When a person dies at a banquet in the village, what responsibilities does the host family need to b

When you are catering in the countryside, if someone dies because of drinking, let alone drink too much and drink too little. But as long as someone dies, the main family has to bear a certain amount of responsibility, but the proportion of responsibility varies from situation to situation. For example, this person did not drink much at the table, and during the whole process, the host and his table mates did not persuade him to drink.

Purely because of the person's personal physical reasons, he died of discomfort after drinking. Then the moderator and the table mates should share the responsibility. If, in the process of drinking, the host persuades him to drink many times out of hospitality, resulting in his death from drinking too much, then the host is primarily responsible and the others are secondarily responsible.

If the host does not persuade him to drink, but the people at the table die because they drink too much, then the host should bear the secondary responsibility, and the people at the table should share the primary responsibility. Liability here generally refers to financial compensation, and the exact amount varies from place to place.

1.During the whole process, if there is no persuasion, the host family and the table mate share the responsibility.

The drinking atmosphere is different in every place. In some rural areas, people do not persuade each other to drink at banquets, and the amount of alcohol is up to the individual. In this case, if someone dies suddenly after drinking due to their own health reasons.

Although the host family and the table are not directly responsible, the host family and the table share all the responsibilities.

2.If the host's family advises the drinker, the host's family is the main responsibility.

At the village banquet, the host often thinks that he can persuade the guests to drink two more glasses to represent his enthusiasm. However, if someone drinks too much, they eventually die due to the repeated persuasion of the master's family throughout the process. Ultimately, the host family bears the primary responsibility, while the rest of the people at the table must also take secondary responsibility because they don't take care of the person.

3.If the person at the same table advises him to drink and causes death, the host family bears secondary responsibility.

The core point of the opinions on the handling of such matters in China's current laws is that whoever advises alcohol is more responsible. After all, someone died because of your persuasion. So if the people at the same table jointly persuade the people to drink and cause the death of someone, the people at the same table bear the primary responsibility, and the host family does not take care of them, they bear the secondary responsibility.

Of course, it is compensation and help to deal with the aftermath and explain the matter openly, which is what needs to be done.

If the host does not advise the drinker, and the one at the same table persuades the drinker, then the host has the secondary responsibility and the main responsibility of the same table to drink. If the host persuades him to drink, it is the main responsibility of the lord. The main family needs compensation anyway.

If the host family did not dissuade the person, causing the person to get drunk and eventually die of alcohol poisoning, then the host family is jointly and severally liable because he did not dissuade, he did not stop, and he did not fulfill his duty to take care of the guests.

The host family is not responsible, because when the host invites these people, they do not know that these people have some diseases, and these people know that they are sick and do not refrain from drinking, so they can only let themselves take responsibility.

Be responsible, because now the law clearly stipulates that if someone advises to drink and causes death, then the person who advised the alcohol will also be jointly and severally liable.

It is necessary to be responsible, because the person concerned died in the context of his own affairs, so the main family also needs to bear the amount of compensation.

When a banquet is held in a rural area, if a person dies because of drinking, not to mention how much he drank or how little. But as long as someone dies, then the main family must bear a certain responsibility, but because the specific situation is different, the proportion of responsibility is different. For example, this person did not drink much at the table, and during the whole process, the host and the people at the table did not persuade him to drink, purely because of the person's personal physical reasons, he was uncomfortable after drinking and died.

Then the host and the people at the table should share the responsibility. If in the middle of drinking,If the host repeatedly persuades the person to drink alcohol out of hospitality, and the person dies after drinking too much, then the host family bears the primary responsibility, and the others are secondarily responsible. If the host does not persuade him to drink, but everyone at the table dies because he is persuaded to drink too much, then the host bears secondary responsibility, and the people at the table share the primary responsibility.

Here, the liability generally refers to financial compensation, and the specific amount varies from place to place.

