With the growth of e commerce, will physical stores be banned?

I don't think brick-and-mortar stores will be banned, because e-commerce is not formal enough, there are a lot of counterfeit and shoddy products, and many people say that they have been deceived during the online shopping period, and the consumer experience is not good.

No, there is a large proportion of middle-aged and elderly people who do not like to shop online and like to go to physical stores to buy things, so physical stores will not be banned.

It's not going to go out of business. Because the development of e-commerce has become mainstream, and it has brought a lot of jobs. So e-commerce won't go out of business.

Probably not, now e-commerce is a major trend, all walks of life are inseparable from e-commerce, may become more and more standardized, but will not go out of business.

The e-commerce industry is not going to go out of business entirely. Because the e-commerce industry is very convenient for the residents of our country. There are so many benefits. It also makes many people find employment in the e-commerce industry.

With the gradual development of e-commerce, the operation of these brick-and-mortar stores has been seriously threatened. In addition to this one reason, there is actually the epidemic, and everyone wants to tighten their belts to get by.

The reason for the collapse of the entity is the impact of online e-commerce, as well as the blow of the social status quo, in the increasingly convenient life, people are pursuing speed and convenience.

Personally, I think the reason for being affected by e-commerce is relatively large, because online shopping is very convenient now, and it is relatively cheaper.

Offline stores will go out of business, because under the influence of the epidemic, many stores have been affected to varying degrees, and many merchants have closed down, coupled with the development of the e-commerce industry, resulting in a decrease in the interests of offline stores, so offline stores will definitely go out of business.

Offline stores will never go out of business, because there are many people who will go to the next store to buy clothes, and they will not buy them all the time, because the clothes on the Internet actually can't see the quality.

Probably not, because there are still many people who are willing to go to offline stores to buy clothes, because you can try on clothes when you buy offline, which is something that is not available online.

No, although e-commerce is very popular, it will not replace all stores.

In the past, a colleague worked in an e-commerce company in Shenzhen, and in recent years, he has felt the changes brought about by e-commerce to him and the survival methods of his colleagues over the years.

I can't help but wonder how much room there is for the livelihood of the real economy, and which industries and offline entities are likely to dissipate?

This side did not keep up with the measures during the web page during the meeting of the pro? The real economy vs the e-commerce economy is conclusive, from my one-sided perspective; 1. I think that people are too rightful about e-commerce and the real economy. 2. E-commerce is a new real economy, and the store that was originally opened on the street can now be opened to a very far place to experience rapid delivery to complete the service.

The basic elements demanded by the real economy have not changed. 3. E-commerce is more like a new version of the original real economy "Internet +". Some merchants have e-commerce their transactions, and some have not.

Take the restaurant as an example, if I can experience ** and WeChat to advocate myself, I can take over the orders placed on the website, I think it is e-commerce. 4. Any real economy must be subject to external pressure in a changing world. If you want a pool of stagnant water, you can only be engraved.

5. If you have to discuss the "blow of e-commerce to the real economy" according to the usual understanding, I think there are: 1) the customer base of the real economy will be comparable to the cost of online and offline 2) because e-commerce can experience the reduction of housing costs and the reduction of no staff to reduce the old cost, so the cost is lower than that of offline stores.

<>3) Some of them can be completely e-commerce, that is, offline stores are completely abandoned. It's like clothes. 4) Some people are not able to take the online and offline together, just like offline stores are only used for display, people who are not in a hurry to purchase, and people who are not in porridge shopping 5) If the existing real economy cannot adapt to the competition in e-commerce and does not give feedback, it will gradually enter the twilight and be eliminated in the end.

Therefore, in a nutshell, the real economy and the e-commerce economy can interact with each other, and in a serious situation, the future is the integration of online and offline, and the two are opposite to each other and exciting each other. Offline stores allow users to truly experience the product: touchable and perceptible.

The e-commerce supply chain can reach the insight and low-cost planning of the user group, and can reverse customize the product according to the needs of the user group, so as to better serve the non-user group. Regardless of the time of economic development, the real economy is the basic basis for China's economic development and in foreign economic competition.

Only by using heavy taxes on e-commerce can we save the majority of the people in China!! The e-commerce platform does not allow middlemen to make the difference, violates the rules of commercial wealth redistribution, highly monopolizes profits to the platform to eat alone, and at the same time compresses factory profits to the limit, so that profit-driven reproduction fails, and research and development is impossible. This kind of internal friction extreme sports should be stopped in time.

I don't think e-commerce should be banned, because e-commerce does bring us great convenience and make our lives very convenient. After all, this is an information age, and people like convenience, so if e-commerce is banned, it may bring a lot of inconvenience.

No. Although e-commerce has affected the development of the real economy, it has also played a huge role and solved many social problems. Therefore, it should not be banned.

E-commerce does have its good side. But in the end, it will do more harm than good. In fact, e-commerce should be a supplement to physical stores.

E-commerce can enrich product categories. But it has to be more expensive than the brick-and-mortar. Something has to be of the same quality as the entity.

Can't do that. It's better to turn it off. It is simply a disaster for the country and the people, and the longer this situation continues, the greater the harm.

The rise of e-commerce is the scientific progress of the times, so entities do not want to be eliminated to keep up with the times, embrace the Internet, the times are changing, you do not change, it is not the fault of the times.

E-commerce can't be banned. The economy generated by e-commerce is very large. It has a certain role in promoting China's economy.

