Asking others to torture themselves should be held responsible, no

If you ask others to torture yourself, if you go too far, you will also have to bear the corresponding responsibility if you break the law.

If you hurt yourself by mistake during the test, should others be held responsible? It's the reason, it's entirely your own, how can you still hold someone else responsible? And don't quarrel with others in the future.

If you accidentally hurt someone, you must be held responsible, because after all, you are the one who hurt the other, whether you did it intentionally or unintentionally, you need to be held responsible.

Others will definitely not take responsibility, because you hurt yourself, so you have nothing to do with others, don't hold others accountable.

If you hurt yourself by mistake, others are not responsible, after all, the other party did not directly hurt you.

Others will definitely not take responsibility, because you hurt yourself by mistake, and it has nothing to do with others.

I don't think there's any responsibility for this, so sometimes there's really no need to think too much.

No matter what the situation is, accidentally injuring someone is just a matter of considering the plot, but if you accidentally injure someone, you still have to take the other party to the hospital for examination and medical treatment, and be responsible for the cost of medicine.

Of course, you can't take responsibility for this, it should be your own fault, you hurt yourself by mistake, and it has nothing to do with others.

No, because it is you who accidentally hurt yourself, and the responsibility borne by others is not very large, the key lies with you.

In a quarrel with others, I accidentally hurt myself, should others be held responsible? That's definitely not right, if you hurt yourself, others will still burden you.

If you hurt yourself by mistake, others should not be held responsible.

In the midst of quarrels with others, if you accidentally hurt yourself, others do not have to take responsibility.

This is a language question. The so-called obligation not to protect oneself means that an obligation, that is, the so-called must do something, which damages your personal legitimate rights and interests, then this obligation is not a real obligation, if this thing does not cause damage, you only need to bear your own losses, and the losses of others do not need to be borne.

The so-called obligation not to protect oneself means that an obligation, that is, the so-called must do something, which damages your personal legitimate rights and interests, then this obligation is not a real obligation, if this thing does not cause damage, you only need to bear your own losses, and the losses of others do not need to be borne.

The so-called obligation is that you have to undertake to perform, and failure to perform is a breach of contract.

That is, not to protect yourself, to take responsibility for what happens, not for others. You this is legal terminology.

For example, if you don't value your life and then jump off a building, then it is you, not someone else, who loses your life.

A bit of a winding, obligations and responsibilities coexist at the same time.

Obligations need to be fulfilled, and failure to perform is subject to liability.

Protect yourself, it's not a big deal, don't think so much about it, go to bed early and get up early, study hard and go to work.

It is to let you have more eyes, be more vigilant, and protect yourself.

The highest temperature lawyer wants to solemnly legal issues.

Just take your own obligations.

Protect yourself and look out for everything.

It's not interesting, maybe I just can't sleep in the middle of the night, get up and listen to the song, don't be suspicious, maybe he really just likes this song, nothing else, wash and sleep early, it's not early, it's not good for your eyes to look at your phone more.

Therefore, people should not make promises to others lightly.

We must learn to use the law to protect ourselves and seek fairness, selflessness and fair judgment

Of course, time doesn't change anything, as long as you still see each other as friends, then it's still the same. We 9464695943346594364949111

When two people quarrel, and one of them asks the other party to beat him, and the other party really beats him, who is more responsible in this situation.

If the injury is minor (above), you can request that the other party be held criminally liable and civil liability; If the injury is slight, it can be required to bear civil liability for compensation to the mold party, and if the investigation and nuclear combustion station cannot mediate, it can directly go to the court to sue. If the failure constitutes a minor injury or more than a minor injury, the beater is suspected of the crime of intentional injury and shall be investigated for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law. If the injuries are assessed to be minor, only civil compensation can be claimed, and the victim can sue directly to the court for personal injury compensation; At the same time, an administrative penalty may be requested.

After the public security organ files a case, the victim may also file a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case to demand compensation. Of course, it is also possible to sue directly in court for personal injury compensation. Personal injury compensation items include:

Medical expenses, nursing expenses, lost work expenses, hospital meal allowances, nutrition expenses, transportation expenses, disability compensation, mental injury solace, etc.

Yes. If the other person commits the act, even if it is done according to your instructions, it constitutes intentional homicide.

Ah, some fool who did what you asked you to do will be sentenced to death for intentional homicide.

No one has the right to deprive others of their lives, and even if you want to commit suicide, you can't let someone stab them, otherwise it will be the same crime.

I guess you have a brain disease, go to the doctor, you ask someone to kill you, it is better for you to kill yourself, because you don't have to bear any legal responsibility when you die......Even if you die, don't hurt anyone else! If you meet a fool who listens to you and really kills you, and you have to pay for your life and bury you, you are really a person who harms others and yourself!

The other party's act is entrusted to kill, which constitutes the crime of intentional homicide and needs to bear legal responsibility. However, since it is requested by a person who has already had suicidal intent, the punishment may be lenient.

Of course, there is also legal responsibility. No one has the right to deprive others of their lives, except for the state legal apparatus!

Whatever it is? Murder has to be held responsible, no one has the right, just take someone else's life, even if she wants to commit suicide, you can't help, this is absolutely not allowed in the law!

You're a very interesting person, you can die yourself, why bother others? There are many ways to die, you can choose, that's your right, let others kill you, I'm afraid I can't find such a person in the world, suddenly want to keep you, don't die, let's live well, although there are more than you in the world, there are not many less of you, and there are many people who die well!!

Of course, if you break the law, if you kill someone, you will break the law, don't care who let it, it's not easy for you to let it, you are also guilty, you are all arrested and shot. What an idea!