1. If no one advises the whole process, the host will share the responsibility with the table

The drinking atmosphere is different in each place, and in some rural areas, everyone does not advise each other to drink when eating at a banquet, and the specific amount of alcohol depends on the individual. In this case, if a person dies suddenly after drinking alcohol due to their own physical reasons. Although there is no direct responsibility with the host family and the table mates, the host family and the people at the table share all the responsibilities.

2. If the host family persuades the host, the host is the main responsibility

In the village banquet, the host often thinks that he can persuade the guests to drink two more glasses, which represents his enthusiasm. But if the host family has repeatedly advised them to drink alcohol throughout the process, causing someone to drink too much and eventually die. In the end, the main family bears the primary responsibility, and the other people at the table must also bear the secondary responsibility because they did not take care of the person.

3. If the person at the same table persuades the person to drink and causes death, the host family bears secondary responsibility

The core point of the opinions on the handling of such matters in China's current law is that whoever advises alcohol is more responsible. After all, someone's death was caused by your act of persuasion. Therefore, if the people at the table jointly persuade someone to drink and cause someone to die, the person at the same table is primarily responsible, and the host family does not play a role in taking care of the obstruction, and also bears secondary responsibility.

It will definitely be compensated, and it will also bear 100% responsibility, it is in this place that he died, and he will also give the other party some burial expenses.

If someone drinks to death at a banquet in the village, the host should be responsible for this situation, and then the person who drinks with him should also bear part of the responsibility.

The owner has a certain responsibility, and if he fails to do a good job of supervision, he needs to make compensation.

Usually everyone drinks alcohol during gatherings or banquets, so if some people die due to drinking at the banquet table in the countryside, will the host be responsible at this time?

If the person dies as a result of drinking at a feast, the host family must be held responsible. Because he did the feast, he had to take his own responsibility and his responsibility for it. Therefore, if this situation occurs, the host must carry out compensation, but the actual amount of compensation is determined according to some specific local circumstances.

In the event that a negotiable situation arises, we can deal with it through laws and regulations.

It's not just the host who has to be responsible, and at the same time with the person, but the person who drinks is also responsible. Even if these people don't show the personal act of toasting, they will still be responsible for it. In recent years, there have been news reports on the Internet about people dying due to drinking.

It is not difficult to see that you should also control the size when drinking. I said that if you feel that your body is abnormal, you should never drink alcohol, because alcohol is likely to cause many diseases. After drinking, others have to be responsible for sending the drunk person home, otherwise, when some accidents occur, these people will have to bear it.

This would have been a happy event, but because of this incident, we felt very sad. Therefore, when you are outside, you should reduce the frequency of drinking as much as possible. Regular drinking is likely to continue to cause harm to their internal organs, and over time, it will continue to cause hepatitis, cirrhosis and ascites.

At the same time, after drinking too much, it also damages their central nervous system very much. You will find that many people will become more and more irritable after drinking, and they may also have a particularly unstable state of mind, and drinking alcohol will continue to cause some damage to their skin.

I don't think there's a need to lose money, after all, my drinking behavior is caused by my own inability to control it, so I'll let someone else compensate tomorrow.

Encountering these things is relatively troublesome, and in general, it is indeed caused by the subjective error of the owner, and it is necessary to compensate.

It is better to choose to deal with it through legal means, which is also fairer and does not need to be held liable if the deceased person is already an adult.

If this kind of thing happens in the countryside, most people (including me) will think that the owner should not be responsible, but this is not the case. In the countryside, there are often all kinds of banquets, and there are many alcoholic people at the banquet, who like to drink with others at the banquet, and often get drunk and rest. Therefore, in the countryside, it is also easy for some people to drink and die at the banquet, making the host very passive.

As described in the puzzle, the drinker came on his own, and the host did not invite him, so the host would feel that he was framed. Frankly speaking, if it were me, I would also feel very framed, but the framed does not mean that the host's family is not responsible, after all, people are going to die in the wine shop you run.

