What world truths are different from what we imagine?

Through the analysis of the first three phases, we deciphered the fundamental experiment in quantum mechanics, the double-slit interference experiment, and came to a conclusion that was not very satisfactory. There is no way to know what the photon that exists in the microscopic world is what it is. Because, if we want to know what it looks like, we need to use something else to act on it, and things in the microcosm are too small and can be easily influenced, so once something interacts with it, the impact on it is tantamount to a comet hitting the earth.

In this respect, this is a technical problem, and it seems that it will be difficult to solve this problem with future technology. <>

Why do I take the time to talk about it, because it's about the truth of the world, about what each of us sees through our eyes. You think, the particles of the microcosm are so mysterious, we can't do it as they are, so we change them when we look at them, and there is only one world, although we don't know the clear boundary between the microcosm and the macrocosm, but we can still imagine that it is because of our participation that the world has become what it is. <>

Lao Tzu's "Tao Te Ching" says: Tao is Tao, very Tao; The name is famous, and the name is not very famous. This experiment can also be found.

The Tao is actually the world as it is, but we can't observe or speak, and once we want to observe it and want to tell it to others, it becomes tasteless. Wittgenstein also said: Whatever can be said can be said clearly, and we should remain silent about what cannot be said.

The thing that was silent, I think, was the original appearance or Tao of the photon. I roughly understand what Kant said about the self-body of things. <>

In this respect, the physical world and philosophy are closely related and inseparable, both are observations of the same thing, and both are revealing the truth of the world, which is also called the search for truth. Seeing this, some people may gradually understand why I say that the future world is the world of philosophy and physics. Of course, I'm still too simplistic here.

If you want to know the world, you have to look at it and touch it, and if you move it, it is easy to have problems. So, are there any other tricks to defuse it? I'll take my time in the future. At least, if I say it now: there is a truth in the world.

No one will really help you, there are no permanent enemies in this world, there are no permanent friends, only the existence of interests will help you maintain the existing relationship.

In the past, we thought that when we grew up, we would be free, and we would be able to get rid of some discipline from our parents, but now when we grow up, we find that we are not free at all, and the freedom we yearn for is limited.

For example, the Earth is spherical, because a long time ago, many people thought that the Earth was a horizontal plane. At that time, people supported the geocentric sphere, but it turned out that the earth revolves around the sun.

I imagine a world where everyone is equal, there is no distinction between high and low, and everyone can live the life they want and live the way they want without any obstacles.

But the real world will always be full of uncertainty and regret, and the future is unknown, but this is the fascinating part of life. The future is determined by the efforts of the present and cannot be obtained by imagination alone, which is also the charm of life.

Everything in the world must be done by one's own efforts!

For example, if you want to eat desserts for a while, it is not that the brain thinks you want to eat, but that you lack vitamin B in your body, which feeds back to the brain, and then the brain directs you to eat sweets.

This world can't accommodate angels, only two sides and three knives between people are left, a piece of loneliness, but there is still hope in this world, the conditions of life are not given by nature but by the acquired, there are only the law of the jungle and the law of the jungle in the relative world, even if you stand on top of the world, you can't change the world, because I am also a part of the world, part of the law of the jungle, but the world makes us related, if we are in the same direction, it will be beautiful relative to this world, so I believe in hope, My presence will bring the relative closer to the absolute.

To put it simply, you can use Hawking's theory.

We live on Earth, the Earth is in the Solar System, the Solar System is in the Milky Way, the Milky Way is in the universe, and the universe is very big for us.

And then according to the theory of relativity.

The universe is indeed quite large relative to human beings.

But for life outside the universe, maybe the universe is just a walnut, or maybe the universe is all in life, and the activity of life, with a lot of generation and destruction, can be seen as a small explosion.

Such a cycle causes time to advance.

Hawking's calculations have a total of 11 dimensions.

The space we live in is at most three-dimensional space, plus the four-dimensional space of time, and the rest of the space is parallel to it.

Virtual is also relative, so relative to the other 10 spaces, is our space virtual?

If there are two dimensions relative to time and space, our dimension is a mixture of time and space.

False time and false space are mixed together, so maybe it's false, relative to space, our space is real.

But relative to dimension, our space is virtual.

It doesn't matter if you imagine it. Of course, it doesn't matter whether the dream is real or not.

This essay question wants to test the student's ideological quality, whether he pays attention to life, whether he has the ability to improve his life, and whether he has a positive and optimistic attitude towards life. Second, I want to test the student's ability to review the problem. This question is both restrictive and open-ended.

The life you yearn for is to make up for the shortcomings in your life, and it is incomplete to simply talk about the life you yearn for or simply talk about the shortcomings.

The openness of this question is manifested in the fact that you can construct your life in terms of your relationship with the outside world. You can talk about longing for a peaceful life because of the turmoil in the outside world. Because the outside world is full of plundering and destruction of the environment, it yearns for a life ...... in harmony with natureIt can also focus on the reconstruction of the inner world of the individual - because the external environment is full of material desires, so they yearn for a quiet and quiet life, because the external world is full of treachery and hypocrisy, so they advocate the virtue of honesty and faith, and so on.