Low sugar rice cookers that claim to be not fat are quite popular on e commerce platforms, what ar

This kind of rice cooker can not only reduce the sugar content, but also lose the nutrients in the rice, so it is not good for the body to eat。Major e-commerce platforms suddenly appeared a "hypoglycemic artifact" rice cooker, which is said to be able to separate most of the starch in the rice through the three steps of "dissolving, separating, and stewing", which has the effect of reducing sugar by 50%, and the steamed rice is also called low-sugar rice.

Nowadays, everyone is living a better life and paying more and more attention to health, many elderly people have high blood sugar, as soon as they heard that they can steam low-sugar rice, they were instantly attracted by this advertisement, and they couldn't help but want to buy one and try it at home. Especially for the elderly with diabetes at home, it is a more accurate prediction. This method is indeed very high-tech, the point is that can this low-sugar rice really lower blood sugar?

In fact, the business has completely changed the concept in this matter, if you want to really lower blood sugar, then eating this kind of low-sugar rice can't play much role, especially you can't use it directly to replace medicine.

However, there are some people who believe that it doesn't matter if it doesn't replace the drug, at least eating low-sugar against the body is also beneficial, in fact, this kind of rice cooker can indeed remove part of the starch, but at the same time, it also takes away some beneficial substances, and eating this low-sugar rice for a long time is not only not good for the body, but not good for the body. Some businesses have grasped the health psychology of consumers and began to consciously exaggerate the so-called hypoglycemic effect of products, which is actually suspected of false propaganda, and it is also an irresponsible inducement of consumption for consumers.

Don't listen to the advertisements, such an unscientific way is likely to cause nutritional imbalance in our body. After discovering this problem, the relevant departments have also stepped up their audits, just so that more people will not be deceived. In fact, when facing this new type of product, we should pay more attention not to blindly follow the trend to buy, let alone believe their so-called propaganda.

Although a low-sugar rice cooker can take away some of the sugar content in the rice, it can't be completely low-sugar rice, and it will also take away some beneficial substances, which is quite harmful to the human body.

Some of the hidden dangers that exist are:1The product quality is not good, and there are problems of sticking to the pot, sticking to the pot, and leaking; 2.The taste of the cooked rice is not necessarily good, there is the problem of rice sandwiching, and there is also the problem of undercooked rice.

Because these rice cookers filter a lot of nutrients, and in this way, people's nutrient intake will be insufficient, and there is a risk of malnutrition.

1. A low-sugar rice cooker just reduces the sugar content of rice!

The Guangdong Consumer Council conducted sampling tests on a variety of low-sugar rice cookers on the market, and the test results found that the sugar content of the rice cooked in these low-sugar rice cookers was indeed somewhat lower than that of ordinary rice cookers. However, the Guangdong Consumer Council also emphasized that this kind of low-sugar rice cooker can only reduce the sugar content of rice, and it is two concepts for lowering blood sugar. Therefore, the so-called low-sugar rice cooker only lowers the sugar content of rice, not lowers blood sugar!

Second, the rice cooked in the desugared rice cooker is slightly hard, causing the illusion of index delay!

As soon as this "black technology" is on the market, it will be more powerful, and even more powerful than low-sugar rice cookers is the desugared rice cooker. The advertisement of this desugared rice cooker is even more outrageous, saying that it can reduce the sugar content of rice by 70 percent. After that, the Beijing Institute of Nutrition Source tested this Internet celebrity desugared rice cooker, and the test found that after eating the rice steamed in the desugared rice cooker, the reason why the sugar content lagged behind was mainly because the rice made by the desugared rice cooker was harder, so it was digested and absorbed by the human body more slowly, which would cause a misleading situation to everyone.

The Beijing Institute of Nutrition Source also emphasized that this desugared rice cooker did not have the effect of desugaring rice, and the 70% reduction in sugar content in rice emphasized in the advertisement has no basis at all!

Therefore, whether it is a sugar-free rice cooker or a low-sugar rice cooker, the real role is to reduce the sugar content in the rice at most, but this cannot be equated with lowering blood sugar or even weight loss. Therefore, as a consumer, when buying goods, you should still keep your eyes open and avoid being misled by the merchant's exaggerated false publicity!

It's an IQ tax. Rice itself is a food with extremely high starch content, and starch is a sugary substance, and as long as the rice is still in the pot, the sugary substances have not been removed. Sugar control and ** are inseparable from six words: keep your mouth shut and open your legs.

IQ tax. Because rice cookers can't degrade the sugar in food at all, everyone must be rational.

An IQ tax, of course. Traditional treatment still has to go to the hospital, don't trust any products.

It's an IQ tax. Since a rice cooker can only cook food, can it still absorb all the sugar from the cooked food? So if you suck it in, it can suck it up? It's.

It must be an IQ tax, if there is such a low-sugar rice cooker, then why do scientists still develop hypoglycemic drugs, and why do doctors keep saying that diabetics should eat less rice.

I think the person who bought this rice cooker is also a talent, but anyone with a little common sense will not believe in the existence of this rice cooker. Why don't you go to the gym and get a card to exercise well to pay this kind of IQ tax?

I think this is black technology, and this kind of rice cooker is still a very good thing for diabetics.

I think it's completely an IQ tax, and now some unscrupulous businesses are changing their ways to deceive people, lose weight, and lower blood sugar How can it be achieved by relying on a small household appliance with science and technology, all of which are to catch people's consumer psychology in order to become popular on the Internet.

I think this is an IQ tax, because there is no technology that proves that it can effectively ** disease from the perspective of science and technology, and in addition, it requires young people to remind the elderly more to prevent being deceived.

I think it's very likely that these things are black technology, because it's probably not going to play a fundamental role.