According to the previous cases of drinking and drinking deaths, if it is in a hotel or restaurant, if the whole table does not persuade the drinker to drink less, then the legal liability is generally shared with the average value of the same table. However, because this banquet is to be held in the countryside, in addition to the people who drink with him at the table, there are also the host's family, so there are generally the following types of possibilities:

Since drinking alcohol is indeed carried out by the host, if someone dies of drinking, in addition to the responsibility of the person who drinks at the same table, the host's family should also be responsible. First, the host and the people at the table bear the same responsibility; Second, the host bears the primary responsibility, and the person at the table bears the secondary responsibility; Third, the host bears secondary responsibility, and the person at the table bears the primary responsibility.

Once the worst outcome occurs, how to deal with this liability and payout dilemma? First of all, let's talk about which situation the host has no responsibility at all. If this person is not invited, he will take the initiative to attend the wedding banquet, and no one will toast at the wine table.

In this case, if the illness occurs, the host family will send the patient to the hospital in time, so if there is also a death, then the family is also a great favor, and should not freeze other people's assets, nor should the owner be held responsible. However, if the other people in this family are more loyal, they can pay some money to show their condolences.

When a person dies of drinking in the village, the host has a certain responsibility, and the specific situation still needs to be determined.

This situation is indeed prone to the death of drunken people. Once the dead person is gone, neither the organizer nor the tablemates can escape. are all liable for compensation.

There is a need to bear part of the responsibility, and if it is a death while eating, there is a high probability that compensation will be required in this case.

This person should be taken to court immediately, so that the court can decide whether the main family should pay money.

This can be dealt with by the police, and see what the reason for the death is, if you have a disease, you don't need to compensate.

It is better to go through the judicial process for this kind of thing, and from the relevant cases in the past few years, the people who drink at the same table are responsible, and the specific responsibility has to be decided by the court.

Summary. Dear, I'm glad to answer for you, treat at home, ask the helper to drink and die, the host is responsible, according to the general principles of the civil law, tort liability law and other legal provisions, after drinking, one of them dies, in most cases the drinker should bear his own losses. If the person who drinks with him does not have the above circumstances and has exercised a reasonable duty of care, he or she may share part of the responsibility in accordance with the principle of equity.

If you have a treat at home, and the person you ask to help drinks and dies, is the main family responsible?

Dear, I'm glad to answer for you, treat at home, ask the helper to drink and die, the host is responsible, according to the general principles of the civil law, tort liability law and other legal provisions, after drinking, one of them dies, in most cases the drinker should bear his own losses. If the person who drinks with him does not have the above circumstances and has exercised a reasonable duty of care, he or she may share part of the responsibility in accordance with the principle of equity.

Responsibility has a rich connotation. It can be distinguished from different levels and different forms, and can be understood from different fields and different angles. Responsibility is everywhere and exists in every post of life.

Parents raise their children, children respect their parents, teachers teach and educate people, students respect teachers and are eager to learn, doctors save lives and help the wounded, and soldiers protect their families and defend the country. To survive in society, people must inevitably assume and fulfill certain responsibilities for themselves, their families, the collective, and the motherland.

Summary. Hello, at home, the person who asked for help drank and died, if the host has fulfilled the safety and security obligations, then there is generally no responsibility.

If you have a treat at home, and the person you ask to help drinks and dies, is the main family responsible?

Hello, at home, the person who asked for help drank and died, if the host has fulfilled the safety and security obligations, then there is generally no responsibility.

The situation you described is an employment relationship in which the employer is liable for compensation for personal injury suffered by the employee in the course of employment. Obviously, in this case, the employee died by drinking alcohol, and if the owner has fulfilled his duty of safety, then he personally thinks that he needs to bear the responsibility for the safety and security of the family.

Of course, the specific situation should be determined according to the actual collapse of the incident, and after the analysis and judgment of the first pin. According to Article 35 of the Tort Liability Law, if a labor relationship is formed between individuals, and the party providing the service causes damage to others due to the service, the party receiving the service shall bear the tort liability. If the party providing the service suffers damage due to the service, Tuanhui shall bear the corresponding liability according to the fault of both parties.