-blooded and numb, and he is very opposed. But A, his enthusiasm is good, it is worthy of praise, but he can't swim and jumps down, this approach is very stupid, he has not thought of other ways, if there is no timely call for help from C D, he is only afraid that his precious life will be wasted in vain.
On the other hand, CD called for help in time, rescued, took appropriate measures, calmed down and reasoned, and finally rescued the person who fell into the water.
-
Even if it's your best friend + hair little Lai Meilan is also!!
-
Your question itself contains a point of view that should be clarified first, and the evaluation criteria of law and morality are different.
This view, in an uncivilized society, is not civilized enough for the legislator to make moral laws.
The theory of connection expounds the relationship between law and morality: moral norms naturally originate from people's conscience, and in the process of people's transactions, people who abide by moral norms naturally uphold the civilization of the connection of justice. People according toMoral bottom lineThe establishment of laws that require everyone to comply with them, the coercion they have, the universal requirements of self-recognition and social identity of good people, and the basic relationship of equality for all.
In a civilized society, law and morality are the same, and the difference in standards is only a difference in quantitative hierarchy. For example, the crime of verbal abuse (subjective negligence) is immoral, but not illegal; Therefore, the crime of assault (subjective negligence) is immoral and illegal, but it does not necessarily constitute a crime (sentencing). When the injury reaches a certain degree (subjective negligence) crime, immorality, illegality, (sentencing) crime.
The legal evaluation of human behavior is based on moral evaluation, and moral evaluation generally adopts a moral paradigm of connection:
Doctrine principle: The essence of moral norms, which determines the subject's goal form, norms, and moral choices, that is, morality. Efficacy Criteria:
The by-laws of the Code of Ethics measure the values of the actions that are taken to achieve the goal, i.e., merit. Fame and fortune: The first moral view.
Recognize the value of realistic goals and ethical values. Honor and Disgrace: The second moral view.
Recognize the value of human goals and the choice of ethical means and means. Justice Expectations: Affirmation of ethical goals.
Moral hazard: There is a subjective factor that undermines justice and violates morality to grab goals. Civilized Pact:
An ethical contract in which the form and content of the subject matter and the transaction are conducted. Rights and Obligations: The point of the contract.
The agreement revolves around the specific actions of the current goal and the distribution of benefits after the goal is achieved. Common Order: The core rules of ethics that stipulate how people can trade together to determine their goals.
Self-Maintenance: Establish permanent goals, specific values. The individual spirit under the common order includes the display and maintenance of interests, character, dignity, reputation, and characteristics.
On this basis, the way of legal evaluator is reflected in the focus of the contract, that is, the agreement and performance of rights and obligations.
Criminal sentencing is embodied in qualitative sentencing: confirmation of subjective negligence, that is, the nature of the act, the quantitative criteria, and the results and impact of the act.
-
Which of the following statements about law and morality is true (b) a The natural law school holds that positive law is not law.
b Analytically positivist jurisprudence believes that law and morality are not necessarily related in naturec Ancient Confucianism believed that the country could only be governed by morality, and could not be governed by lawd Most modern jurists tend to deny the statement that "law is the minimum morality".
-
Correct answer: c
In jurisprudence, a violation of morality is not necessarily an illegal act, and an illegal act is not necessarily a violation of morality. Because in addition to some moral norms, there are also some technical provisions in the law, and it is not illegal to violate technical regulations.
-
c, the reason is on the same floor.
a, both law and morality have normative characteristics, b, law is mandatory by the state, and morality is more to be followed from human self-discipline, d, law is the minimum morality, so morality and law can be promoted.
-
Choose A and C. A was chosen because morality is not overtly normative, but rather conventional. I chose C because illegal acts are not necessarily moral, for example, "righteous killing of relatives" is something that does not violate morality in the eyes of people, but is illegal.
-
Choose A. There is no normativity in morality. Everything else is true.
-
Answer]: B Law is a code of conduct formulated or recognized by the state, which is mainly manifested in various enacted laws or case laws, with clear content, usually with words as a carrier, so that people can recognize and abide by them; Whereas, morality is a socially recognized and universally accepted norm of behavior, which can be either written or unwritten, and has no specific manifestation.
-
The statement about the law and the role of morality is incorrect ().
a.All have the role of regulating social behavior.
b.All have the role of regulating social relations.
c.All of them have the role of maintaining the prudent order of the social order.
d.Both have the effect of forced roll and sensitive constraints.
Correct answer: d
Never mind. Conforming to the law does not mean being ethical, and being ethical does not mean conforming to the law. However, most of them coincide. Morality is different for everyone and everywhere, there are no strict boundaries and standards, but the law is serious and must be there.
The main purpose of "Gift to My Brother" is to always maintain a strong and self-reliant personality like Songbai, so that he is worthy of being a person who stands up to the sky. "Gift to the Younger Brother" is a metaphor for pines and cypresses throughout the text, praising the pines and cypresses for being able to stand tall in the wind and not fall down, and not wither through severe cold. The poet gave this poem to his cousin in order to make his cousin stand like a pine, not afraid of the cold. >>>More
1.Adhere to the Party's centralized and unified leadership, adhere to the Party's scientific theories, maintain political stability, and ensure that the country always advances in the direction of socialism; >>>More
Law and morality are mutually reinforcing. Morality provides guidance to the law, and law is a manifestation of morality. However, there is a difference between the two, they are not the same in scope, breaking the law does not necessarily violate the moral bottom line, and if there is a problem with moral thinking, it does not necessarily violate the law.
I suggest you take a look at Montesquieu's "On the Spirit of Law", which mentions a problem: the reason why human beings want to make laws is because the establishment of human society makes the fear and cowering of human beings disappear in the primitive state, that is, the awakening of social forces and individual forces, which makes human beings have the motivation to attack and resist each other, which leads to wars between one society and another, disputes between one person and another, so that human beings make international law and laws between people (domestic law). And where does the most primitive law of human society come from? >>>More