The biggest problem of China's e-commerce is capital monopoly, bargaining to grab the market!! The reason for this problem is the serious lack of state management of Internet commerce. Capitalists monopolize Internet commerce and engage in low-price dumping, resulting in factory closures, unemployment of workers, and the closure of a large number of offline businesses, making it difficult for a large number of individual small and micro enterprises to operate.

The Internet business is dominant, and several capital predators are supported, but it makes it difficult for thousands of individuals and small and micro enterprises to continue to operate, and trillions of workers and entrepreneurs are facing unemployment and layoffs, and China's economy will inevitably decline in the long run!!

From the point of view of commodity circulation, e-commerce sells 1 trillion, which is equivalent to 25 trillion less physical stores (not specifically referring to the real economy), and this 2 5 trillion is the original money of ** merchants at all levels, physical stores, shop owners, taxes, and employee wages in each link, that is, there is less money circulation of 2 5 trillion in the market, and the impact is clear at a glance. But the development of science and technology to this stage, the original decades and hundreds of years of commodity circulation model (producers, wholesalers, regional **, provincial generation, municipal generation, terminal physical stores) can really go back, just like machines instead of people, is the industrial revolution, e-commerce instead of physical stores, is the information revolution. There is no turning back, and all those who were in the original circulation link should and must enter new areas.

This is the law of development.

Strict norms! All aspects of live streaming must be taxed according to the regulations! Personal income tax should be strictly investigated!

Regulate live broadcast platforms, those with negative energy, those that stir up social instability, those who attract attention, and those who spread negative energy must be severely punished, and those who do not supervise the platform effectively will also be severely punished if they are not online, and those who refuse to change will be directly shut down. E-commerce must be strictly managed, strictly investigated for taxation, and counterfeit goods are jointly and severally liable. Monopolies should initiate anti-monopoly laws to split up.

It is strictly forbidden for capital to get involved in finance and industries related to the national economy and people's livelihood, and it is strictly forbidden for capital to compete for profits with the people. It is strictly forbidden for capital to get involved in the political field and avoid the formation of a chaebol class, otherwise those who should be caught and those who should be killed will be killed!

E-commerce will lead to problems in the whole society, such as the chaos of goods, the increase in unemployment, the instability of materials, the instability of entities, the increase in unemployment, the ensuing closure of shopping malls, the inability to rent out a large number of shops, the problems of real estate, and the problems of related industries, etc.! When all the problems broke out one day, the management regretted it too late! E-commerce is extremely harmful, it will drag down the entire economy!

It's a pity that our management is short-sighted!

Now there is a strange thing, that is, someone puts a brick-and-mortar store hat on the head of the store, further claiming to be the real economy. Fish in troubled waters. The real economy refers to manufacturing, not business.

The store is a business, and e-commerce is also a business, and there is no conflict with the manufacturing industry to help the manufacturing industry promote its products. E-commerce only competes with stores, and e-commerce can also put a physical e-commerce hat on its head, but it disdains to play pediatric games. Isn't what e-commerce sells real?

E-commerce is similar to asking manufacturers to deliver goods to their homes, what's wrong?

People have no foresight, but they must have near-term worries. The online business platform is Ponzi**. The first chain of the physical industrial chain is the foundation of eternity.

I can't believe in the model of online business, which is a thirst-quenching development model. A vicious parasitic economic model. A model that relies on low prices and low quality to harm the normal market, and a model that downgrades the overall consumption of society, no one is willing to work hard to engage in research and development, and there is no motivation to make people concentrate on development.

If you are greedy for a little bit now, you will suffer a big loss in the future. It's like cancer cells on your body. The market economy is a moral, legal economy, and a virtuous cycle development economy.

Can century-old brands and century-old stores rely on their rogue marketing and rogue promotion? The Internet is just a tool, it's not a panacea. The Internet is directionally and logically wrong.

The self-destruction of the Great Wall, the mode of self-chaos really can't be wanted!!

The emergence of e-commerce has led to a large number of people losing their jobs, resulting in all enterprises losing the motivation to research new products, counterfeit and shoddy products are not feared, a large number of wholesale markets and shopping malls across the country have closed down, and the most important thing is that the younger generation has become otaku and otaku without social interaction.

It is not necessary to ban e-commerce, the advantage of e-commerce is just **, and it is enough to use taxes to adjust e-commerce and entities. It was originally the preferential policy that made the online ** low. In particular, the acquiescence of fakes must be cleared.

Eighty percent of e-commerce is fake, cheap is not good, the quality of e-commerce products is the same as that of physical stores** will not be so cheap, e-commerce must be rectified, there are too many fakes.

The huge impact of the real economy has caused the people to become unemployed, and the society has become more rich and poor, and the country must vigorously develop the real economy.

The e-commerce platform is like a desperate network, and nothing will be born under the network. The consequences of e-commerce platforms will gradually appear in the next five years!

The ban should be banned, and the e-commerce platform is full of countless fake and shoddy products, which has caused great harm to the protection of intellectual property rights!

, Look at such a big world, what are you yourself with, you want to ban this today and ban that tomorrow, it's really beyond your strength!

E-commerce, live broadcasting, Internet celebrities do not fall, and entities do not prosper, the reason is that the money is concentrated in the hands of a few people, and even transferred to foreign countries.

There is no need to ban it, the key is not to mess around, everyone is unified, and there can be no malicious competition.

It should not be banned because it should be banned, but because it should be vigorously developed, and the Internet will create new glories for the motherland.