The uncle died suddenly after the guy slapped him 4 times because he didn t give up his seat, and hi

The incident happened on a bus in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, an old man suddenly fell to the ground unconscious, although the ambulance arrived at the scene in the shortest time, after 50 minutes of rescue Uncle was still not rescued. Afterwards, the reporter interviewed the passengers on the bus about the sudden death of the uncle, and it turned out that the old man asked a young man to give up his seat as soon as he got on the bus, but the young man did not do what he wanted, and when everyone did not react, the uncle directly raised his hand and slapped the young man four times, and the anger led to sudden death.

The uncle died suddenly after slapping 4 times because the guy didn't give up his seat.

On a bus in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, an old man and a young man had an argument, and the cause was the problem of not giving up his seat. When the bus drove near Zhongyuan Road, an elderly man stepped onto the bus through the front door, skillfully swiped the "senior card", and then walked to the carriage. But at that time, the car was full of passengers, only the two rows of seats at the back of the car were still vacant, and the old man was reluctant to sit in the back, so he came to the young man by the window, patted the young man's shoulder and said:

Give me a seat, young man. ”

Xiao Zhao, who was sitting in the seat, had just finished a day's work, and was leaning on the window to close his eyes and rest, when he saw an uncle next to him wake him up, and was just about to give up his seat, but saw that there was still a seat behind him. And when the old man saw the young man's attitude, he made up a scene where others disrespected him, and his face immediately became ugly, so he pointed at the young man and scolded. The guy adheres to the attitude that more things are better than less, and he doesn't want to break with the old man, but the old man doesn't think so, and he raises his hand and slaps the guy.

This slap woke Xiao Zhao up, and the young man with strong blood was just about to fight back, but when he saw the old man's gray hair, he suppressed his heart to fight back. But Xiao Zhao didn't fight back, it didn't mean that the old man was willing to give up, and then the old man slapped Xiao Zhao three times, a total of 4 slaps. The passengers on the side couldn't stand it anymore and hurriedly dissuaded the old man.

When the driver learned about it, he also stopped the bus and let the two get off the bus. But the subsequent plot was beyond everyone's imagination.

Unexpectedly, the old man who started to hit people first fell to the ground and convulsed because he was too excited after getting out of the car. When the driver noticed that something was wrong, he immediately stepped forward to ask the old man how he was, but the old man did not respond. Seeing that the situation was not right, the driver immediately called the police**, and by the time ** arrived, the old man had lost his breath.

Epilogue. The young man was sued by the family of the old man, and the family of the old man believed that the young man did not respect the old and loved the young, which would lead to the sudden death of his old father in the car. The family of the old man claimed that when the doctor examined the old man's whole body, he also found that there were blood stains on the old man's mouth and nose, and they suspected that the young man had beaten the old man, so they kept suing the young man in court and claimed 500,000 yuan in compensation from the other party.

Answer: I don't think it makes sense for this old man to slap others at every turn, and that the refusal to give up his seat is just a matter of one's conduct, and besides, the man is too sleepy when he just returns from work. I think that the sudden death of the old man by slapping someone is purely self-reaping, it is simply that the wicked person sued first, and there is no basis in the law, and the man in this case did not fight back, but just let the beater vent his anger.

It is immoral for people not to give up their seats, but it is rude and arrogant for the old man to beat people at every turn, and it is even more ridiculous to find someone to pay money for sudden death.

I think it's everyone's freedom not to give up their seats, and it's not right for the uncle to beat people, you can't do it because others don't give up their seats, I think the family's claim of 500,000 yuan is less, how can a life be worth only 500,000.

Personally, I think the family claims 500,000 yuan, which is very unreasonable, the guy doesn't give up his seat, this is the quality of the guy, but the uncle beat someone and then died suddenly, this is the uncle's physical problem.

This family member is very unreasonable, although the uncle has passed away, but the uncle's approach is wrong, and the uncle's death has nothing to do with the young man.

This is particularly incorrect, and I feel that when I meet such a person, I feel that I really have no quality, and I can call the police directly if I am not polite.

It's not that the old people have become bad, it's that the bad people who had bad qualities themselves have become old. Giving up your seat is morality, and who says that not giving up your seat is low morality?

The uncle was indecent to the girl, because he did not comply, he died of anger after being rejected, and claimed millions!

The bad guy is old, and there is reason to beat people, and it is intolerable for him to win.

If you sit in the seat of love (old, weak, sick, disabled, pregnant), you should take the initiative to give up. Unless you are sick yourself.

You can't give up your seat to the bad guys.

You should say: Yuan Fang, what do you think?

This is an accident, and the lad is not responsible.

Accident refers to an act that objectively causes damage, but is not caused by the intention or negligence of the 1653 actor, but due to unforeseeable reasons.

The young man would certainly not have foreseen that simply not allowing him to do it would lead to the death of the old man (as a normal person, it is impossible to foresee this), and the young man did not have the intention or negligence to cause the death of the old man.

It is not a criminal case, and no criminal offence has been found according to the description. Refusing to give up your seat is not a violation of the law, there is no legal fault, and civil liability is not borne.

There is no responsibility, and if the seat is not a seat for the elderly, young, sick, disabled, or pregnant, there is no need for moral accountability.

With a large number of ** elderly people on the Internet forcing young people to give up their seats, we can often see it! Since ancient times, respect and love for children have been the traditional virtues of the Chinese. I remember Mencius famously saying:

I am old, I am young, I am young, I am young. It can be seen from this that respecting the old and loving the young is a virtue of the Chinese nation. For an elderly person, we should have shown respect for him, but for office workers, it is also difficult for them to enjoy their rights one day.

