What do you think are the pros and cons of whether your wife should be a full time dad with an annua

Nowadays, many women are reluctant to have children, because after giving birth, it largely means that you have to be a full-time mother, because it is difficult for a father to be a full-time father, so the responsibility of taking care of the child falls on the mother. Two different options have both advantages and disadvantagesIf you choose to be a full-time father, it means that the role of often not going home to work overtime has become a mother, and the children of this family still lack love, but what was lacking in the past was father's love, and now what is lacking is maternal love, of course, the advantage is that the child is taken care of, and the mother does not have to be so tired; If you don't choose to be a stay-at-home father, then you still have to take care of the child, and because the father has never taken care of the child, so he will not understand the mother's hard work, the family may become more disharmonious, and the benefit may be that the child gets more love, because maternal love has always been more delicate than father's love.

The premise of this debate is that the wife's annual salary is one million, which means that the family no longer has to worry about money, and now the question is who will take care of the children? But it doesn't mean that the choice can be realized, because many fathers will not take care of their children, in most families the father's love is blunt, but the mother's love is delicate and gentle, if the father is forced to take care of the child, then the child's growth process is definitely not healthy under the care of the mother.

When you choose to become a full-time mother, it means that you have no financial ability, and your life is completely your husband, then your husband realizes this, maybe the whole person will become complacent, and the attitude towards you will not be so good Your life is completely in the hands of your husband, in case you meet a person with a bad character, it will be even more painful, so a full-time mother is really the most tiring profession now.

So I think there should be neither a full-time mother nor a full-time father, just like Ran Gaoming said, a person's full-time must mean another person's dereliction of duty, there is a person who takes care of the child full-time, then the other person will not care about the child at all, and after the child has an accident, he will only blindly blame the person who takes care of the child, so I think the best environment for a child to grow up is the parents, both of them have a very concerned state for the child, And it's not that the responsibility of taking care of children should be borne by one person, both people should give love to their children, and they should take care of their children more in their free time, and care for their children, so I think this debate is actually unsolvable, because no matter which choice is unsatisfactory.

The advantage is that you don't have to work, you don't have to make money to support your family, and the disadvantage is that you will gradually be separated from society, especially in the workplace society, and it will be difficult to integrate into the workplace if you want to continue to work in the future.

The advantage is that there is someone at home to take care of it and save a lot of worry, and the disadvantage is that it is likely to lead to some conflicts in the family, which is not conducive to harmony.

If the wife has an annual salary of one million, you can consider being a full-time dad, if you are a full-time dad, you can first experience that it is not easy for a woman in society to be a housewife, and you can also experience the difficulty of your wife when taking care of your children, and love your wife more.

I think being a stay-at-home dad can give your children a better education, and at the same time, you can do better at home. But the disadvantage is that without economic independence, the status of the family will decline.

Although the annual salary of my wife is millions, as a man, I don't think you should be a full-time father, you should use these millions of annual salary as an investment, learn to invest, and make yourself richer, because if a man is a full-time father, he will eventually be looked down upon by women. Only knowing how to use one's own ability to surpass oneself and make the family more prosperous is the most right.

If your wife earns millions a year, as a husband, I think it's best not to be a stay-at-home father. Although I can do my best to take care of my own family. But it's also bad for your position at home.

After all, your wife earns money to support you, and in the eyes of outsiders, you eat soft rice. If your wife is strong, she will also think you are useless. If you don't have parents to help you watch the children, you can hire a babysitter.

Because there are a lot of things to do at home. There are also a lot of worries. The key depends on what you think, if you are loving as a husband and wife, if your wife wants you to be a full-time father.

Yes, but if my wife is strong, I think it's better to find a job of your own. That way you won't feel too inferior.

I don't think so, because now we all pay attention to financial independence, even if the wife has an annual salary of one million, but after all, it is not our own money, we can empathize with it, if there is so much money, we can hire a nanny, or both parents to take care of the children for us,

The wife's annual salary is millions, and the husband should not be a full-time father, as a man in China, he needs to make money to support his family, even if he does not earn as much money as his wife, but it is better than full-time, at least in front of relatives, he will not let people say that he eats soft rice.

Your wife is a successful person with a salary of millions a year, and since you have so much money, you don't need to be a stay-at-home dad Hire a nanny to solve all the housework in the house and the problems between life Men have to work, you have your own business, and you don't want to be a stay-at-home dad.

It depends on what the wife means, who earns more money, who has the final say! Of course, if your husband doesn't want to be a stay-at-home father, you can also discuss it with your wife, after all, husband and wife still have to respect each other!

The wife's annual salary is millions, the husband should not be a full-time father, but also should have his own career, can not eat soft rice, two people should fly together, and then two people share the responsibility of the family, so that two people are happier to get along with each other.

If your wife earns millions of dollars a year, then you can choose whether to be a stay-at-home father or not, after all, this is related to family status and the happiness of future generations. When it may have less power to speak in the family, it will also increase the likelihood of a happy childhood.