It's funny, why would you ask someone to kill you? What is the purpose, don't harm innocent people.

Generally, the mistakes you make should be borne by yourself, and this cannot be borne by others for you, because everyone needs to be responsible for their own industry.

In life, everyone's industry behavior should be standardized and regulated. Because if you're not careful, it's easy to make mistakes.

And everyone needs to pay for the mistakes they make. And everyone should develop good habits from an early age and not do things that should not be done.

Only in this way can you behave properly and follow the rules. As the saying goes, there are no rules. If a person doesn't even have the bare minimum of consciousness.

In this way, it is difficult to move forward on the road of life. Therefore, everyone needs to take responsibility for their own mistakes.

If you're an adult over the age of 18, that's it. If you make a mistake yourself, you should be fully responsible for your actions.

It's self-inflicted.

What about my answer?

1. Where the other party's **, medical records, and other information show that he was indeed injured on the day of the incident, and the materials were indeed taken and recorded by the timely medical treatment on the day of the incident, the public security organs shall find that the other party submits an application for evaluation, and the public security organs shall issue a power of attorney for evaluation, and the evaluation results are valid. During the evaluation, the forensic appraisal agency will analyze the cause of the injury and the causal relationship with the course of the fight, and if the injury is not related to the course of the case investigated by the public security organ, the public security organ will not determine it.

2. When the public security organs handle a case of injury, if there is evidence showing that the beater was injured himself, not the other party's actions, the other party does not need to bear any legal responsibility for the injury.

For example, if the other party beats your brother, and in the process of beating, there is evidence to prove that your brother did not fight back, and the other party's injuries were caused by himself, and your brother does not bear legal responsibility.

If the other party beats your brother, and in the course of the beating, your brother pushes, pulls, pulls, or fights back against the other party, causing injury to the other party, and the two parties cannot reach a mediation agreement, the public security organs will punish both parties in accordance with the law.

If while in the process, if he himself is injured.

The cause has nothing to do with your brother or sister-in-law.

Then there will certainly be no problem.

If it has a relationship with your brother.

Consider emergency evacuation.

If it has something to do with your sister-in-law, then you need to look at it specifically.

According to the relevant provisions of the General Principles of the Civil Law, if you hit someone.

If an individual is injured because of his or her assault, your brother is not liable, and if your brother is driving a tractor and causing the injury to the person who hit someone, your brother will still be liable for civil damages. At the same time, if your brother is slightly injured, you can also ask the public security organ to impose a public security penalty on the beater.

Zongheng Legal Network-Guangdong Qinnuo Law Firm-Zhang Bangyong lawyer.

1. Yes.

2. No need, emergency avoidance.

The identification is valid, and if it is not for your brother's fighting, he is not responsible.

If you put something aside and cause someone else to be injured, you need to bear the corresponding legal responsibility. Because you put something by yourself and cause others to be injured, it is a tort liability, and the party's behavior has caused injury to passers-by, so you should bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

Legal analysisLiability for damage to property in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. That is, the tort liability borne by the infringer to the victim due to the damage caused to others by stacking, dumping, or scattering articles that obstruct the passage on public roads. Liability for road management defects.

That is, the management department of public roads has the obligation to ensure that the roads are intact, safe and smooth. For the pile-up, dumping, scattering of items that obstruct the passage on the public road, the road management department shall promptly clean and eliminate. If the road authority violates the above obligations, it shall also bear tort liability to the victim.

The responsibility of the perpetrator of stacking, dumping, and scattering and the responsibility of the road manager should be determined according to the specific actual situation: there are both perpetrators and managers. If the manager can prove that he has fulfilled his obligations of cleaning, protection and warning, and the actor cannot prove that he is not at fault, the actor shall bear full liability for compensation; If neither party can prove that it is not at fault, then each party shall bear the responsibility commensurate with the degree of its fault and the causal force, and such liability shall be dealt with according to the share liability, and the manager's passive omission shall bear secondary liability compared with the actor's positive tortious act.

Cases where the perpetrator's whereabouts are unknown. At this time, if the manager is unable to provide evidence to prove that he is not at fault, he shall be liable according to his fault. The responsibilities of road managers should also be considered in conjunction with the current situation of road management, operation and control.

In the case of closed highways, in general, they should have heavier management responsibilities than other highways. Therefore, you need to bear legal responsibility for putting things on the side of the road and causing others to be injured.

Legal basis"Civil Code of the People's Republic of China" Article 1256 Where items that obstruct passage are piled up, dumped, or scattered on public roads, causing damage to others, the perpetrator shall bear tort liability. If the public road manager cannot prove that he has fulfilled the obligations of cleaning, protection, warning, etc., he shall bear the corresponding responsibility.

If you put something aside and cause others to be injured, one did not set up warning signs, and two did not do a good job of protection, as long as it was not someone else who deliberately touched the porcelain, it must be subject to civil liability, that is, compensation, because if it was not for the things you put on others, others would not be injured, so legal responsibility should not be used, and civil compensation must be indispensable.

If you put your things aside and cause someone else to get hurt, you will have to bear legal responsibility and all the medical expenses.

If the injury is serious, you may be legally responsible, depending on the result of your negotiation with the other party, if the other party does not sue you and compensate in cash, you may not be legally responsible.

Should I say look at what your stuff is placed in**? If it is placed in a public space and causes injury to others, you may need to bear certain legal responsibility.

If you put something aside and cause others to be injured, you will bear legal responsibility, mainly depending on where you put it, if it is an aisle, it must be wanted.

I don't think you need to take any responsibility for the things you put aside to hurt others, after all, it was he who touched it.