I don't really know what to say to the old people who were forced to give up their seats. But if we don't do anything, we don't see such behavior, and similar incidents are endless.

Once, on a bus in Zhengzhou, an elderly man and a young man got into an argument over a seat, which led to an increase in blood pressure and sudden death from a heart attack. According to eyewitnesses at the time, there were many people on the bus at that time, and it was the rush hour for off-duty traffic. At this time, the bus stopped on the platform and an old man walked up.

Next to the old man, a young man is sitting there playing with his mobile phone. The old man stepped forward to give up his seat. Because the young man worked hard all day and did not give up his seat, the old man was very dissatisfied.

In the course of the quarrel, they often cursed each other, and according to eyewitnesses, during the emotional quarrel, the old man slapped the young man four times. Afterwards, the man saw that he was old and did not fight back. He did not notice the extreme behavior of the old man.

When the car reached the next stop, the car stopped, the old man stopped, and then the man got out of the car and left. Just as the young man was leaving, the old man did not grab a seat and sit down. Instead, he stood in the same place, trembling with excitement, and then the old man lay on the ground.

Just after the old man was lying on the ground, onlookers immediately dialed 120 emergency services**. With the whistle of the ambulance, they were rescued by paramedics on the spot and died due to ineffective rescue. According to the report of the relevant department and the certificate provided by the hospital, the old man suffered from heart disease before his death.

Later, he competed for a seat with a young man, and due to his emotions, he died of a heart attack. The local lawyer said that the young man had only had a verbal dispute with the old man and did not know that the old man had a heart condition. The lawyer said he personally did not believe that the person was responsible.

Giving up a seat is not a legal obligation, and no one can force others to give up their seats, let alone infringe on passengers who are unwilling to give up their seats.

I think giving up your seat on the bus is a voluntary thing and should not be morally kidnapped. Personally, I don't think the death of the old man has anything to do with the man.

I think this old man is self-inflicted, and he shouldn't treat this man in such an extreme way, and he is emotional, which is why he has caused such a result.

The law does not stipulate that young people must give up their seats to the elderly, giving up their seats is respecting the elderly, and the elderly are too impulsive to have nothing to do with young people.

This practice of the old man is very incorrect, and the young people nowadays are also very tired, the old and the young they have to be considerate of each other, and the death of the old man has nothing to do with the young man.

I think this old man is so pitiful, for a seat, but ended up burying his own life, it's really not worth it.

I think both of them are responsible, the old man's behavior was too aggressive, maybe too excited, so it led to sudden death.

This kind of consequence makes people feel very uncomfortable, in fact, there is no need to have any opinions about others because of such things, or your own health is the most important.

This may be karma, and his behavior not only affects himself, but also has a deep impact on others, and the gains outweigh the losses.

was shocked by the young man's internal strength and died, reminding the old man who is good to pay attention not to death.

Older people hit men? You can still beat a young man, do you still need to give up your seat if you have the physical strength?

At that time, it was the defendant Wang who parked his car at the door of the deceased Yu Mou's house, and later Yu and Wang had a quarrel because of this, and as a result, Yu, who was suffering from heart disease, died of exhaustion, and Yu's family believed that Wang was the root cause of Yu's death, so they claimed 1.6 million yuan, but in the end, the court ruled that Wang only needed to bear 5% of the responsibility, and about 80,000 yuan was compensated.

First of all, Wang himself is not a resident of Beijing, but a person who goes to Beijing to do business, at that time Wang rented a house, and then parked his car in front of the door of his neighbor Wang, Wang said that he did not know that he could not park there, but the fact that Wang parked indiscriminately did objectively exist.

Because Wang is usually very busy, he didn't come back until three or four days later, Yu was very dissatisfied, so he had a quarrel with Wang, and Wang himself had a good mouth, so Yu was annoyed and angry, and finally let Wang leave under the persuasion of his neighbors.

Secondly, although Wang left temporarily, he felt that he couldn't swallow this breath after returning home, so he took the initiative to run to the door of Yu's house, scolded Yu again, and was persuaded by his neighbors to leave soon after. But Wang didn't plan to let go of this matter at all, so he soon came to the door to insult Yu, and as a result, Yu died of anger at home shortly after arguing with Wang.

Yu's family believed that Wang had caused Yu's death, so they demanded 1.6 million compensation from Yu, but Wang refused.

In the end, the court believed that Yu did die of anger because of Wang's insults, but Wang did not know that Yu had heart disease in advance, and Yu knew that he had heart problems and had conflicts with Wang, so for the result of Yu's death, Yu himself was primarily responsible, and Wang was secondarily responsible, and the court also ruled that Wang should compensate 5%, which was about 80,000 yuan.

As soon as Wang moved in, he parked a car in front of the old man's door, so the old man said, you can't park here, Wang thinks, I have been parked for a few days, you are only now speaking, both of them think they are reasonable, so a fierce quarrel broke out, but the old man suffered from coronary heart disease, so he died suddenly in a fit of anger.

The elderly themselves have underlying diseases, and the neighbors insult the elderly, causing the elderly to have increased blood pressure and thus sudden death.

This old man was scolded by his neighbors very badly and was very angry, so he suddenly suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and died suddenly.

Men should not be compensated, if this needs to be compensated, then it is possible to make themselves bankrupt every day, and giving up their seats is a voluntary act, and others should not be forced to give up their seats.

I don't think there should be compensation, for this kind of scoundrel's demand for justice is at ease in the hearts of the people, should not be based on the interests of others, but should consider the interests of the overall situation, everyone enjoys fair treatment in society.

No, because this matter has nothing to do with the man, and the man does not have to bear it.