How to evaluate All materialism is correct, and all idealism is wrong

1) Materialism and idealism are fundamentally opposed, from the fundamental point of view, materialism is correct, idealism is wrong, here we must pay attention to the "from the fundamental point of view".

2) From the perspective of the development form of materialism and idealism, although ancient naïve materialism and modern metaphysical materialism both insist that the original nature of the world is material, both have certain limitations, and both are incomplete and non-scientific. In the process of development, idealism has enriched and developed dialectics, such as Hegel's dialectics, subjective idealism emphasizes people's subjective initiative, encourages people to rationally transform the world, and emphasizes the role of spirit in people.

3) Materialism and idealism exist in comparison and struggle with each other, and the unity of the two opposites promotes the development of philosophy. Therefore, we can neither advocate all materialism in its entirety, nor can we reject all idealism.

First of all, this statement is wrong. The statement is too one-sided, and it is viewed from the point of view that matter determines consciousness. The origin of the world is matter.

Matter determines consciousness, from the point of view of development. Things are constantly changing and evolving. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

Not all materialism is correct. Everything has a stage of development. Materialism includes naïve materialism.

Mechanical materialism. This newly developed materialism is imperfect. So not all materialism is correct, and then look at it from the peculiarity of contradictions.

We must learn to look at problems dialectically. Let's say a painting is placed in front of you. Philosophers will evaluate it with philosophical thoughts.

The artist will evaluate it with the artist's thoughts. And the visionary may see this painting and think about it. From the heart.

It belongs to idealism. Can you say he's wrong?

So this statement is wrong. I'm sorry. It's more rudimentary. It's been a long time since I've read a book. Hehe. There should still be. You can look for it yourself in the book, but I still hope mine can help you.

Why insist on materialism Idealism:Because we must have a world view that truly belongs to us, the only way we really understand the world is science, and the world view formed by using science to understand the world is a materialist world view, so we can get our world view, and it is also a correct world view that we can understand.

Materialism: Matter determines consciousness.

Idealism: Consciousness determines the basic philosophical school of material materialism as opposed to idealism.

It is correct about the relationship between thinking and being, between spirit and matter, acknowledging that the universe is unified with matter, and that spirit or consciousness is the product of matter; The objective material world exists independently of the spirit, and human cognition is a reflection of objective existence.

The development of materialism in the West can be divided into the following three stages: the naïve materialism of the ancient Greek Rona Xiangma, the metaphysics, materialism or mechanical materialism of the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, the dialectical materialism and historical materialism since the nineteenth century, that is, Marxist philosophy. Idealism erroneously addresses the question of who is the first nature and who is the second nature between consciousness and matter, thinking and being.

Idealism believes that consciousness is the first nature, matter is the second nature, consciousness is the origin of the world, there is consciousness first, then there is matter, and consciousness is determined.

A person's worldview can be formed spontaneously.

It is influenced by a person's social environment, which is both economic, political, and cultural. Bend.

To a certain extent, it is a product of practice and an independent choice in the process of internalization.

I insist on materialism because everything in the world is made up of matter, and matter is the premise of everything.

Materialism and idealism are the two major schools of thought in the history of philosophy, and the main point of contention between the two schools is: Who created the world? Matter and consciousness who decides whom?

Who created the world? Materialism holds that the world is created by matter; Idealism holds that the world is created by consciousness. Neither materialism nor idealism corresponds to reality, and both are half right and half wrong.

Some of all things are naturally formed, some are created by man, and some are created by man and nature. For example, cars are created by people, not by nature.

Matter and consciousness who decides whom? Materialism holds that matter determines consciousness; Idealism holds that consciousness determines matter. Consciousness is the performance of the human body, and there is no question of who decides who determines who in the human body and in the consciousness of the person.

Although human beings are also material, they have subjective initiative. In the process of understanding the world and transforming the world, we must neither be materialistic nor idealistic, and we must respect objective laws and give full play to our subjective initiative.

Matter is a big concept and consciousness is a small concept, and the two cannot be compared.

"Dialectical materialism" means both materialistic and non-materialistic, ambiguous, and a typical sophistry.

Historical materialism "holds that history is a natural formation." It advocates resigning to fate and going with the flow. The development of world history is not synchronized with the proof:

History is not determined by material, but by people, and man is the real driving force of historical development. The history of the development of human society is not arranged by "God", but is the choice of human beings themselves.

Materialism and idealism are two polar opposites. Materialism holds that matter determines everything and denies the role of consciousness. Psychic theory holds that consciousness determines everything and denies the role of matter.

Some of everything is naturally formed, some are created by man, and some are created by man and nature. In the process of understanding the world and transforming the world, we can neither materialize nor idealize.

The proposition that matter is the first nature and consciousness is the second nature is a partial generalization. Because only the human brain in the world can produce consciousness, and no other matter can produce consciousness.

"Materialism" and "idealism" are false concepts compiled by Chinese scholars and do not actually exist at all. There have always been two major schools of thought in the history of philosophy: theism and atheism. God refers to God, immortals, and souls.

The heart refers to the human mind. It is an absurd and ridiculous mistake to describe atheism as materialism and theism as Qingliangyu idealism.

First of all, this statement is wrong. The statement is too one-sided.

From the point of view that matter determines consciousness. The origin of the world is matter. Matter determines consciousness, from the point of view of development.

Things are constantly changing and evolving. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. Not all materialism is correct.

Everything has a stage of development. Materialism includes naïve materialism. Mechanical materialism.

This newly developed materialism is imperfect. So not all materialism is correct.

And then from the peculiarities of the contradictions. We must learn to look at problems dialectically. Let's say a painting is placed in front of you.

Philosophers will evaluate it with philosophical thoughts. The artist will evaluate it with the artist's thoughts. And the visionary may see this painting and think about it.

From the heart. It belongs to idealism. Can you say he's wrong?

So this statement is wrong.

From a fundamental point of view, materialism and idealism are fundamentally opposed, materialism is correct, and idealism is wrong. From the point of view of the development process of philosophy, the philosophy of idealism has also enriched and developed dialectics in the process of its development. Therefore, idealism also has a correct and progressive aspect in the history of its development, and it cannot be absolutely said that all idealism is wrong.

Both right and wrong are comparative. Compared with Marxist philosophy, both idealistic philosophy and previous materialist philosophy have their wrong side. Neither ancient naïve materialism nor modern metaphysical materialism is a scientific worldview.

Because ancient naïve materialism regarded the concrete material form as the origin of the world, its view was naïve; Modern metaphysical materialism lacks the idea of dialectics, and cannot understand the world as a material process in constant development, which is mechanical. Therefore, it cannot be said that everything materialism is correct.