If the Chinese translation is good, I ll chase 50 points in a hurry

Categories: Education, Science, >> Learning Aid.

Problem description: It is in Wang Fuzhi's "Reading through the Commentary".

1.Summoning Jibu with the luck of one person, and sending Jibu with the destruction of one person, the world will peek at its shallowness. Although, what is the disease?

2.If it is gradually evil, it is still lighter than the summoning cloth and ashamed of its undreaming of knowing people.

Analysis: 1. Chunling summoned Ji Bu because of a person's praise, and sent Ji Bu because of a person's slander, and the people of the world will know the depth of this person. Still, what's the downside?

2. If he goes down the wrong path, he will degrade himself for his rash use of Jibu and be ashamed of his inability to know the nature of a man.

Heng: Often.

But they do not hear: but no one hears it.

Original text: Zi Yu asked, "Is it beneficial to say more?" Mozi said: "Shrimps, toads, frogs and flies, constantly chirping day and night, with a dry mouth and tongue, but they don't listen." Looking at the morning chickens today, the night crows, and the world vibrates. What's the point of saying more? Only when he said it. ”

Note: Excerpt from Mozi.

子間 (qin): A person's name, a student of Mozi.

Benefit: Useful. Heng: Often.

(p!).): Tong "敝", meaning tired.

But they do not hear: but no one hears it.

Singing at night: time, the right time. Cry at dawn.

What is the benefit of talking more: What are the benefits of talking more?

Translation: Zi Yu asked the teacher for advice, "Is it good to talk more?"

Mozi replied, "The shrimp and the toad and the frog keep screaming day and night, and their mouths are dry and tired, but no one listens to them. Behold the rooster, crowing at the right time at dawn, and the whole world shook, and the people got up early.

What are the benefits of talking more? It's important to say it at the right time. ”

Truth: Talking is not about how much, but about the right time and grasping the key.

1.The first to raise the troops: just care.

2.but deceived by the sons and daughters: unexpectedly.

3.In the tenth year of the Han Dynasty, Chen Xuanguo was reversed. The upper self will go, and the belief will not follow.

In the tenth year of the Han Dynasty, Chen Feng really rebelled. The emperor personally led his troops to quell the rebellion, but Han Xin said that he was ill and did not follow the expedition.

1. It is a guiding word, mostly used for assumptions, and the same usage as "if" and "rufu", which can be translated as if, once meaning.

2, but 3, in the tenth year of the Han Dynasty, Chen Feng really rebelled. Liu Bang personally went to quell the chaos, but Han Trust was ill and couldn't go.

1 and 2 here are personal opinions, which may be different from current teaching.

The first in 1 is interpreted as just in spite of it, and there is a smell of persuasion. The nai in 2 is used in ancient texts to connect the upper and lower sentences, and it is a kind of conjunction. In ancient times, it did not have a certain significance, but in modern times, in order to distinguish the relationship between contexts, it is deliberately explained.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary, and the judgment of this relationship can be judged from the semantic relationship of the sentence.