The wife's annual salary is several million, and the husband can be a full-time father. There's no shame at all! Educating children is also an honorable and arduous task. Good logistics (husband) is also a strong backing for the front (wife). As long as the family is harmonious and happy!

This is not necessarily, it depends on the family situation, some families have a high annual salary, but the housework at home does not need to be done by themselves, they can be done by the nanny, so it is not necessary to be a full-time father, but some families feel that the child is higher than the full-time one.

The wife's annual salary is several million, and the economy is quite comfortable, but even so, the husband should not be a full-time father, he must have his own career, no matter how much he earns, he will have his own economic income if he has a job, he will be more confident, and he will not be out of touch with society. Although the dedication of a full-time father to the family is also very hard, but the wife is so good, the husband must work hard to improve himself, whether in terms of education or professional skills. Come on!

The wife has an annual salary of one million, the family is already very wealthy, and she can afford a nanny, and if her husband is willing, she can be a full-time father, mainly depending on the actual situation of each family.

Whether or not to be a full-time dad with an annual salary of one million actually depends on the decision of your family, and this question is indeed very sharpIn fact, it is different for every family, if you really need someone to be a full-time dad in your family, then someone must need to go out to earn money, then for such a situation, in fact, more people in the family are measured, if you can be a full-time dad, then you can do it, but for full-time dads, in fact, it is not very good to do, and for boys, they have no experience with children, sometimes there may be more women with children, Then face such a situation. In fact, most mothers are also worried about whether their fathers will be able to take care of their children, and sometimes it is true that for fathers, full-time may just be a place for them to play with their mobile phones, rather than really accompanying their children.

For this kind of situation, in fact, I don't think it's necessary to be a full-time dad at all, and if my wife works very hard, let me myself also share a little responsibility, for this phenomenon, I think this topic is more due to the fact that each of us in today's society, for full-time mothers to take care of children and take care of the family This situation is a discussion, because for this situation, it is indeed unfair to women, they have to consider the family, It is also necessary to consider that work is indeed a lack of skills, and it is more of a call for each of us to pay attention to our own families and children.

Sometimes many people don't think about it so much, just think that maybe the father can take the child, but when they really face this situation, they will not have so much patience, and for men and women, the division of responsibilities between the two people must be different, from ancient times to the present, men generally go out to work, women generally take care of children, this is what we all understand, and we are all familiar with, but in the face of the current situation, if it is really necessary for a person to do full-time, Then it depends on who has the highest income and can bring more income to the family.

Sometimes we see a lot of full-time dads, they are also very difficult, most of the time, we see more people, some of this possibility, for the wife annual salary of one million to be a full-time dad,This question depends on the decision of one's own familyIf the family thinks it is appropriate, then you can do it. But for this problem, there is a major contradiction in today's society, or that today's society needs to pay attention to womenFor this question, it is actually quite sharp

Of course, why not, of course, this question is very sharp, and it is a world problem for everyone.

I don't think it's a full-time dad. I don't think the question is very sharp. Because such problems are very normal and universal.

I don't think it's necessary, people have to be financially independent. The question is indeed sharp, and it is difficult for many people to make a choice.

I think it's okay to be a full-time dad, after all, it's not a woman's business to take care of the baby alone, which of the husband and wife has more financial strength, and the other is at home with the baby.

My point of view is that both husbands and wives should have their own careers, whether they are stay-at-home dads or stay-at-home mothers, neither is advisable. On the one hand, the reason is that taking care of the family is the joint responsibility of both husband and wife, and the growth of children also needs the company of both parents; On the other hand, if the other half's career is frustrated, the family may cause greater conflicts because of the loss of financial **.

This is the debate topic of "Wonderful Sayings", and in the end, the opposing side won. Each of them has a point, but I'm on the right side.

The premise of this problem is that the father's income is not as high as the wife's, and it must be much lower, otherwise this problem does not exist. So, why should a family with millions of incomes be bothered by this problem? Dad can work full-time.

In fact, as far as the time to take care of the children, full-time is only those years, and after the end of elementary school and junior high school, there is no need for full-time at all, as long as there is a job with a higher degree of freedom, you can take care of it.

If you don't work full-time, can you make millions a year in the past few years?

People still have to be realistic, and the debate topic that the strange thing is just a debate topic, not to mention, there are completely auxiliary solutions, such as hiring a nanny or something.

If the wife earns millions a year, the husband can be a full-time father at home. Because the wife is very busy with work and money, and usually has no time to take care of the family and children, the husband should support his wife's career at this time, help her share the pressure, and be a full-time father at home with the children and take care of the family's affairs.

I think it's not to be a stay-at-home dad, because being a stay-at-home dad is a lot of pressure.

Want. Because one of the husband and wife must always compromise and make greater sacrifices to the family, if the woman's career success is on the rise, the man can also sacrifice to be a stay-at-home father.

No. Once you don't work, the gossip outside can drive you crazy, and in the long run, your wife will think that you are incapable and lazy.

I think I can be a stay-at-home father, because someone outside the home has to be someone inside, and since the economic conditions are not lacking, we have to think more about the stability of the family.