What are the methods of argumentation and what are their functions, and what are the methods of argu

Argumentation methods include factual argumentation, truth argumentation, comparative argument, metaphorical argument, causal argument, citation argument, and theoretical argument.

3. Arguments of positive and negative: right and wrong are clear, right and wrong are clear, and they are impressive, making the argument more powerful or attractive.

4. Figurative argumentation: the truth is easy to understand, the language is vivid and vivid, and it is easy to be accepted.

5. Cite arguments: Quote famous sayings or quote some ordinary people's statements to make them more authoritative and popular, and make the argument powerful.

6. Causal argument: let people figure out the cause and effect of things, and the ins and outs.

7. Theoretical argumentation: The purpose is to prove that the argument is universal and regular.

Argumentation method: Make your own point of view have a way to substantiate.

What are the different methods of argumentation?

It reads as follows:

1. Argument by example: Demonstrate by giving specific examples, so as to make the argument more concrete and convincing.

Answer format: The argumentation method of example argument is used, and the ...... is given(summary example) proves ......(If there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise the central argument) so that the argument is more concrete and persuasive.

2. Reasoning argumentation: prove the argument by reasoning, so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Format of answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Note: If you cite famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.

Answer format: The argumentation method of citing arguments is used, by citing ......Proof ......points of view to make the argument more convincing. (Or more interesting to entice the reader to read on.) ）

3. Comparative argumentation. The role is to highlight.

Format of Answer: The argumentation method of contrastive argumentation is used, which will be ......and ......The comparison highlights the ......point of view.

4. Figurative argumentation: The truth can be explained in an easy-to-understand and easily accepted manner. Make the content of the argument more vivid and vivid, and more conducive to the reader's understanding.

Answer format: The argumentation method of figurative argument is used, which will be ......Likened to ......, proving ......so as to expound the abstract and esoteric truth vividly and vividly, and it is easy to understand.

(1) Argument with examples: more convincing. Strong arguments.

2) Reasoning argumentation: more authoritative, more convincing, and powerful argumentation.

3) Metaphorical argumentation: use facts to make the argument easy to understand, vivid and easy to accept.

1.Factual argumentation: Use true, reliable, and representative examples to prove an argument. Function: Concretely and forcefully prove the central thesis, enhance the persuasiveness, interest, and authority of the article, and make the article easy to understand.

2.Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments and prove the argument in the comparison. Function: Highlights the argument and makes people impressed.

4.Cite Arguments: Cite famous quotes, aphorisms, authoritative data, celebrity anecdotes, jokes, and anecdotes to argue. Function: Quoting celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers.

1.how the argument is presented;

2.how the argument is proven (what truths and facts are used, whether there are pros and cons of the analysis);

3.Relate to the structure of the full text, whether there is a summary.

Discussion, also known as reasoning, is a style of analyzing things, discussing facts, expressing opinions, and putting forward propositions. The author ascertains whether his views are correct or wrong and establishes or denies certain propositions by presenting facts, reasoning, and distinguishing between right and wrong. The proposal should have clear views, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments, and strict logic.

The method and function of argumentation is to demonstrate by example.

Arguments are made more concrete and convincing through typical examples, and arguments are proved in a reasonable way to make the arguments more generalized and deeper.

An argument is a method by which the writer is able to prove an argument with arguments. The deduction from argument to thesis in proof is carried out through the form of reasoning, sometimes a series of reasoning methods. Therefore, the argument must adhere to the rules of reasoning.