Will the Romance of the Three Kingdoms be harder to understand than the Romance of the Three Kingdom

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is wonderfully written, but not history.

History will seem relatively boring and "Three Kingdoms" is actually written very briefly Many things are brushed aside, if the landlord wants to see "Three Kingdoms", it is recommended to read "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" again, of course, to hold a dialectical attitude, so as to better accept the "Three Kingdoms" statement, and it is recommended to read "Three Kingdoms" together with "Three Kingdoms Pei Song's Note", which will be much more detailed.

If you don't know much about classical Chinese, find someone with a vernacular explanation.

1, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is history, and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" (full name is "Popular Romance of the Three Kingdoms") is**!

2. "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is written in classical Chinese, and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is written in vernacular!

3. "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" takes Wei as the authentic one, and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" takes Shu Han as the authentic one.

Therefore, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is more difficult to understand than "Romance of the Three Kingdoms"!

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is an official history, of course, it is more difficult to understand than "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", and it is boring!

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is **, and it is very wonderfully written!

So it's relatively easy to read!

Of course. (Romance of the Three Kingdoms) is an official history, and it is written in the style of biography, of course, it is even more difficult to understand!

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is closer to history and is one of the twenty-four histories. The difference between the two can be described as vastly different. Because the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a literary work, in order to highlight the main characters, a lot of literary techniques are used to process it, which is very different from the actual history.

There is a big difference, and the Three Kingdoms is closer to history. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is adapted from the history of the Three Kingdoms period**, and many of the scenes and episodes in it are fictional, so it is very different from the orthodox history book Three Kingdoms, which was written earlier and more objective than the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, so it is closer to history.

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is to praise Liu and step on Cao, and "Three Kingdoms" is just the opposite. Many of the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" are fictional, and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" was written by Chen Shou, who was a person during the Three Kingdoms period, which is of course more credible.

Categories: Culture Arts >> Literature >>**.

Problem description: Didn't read many books. Watching the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, there is always something I can't understand. I wonder if the Romance of the Three Kingdoms will be more difficult to read?

Analysis: "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is wonderfully written, but not history.

History will seem relatively boring and "Three Kingdoms" is actually written very briefly Many things are brushed aside, if the landlord wants to see "Three Kingdoms", it is recommended to read "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" again, of course, to hold a dialectical attitude, so as to better accept the "Three Kingdoms" statement, and it is recommended to read "Three Kingdoms" together with "Three Kingdoms Pei Song's Note", which will be much more detailed.

If you don't know much about classical Chinese, find someone with a vernacular explanation.

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms", because "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is historical, and it has been adapted on the basis of real history, as well as the author's personal thoughts.

To understand the real history, of course, you have to read the "Three Kingdoms", which is the official history compiled by Chen Shou. "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is ** romance, and there are many facts that do not match the actual situation.

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms", as an official history, is of course closer to real history; As a historical event, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" has the strong characteristics of history, and it is a fiction and interpretation of historical events and historical figures, which is naturally quite different from real history.

Of course, you should watch "Three Kingdoms". "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is only ** after all, and many of the plots in it are adapted by the author on the basis of the original history, and even some of the plots and characters are fictional. If you want to know the real history, you should still read "Three Kingdoms".

It's the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is the official history, and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is just **.

It must be the Romance of the Three Kingdoms The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is**all kinds of processing...

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Romance of the Three Kingdoms, is probably written according to the original history, but there are a lot of fiction and literary creations.

The Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms is a historiographical work of the Eight Classics.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is the official history The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is written according to the official history** Just like the joke series in the current TV series.

I'll give it a go, of course it's the Three Kingdoms.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is the official history.

The Chinese on the planet know it all.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is historiographical material. Closer to reality.

The differences are as follows:

1.The authors of the book are different: Three Kingdoms is Jin? Written by Chen Shou, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is Ming? Luo Guanzhong.

2.The nature of the two books is different: the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms is the official history, and the chronicles and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms are **, which belong to the chapter hui**.

3.The arrangement of the two books is different: because the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms is an official history, it is mainly described by characters, such as the Book of Wei? Emperor Wu Jidi.

1. Wei Shu? Emperor Wen Jidi.

Second, Zhuge Liang's biography, Guan Zhang, Zhao Ma, and Huang biography. Wait, because the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is **, there are 120 times, and it is arranged with the plot of the story, not based on the characters.

4.The main axis of the description of the two books is different: because the Three Kingdoms is an official history, it is mainly based on the Wei State, because Wei replaces the Han State, so it is orthodox, and the Shu State and the Wu State are less orthodox descriptions, and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is more than the author's own personal consciousness.

5.The exaggeration of the plot is not necessarily consistent with the facts: because the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is the official history, it is written as historical facts, and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is **, and the descriptions of the characters deviate from historical facts, and there are many over-heroization or scandalization of some characters.

6.Whether the Four Libraries are included or not: The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is included in the History Department in the Four Libraries, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is not included in the Four Libraries, and the Four Libraries are not included in the ** works.

To put it simply: "Three Kingdoms" is compiled by Chen Shou of the Jin Dynasty, its content is concise, the meaning is profound, the use of "biographical style", that is, what and what people how to pass the biography, divided into "Book of Wei", "Book of Shu" and "Book of Wu", and later annotated by Pei Songzhi, its content is closer to history; The full name of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is "Popular Romance of the Three Kingdoms", which was written by Luo Guanzhong in the late Yuan Dynasty and early Ming Dynasty. There are many versions of this book, and the version of 120 times is now popular, and its content is quite different from history due to the needs of the genre, and the whole is "only praising Liu Bei and scolding Cao Cao". In short, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is a history book, and the overall is more credible, while "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is a **, and there is still a big gap compared with the official history.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is closer to reality. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a storytelling story told by folk artists. There are very serious personal tendencies. Later, there were more books that came out, and they had long been changed.

And the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is historiographical material. Closer to reality.

Relatively speaking, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is real, although I have never read the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and I can't understand it. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is relatively exciting. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms have false content in common, after all, they are all written by people, and it is impossible for every word to be true.

The public generally watches the Romance of the Three Kingdoms because it is easy to understand and pro-Han.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is** is based on the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which is a history book.