If there were no humans on Earth in the beginning, which animal would have been most likely to devel

Updated on science 2024-07-17
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Humans also know that before our appearance, there were many rulers on the earth, they were intelligent civilizations like humans or animals with strong physical energy like dinosaurs, they are likely to have existed on the earth, and it is difficult for humans to find their ancestors.

    However, it should not be a problem for human beings to find their ancestors, but human beings have discovered that Einstein's theory of microbial evolution can be used in human beings themselves, and there will be many loopholes! For example, there were no human beings on the earth, and it was only in the middle of 3 million to 5 million years that human beings came late.

    If there were no humans on Earth in the beginning, which animal would have been most likely to develop a civilization? A species that can create civilization should have the following characteristics: it can smoothly create or hold a high-temperature environment, and the brain of a high-IQ mind cannot do without cooked meat.

    It has the characteristics of special tools for production and manufacturing

    The whole process of manufacturing special tools can promote the evolution of the human brain, the first two can screen out the vast majority of marine animals, only some arthropods and cephalopods that live around the submarine volcano are cleared, and the terrestrial microorganisms get rid of the long claws.

    Social animals and socially cognitive

    Cephalopods replaced, large and medium-sized carnivores replaced

    Imaginative and imaginative

    It is not clear whether other populations have imagination, mammals should have, but it seems that mammals other than humans are not strong enough to think creatively, and are susceptible to instinctive reaction manipulation, but if the cerebral cortex can be illuminated, it should not be a comprehensive few aspects, if humans do not have it in the first place, the users of civilized behavior may be some kind (or of several kinds, there is a high probability of interdependence) arthropods with complex and agile bodies, they are good at excavation and structure, The ability to use resources to renovate the environment may also be the descendants of a certain species of australopithecus called naked apes, and among primates, there are many physiological structures similar to humans, and it is very possible that humans will evolve again.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It should be a gorilla, because gorillas have a very high IQ, and they are second only to humans, and they are very intelligent.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Octopus. Because this animal has 8 brains, its brain is also very developed, and it is also a very intelligent animal.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think the animal that is most likely to develop civilization is the tiger, because the tiger is a very powerful animal species.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I think monkeys and octopuses are the most likely to develop civilizations, because both monkeys and octopuses have distributed intelligence, can use tools, and live in groups.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It is most likely an ape or a monkey, as this animal looks very similar to a human, and these animals are also very intelligent and can walk upright.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I think it's dolphins, dolphins have a very high IQ and are the easiest to develop civilization, and this probability is very high.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Monkeys, because monkeys are the closest thing to humans, and the monkey has a very intelligent IQ, the monkey is a very cute animal.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Monkeys, because monkeys are very smart, monkeys are group-active, and monkeys have a very strong sense of collective activity.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It may be an elephant, a lion, or a tiger, because these animals are relatively large in size and have a relatively large attack power, plus the king of the forest is a tiger.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It could be an octopus, because the octopus has a lot of brains, is a very intelligent animal, and may dominate the earth.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Octopuses are supposed to dominate the planet because octopuses are very intelligent, second only to humans. The octopus may evolve into another creature.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    If there were no humans, dinosaurs would have been able to dominate the planet because dinosaurs were very large and diverse.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    If there were no humans, I think monkeys would probably dominate the planet, because monkeys are really smart.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It takes at least millions of years for a species to evolve, but humans can still discover the evolutionary process of some species. For example, during the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom, the black smoke of the new factories was covered with eucalyptus, allowing the originally white birch plum family to evolve rapidly. White is easily exposed to the black background, and the black hides itself and has a higher probability of survival, so the genetic advantage of birch plums with black genes is greater.

    Originally, the number of this black birch plum was small, but they were more conducive to survival in the new environment, so this genetic trait was passed on to the next generation, and the number of black birch plum was gradually incorporated into the mainstream.

    But at a time when Darwin had just published his theory of evolution, Darwin was not as beautiful as he is now. At the time, he was slammed by certain Guardians. According to the doctrine of evolution, the ancestors of human beings were not the spirit of God, but animals from nature.

    This statement is a fact that many people cannot accept. Some of those who worked to preserve "human purity" blamed Darwin and even said that he was a "descendant of monkeys".

    But Darwin did not say that humans are "descendants of monkeys". It is a misreading of the theory of evolution. Much has been written about the origin of humanity, and there is no longer any boredom here.

    In conclusion, it is a widely accepted scientific fact that humans originated from animals in nature. When we were in school, my teacher also told me that humans are "higher animals". Obviously, humans can't get out of the quagmire with animals.

    That is, the relationship between humans and animals has long been determined. That is, there are mammals that are the ancestors of humans. Dinosaurs and humans share a common ancestor (in fact, all species on Earth have a common ancestor).

    About 500 million years ago, the Cambrian species was large**, and marine life erupted**.

    After the sea creatures landed on land, they evolved into reptiles, reptiles gradually rose, and many branches evolved. None of the countless branches could cover the sky with one hand. About 100 million years ago, the 2 million-year-old rainstorm – the Kanigi Flood – became an important dividing line in the evolutionary history of Earth's species.

    At that time, the earth's continents were not separated, they were all gathered together. Volcanoes on the Earth's surface erupt frequently, with high temperatures and severe desertification on the surface. Species need to evolve in the direction of drought tolerance.

    As the temperature rises, seawater evaporates and accumulates in the atmosphere, hitting both marine and terrestrial life hard. Intense volcanic eruptions lasted for 5 million years.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Before human beings, there was no more advanced earth civilization than human beings, for example, if there really existed earth civilization, it would not die out from this, so human beings are undoubtedly the only social civilization that has appeared on the earth.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    From lower organisms to higher animals, cells are replicated under the control of genes, but in the process of replication, some gene mutations produce wrong results, good results are continued, and bad results are eliminated. The result of such a hundred billion errors has given rise to countless living systems. Among them is the freak of us humans (for the whole biological system).

    The reason why only human beings have evolved wisdom is that I personally think that it is like many monkeys playing the piano, of which 100 billion are playing the piano indiscriminately, but purely by chance they happened to play a Beethoven's song"March of Life"。Thus human beings have appeared, and they are unprecedented, unique, and incomparable.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It may be because the time, place and people have not reached it, and there is a lack of a meeting point, so there is no high-level civilization.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because the development process of animals is different, people are more intelligent and develop faster.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    It is because in the process of development, some of the other branches have perished, and only human beings continue to live.

Related questions
15 answers2024-07-17

530 million years ago, during the Cambrian period, there were signs of a great explosion of life on Earth, and all kinds of aquatic life flourished. Judging from the fossils excavated in the hori, it seems that all life appeared at the same time. >>>More

14 answers2024-07-17

Nobody knows, because nobody.

4 answers2024-07-17

Where did humans come from, and there are doubts about human evolution.

11 answers2024-07-17

No, the world has evolved over hundreds of millions of years, and the rebirth and destruction of any species is a natural law, and no matter which species has its own responsibilities and roles in this world, if there are no bees in the world, there will be another species to do what bees should do. The world is not going to be destroyed by any species other than humans.

18 answers2024-07-17

Remember: Chinese, mathematics, foreign languages to lay a good foundation, because whether it is science or liberal arts they are very important, in addition to if you are interested in science, after class should focus on the study of science, but in class should try to learn more liberal arts things, not to cope with the exam, but to increase more knowledge for yourself, such as geography, history, these are still useful, to high school 2 although you also have to take the liberal arts, but will not be recorded in the total score of science, even if you can't pass, pay 5 yuan to make up the exam fee, hehe, Don't worry, I'm from here, and I wish you the best of luck in your studies!