The contradiction between freedom of belief and interference in the habits of others

Those who truly understand what "freedom" is, not only pursue it themselves, but also leave others with the freedom not to pursue freedom, that is, the freedom not to interfere with the belief or disbelief of others.

Only people who do not know about freedom will force others to accept their own beliefs when they have their own beliefs.

This phenomenon of forcing others to accept their own beliefs, both in the East and the West, is called violence and is a transgression.

Hello, there are good and bad habits. The good ones should be adhered to, and the bad ones should be learned and abandoned. Of course, faith is a tremendous force, especially faith in the one true God who created heaven and earth, which is very important for establishing good and correct living habits.

Of course, in this case, some people's old, bad habits will be incompatible and even conflict. At this time, some need to be avoided, some cannot be avoided, and we need to be tolerant of each other. These need to be discerned through prayer.

Bless you.

Faith is not just a habit of life, having faith will improve a person's habits of life.

This is actually very easy to reduce, because the son can't stay with his parents forever, he can let him fly, he wants to fly freely, and he has the ability to play by himself, and then his parents' thinking is more traditional, maybe it will limit his thoughts, and then don't let him expand his life repeatedly, so sometimes he can fly freely, or a very good one.

Don't interfere with each other, believe in each other, and don't force it, otherwise the family conflict will become deeper and deeper.

There are many peoples on the earth who have their own beliefs, and they all believe that the gods they believe in are true gods, and the gods that others believe in are false gods or even devils. The religious wars caused by this, I don't know how many people have died so far, and the cold war in your family is just a pediatric.

With the exception of religious states, almost all religions are recognized and freedom of belief is protected. This is true even in our country, where people of many faiths live together peacefully and seek common ground while reserving differences.

You also said, "Please respect other people's beliefs and habits, okay?!" "Then why can't you respect your family's beliefs and habits, but ask them to respect you?

What is the truth of life? Countless mortal philosophers in ancient and modern China and abroad are looking for it, but no one's answer has ever been recognized, and you think you know the truth of life? If you don't have the same faith, you are a "fool"?

I also think it's bad to have no faith, because without faith you have nothing to fear and do whatever you want. But this does not mean that a person is created equal, let alone his family.

Be kind to them, care for them, love them, or your faith will be a lie.

The truth of life? That's just your truth, or the truth of your faith. Why say that slandering people who do not believe in the same faith as you are stupid?

As for your family, your body and life are all given by your mother, if there is a conflict and you don't want to compromise, you should leave by yourself and stick to your beliefs, instead of being angry and resisting your loved ones at home. It's not right for you to do that. And, even if you leave, you have to remember that you still owe a lot of debt to your mother.

It's all about paying it back.

Tell me about your respective beliefs? Some of the beliefs that they think are different are just mere mediocrities.

It's like it's basically an extension of money power or something like that.

Don't worry so much! If you really care, give up your faith. to exchange for their own family happiness. Or live a good life for yourself.

After listening to the lecture "How to manage a life without regrets", I understand how to get along.

I sympathize with you, and look at the Middle East to know what kind of life you live.

It is difficult for a clean official to cut off family affairs, difficult, difficult, difficult, difficult to go to the sky...

There is only no interference with each other, or simply independence.

(1) Concept The crime of illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief refers to the illegal deprivation of citizens' freedom of religious belief by the functionaries of state organs, where the circumstances are serious. (2) Composition 1. Subject of the crime The subject of the crime of unlawfully depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief is a staff member of a state organ. The crime of unlawfully depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief is an act of unlawfully depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief.

Illegal deprivation here refers to the deprivation of others' freedom of religious belief by coercion or other means. Methods of deprivation include: unlawful interference with citizens' normal religious activities; forcible abatement or conversion; compelling citizens to believe in a religion or a denomination of the same religion; Illegally sealing or destroying lawful religious sites and facilities.

The object of the crime of illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief is their freedom of religious belief. Freedom of religious belief here refers to the freedom of whether or not to believe, what religion to believe, what kind of sect, and so on. 2. Culpability: The form of responsibility for the crime of illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief is intentional.

Intentionality here refers to the subjective state of mind that is intentionally carried out knowing that it is an act of illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief. 3. Guilt The element of the crime of illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief is that the circumstances are serious. The circumstances here are serious, and it refers to the illegal deprivation of citizens' freedom of religious belief by heinous means, serious consequences, and bad political influence.

3) Punishment According to the provisions of Article 251 of the Criminal Law, a person who commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention.